User talk:Soul Crusher

Archives

Block notice[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for this edit. In addition to the significant disruption that is currently being discussed at ANI, that diff seals the deal.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:07, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Soul Crusher (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My brother was attacking the computer, I apologize for uncouth behavior. Soul Crusher (talk) 23:30, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I'm the victim of an extensive and harmful prank, please send help.Soul Crusher (talk) 23:35, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

To the extent that you are asking to be unblocked because your edits were made by your brother and you believe you are not responsible for them for that reason, I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.

However, if you are genuinely experiencing account security or other issues that have compromised your account, let us know and we will find a way to create a new account for you where you will be able to discuss and address the reasons for this block and the disruption referenced at ANI. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 23:58, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of C17H19NO3 (musical project) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article C17H19NO3 (musical project) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C17H19NO3 (musical project) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm _Bacon 00:07, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Soul Crusher (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My neighbor broke into my house and made numerous eronious edits while I was out. This problem is currently being worked though.Soul Crusher (talk) 9:54 pm, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

We can't unblock you if your account is not under your control. only (talk) 01:55, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thank you, I'll make you aware of further developments.Soul Crusher (talk) 02:25, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Factor 42 for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Factor 42 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Factor 42 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 06:42, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chillum Dreams Vol. 2[edit]

The article Chillum Dreams Vol. 2 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable album, fails WP:GNG and WP:NALBUMS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:56, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Below San Onofre[edit]

The article Below San Onofre has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable album, fails WP:GNG and WP:NALBUMS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:57, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Hi, I'm Onel5969. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Moonraker (album), and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:58, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Moonraker (album)[edit]

The article Moonraker (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable album, fails WP:GNG and WP:NALBUMS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:58, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Hi, I'm Onel5969. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, SubNation Volume Two: An American Darkwave, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:59, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of SubNation Volume Two: An American Darkwave[edit]

The article SubNation Volume Two: An American Darkwave has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable album, fails WP:GNG and WP:NALBUMS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:59, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Hi, I'm Onel5969. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, SubNation Volume One: Industry vs. Artistry, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:59, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of SubNation Volume One: Industry vs. Artistry[edit]

The article SubNation Volume One: Industry vs. Artistry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable album, fails WP:GNG and WP:NALBUMS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:59, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Soul Crusher (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, my neighboor entered my house used my computor to make messages without my knowledge (the profane language on the other boards). I have reported this incident to the police and would like to request access back into my account.Soul Crusher (talk) 13:36, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not even close to believable. You should have stuck to the brother story. Now, it's kind of too late to come up with a believable story. So you're pretty much doomed. Floquenbeam (talk) 13:43, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

September 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for attempted gaslighting in unblock request. poorly executed, but still, attempted gaslighting. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Floquenbeam (talk) 13:49, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of "...The Truth Is a Fucking Lie..." for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article "...The Truth Is a Fucking Lie..." is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"...The Truth Is a Fucking Lie..." until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Chrisfilip (talk) 02:41, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gods of Chaos for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gods of Chaos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gods of Chaos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Chrisfilip (talk) 02:49, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Giovanni Pagliari" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Giovanni Pagliari and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 27#Giovanni Pagliari until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 22:59, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Drain band.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Drain band.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:57, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Machine Age (EP)[edit]

The article The Machine Age (EP) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NALBUM. Tagged for notability since 2020

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 17:43, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Underground, Inc. EPs[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Underground, Inc. EPs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 12:17, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Scribbler (album)[edit]

The article The Scribbler (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NMUSIC. Notability is not inherited.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nagol0929 (talk) 14:15, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Venture Bros.: The Music of JG Thirlwell for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Venture Bros.: The Music of JG Thirlwell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Venture Bros.: The Music of JG Thirlwell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 02:43, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]