User talk:Onel5969
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124 |
Edit Count[edit]
Wiki mark-up link[edit]
Hi! You might find these handy:
Cheers! — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 22:35, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Other useful links[edit]
- Special:New pages feed
- New pages sorted
- Stub Sort
- New Accounts
- Website Archive
- Cheatsheet
- Earwig's Copyvio tool
- Copypatrol copyvio tool
- Dabfix
- Dabsolver
- Dablink
- Dabs with missing entries
- Carbon dating the creation of web content (for checking for wiki mirrors)
- WorldCat
- Google Scholar profile
- WorldCat site
- Pending Changes
- G13 nominees
- Football Club History Database
Links for new editors[edit]
If you're leaving a question regarding an article you're attempting to get onto Wikipedia, here are some links you might find helpful:
- General notability criteria
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- How to structure and layout your article
- On how to properly format your citations
Lifeboat Numbers[edit]
Please will you stop amending Lifeboat Numbers. They are recorded as they are on the lifeboat. They do not have en dash (I think Wiki sees this as a date, but its a number.) Many thanks MartinOjsyork (talk) 11:28, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- Please could you provide an example. That way I can see exactly what I did incorrectly. Thanks. Onel5969 TT me 12:03, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hi
- Can't reproduce the box, but these are two lifeboat references.
- Boat with official number 1117, has operational number 47-014,
- but you didn't change that.
- Boat with official number 1288, has operational number 16-08
- which you changed to 16–08.
- This seems to happen regularly with this type of number, and I think its because Wiki is flagging it as a Date or date range???
- Hope that makes things a bit more clear. Apologies for all my other errors, I'm good at too many Capitals, and I don't have an endash key on my keyboard of course. To hard to keep doing alt 0150 etc, so I type hyphens, and then usually just forget to change them.
- Either way, these are hyphens and not endash
- | 1117
- | 47-014
- | James Bibby
- | 1986−2008
- | Tyne
- |
- |-
- | 1288
- | 16-08
- | Grace Dixon
- | 2008−
- | Tamar Ojsyork (talk) 23:47, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. I was simply looking for you to supply a link to the edit I made, that way I could see how I missed it. I understand your point about the lifeboat numbers, and yes, the AWB tool does mistakenly see that as a number range. Will attempt to catch these in the future. Onel5969 TT me 01:35, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Dear Editor:
Can you look at this article when you get a chance? Many thanks Joan arden murray (talk) 00:09, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Draft article[edit]
Hello,
I have noticed that you won 2018,2022 new page reviewer of the year. I have created an article about Yousef Abo Zarad and you have already checked it without deleting anything but now another editor have moved the article to draft. I would be glad if you could help me understand my mistake since you found it good to be on wikipedia.
Thank you ElisaBM (talk) 16:07, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Dear Editor:
Another article for you to kindly check. Thanks very much. Joan arden murray (talk) 17:55, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Lifeboat Numbers[edit]
What can I say. Please stop! MartinOjsyork (talk) 11:43, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Help needed[edit]
Hey man can you tell how can i add a category and link this page , it would be good if you tell me the steps InfoHistoric23 (talk) 13:11, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- You would need to let me know which page you were talking about. Onel5969 TT me 17:52, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Added Category Tags and Linked to other articles[edit]
I have added Category tags and link the article to other articles so it's no longer an uncategorised or Orphan article so i removed tags InfoHistoric23 (talk) 13:47, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Can you please review this article again?[edit]
I edited this page while you were cleaning it up, causing an edit conflict (which I did resolve but just to make sure it's fine now). Also, I moved the page to a different title due to misspelling. Excellenc1 (talk) 10:11, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry about the confusion. Yes, it looks fine. Onel5969 TT me 11:34, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for checking. Excellenc1 (talk) 12:10, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Your view would be appreciated here[edit]
Talk:Infantry Dreddmoto (talk) 15:20, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Dear Editor:
Could you take a look at this article when you get a chance? Many thanks! Joan arden murray (talk) 23:09, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Could you also look at this one? Joan arden murray (talk) 20:30, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Thank you!
Added a link[edit]
Namaste! Just checked that you have cleaned up Vinitha and added an orphan tag to it. First of all, I would like to thank you for cleaning up the article. I have added a link to it from a related article. So, I kindly request you to have a look into it and maybe remove the orphan tag? IDK how these things work as I am still learning. :) Thanks again. Looking forward for an update and maybe a digital space where I can catch up to learn more from you :) Theshubhz (talk) 12:07, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- Tag removed. But you don't have to ask permission to remove a tag like that. Once the issue has been corrected, you can simply remove the tag. Onel5969 TT me 14:29, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for your help. :) Could you please help me with one more thing? I am actually looking for a direct way to add photo to wikipedia. In previous pages, I added the photo through Flickr (CC0) but now it's not allowing new registrations.
- So, like what's the best way of adding a photograph to a wiki page without getting the file deleted? Theshubhz (talk) 06:22, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Well, there are two main ways to add images, either through Wikimedia Commons or through Wikipedia itself. If the file is in the public domain, that's easiest, and can be done through commons. A good guide is Wikipedia:Uploading images. Also, help in dtermining what is free and non-free is Wikipedia:Non-free content. Hope this helps. Onel5969 TT me 08:19, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:U.S.VoteFoundationLogo.jpg[edit]
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Next Israeli election (disambiguation)[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Next Israeli election (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
- disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
- disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
- is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:04, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Are We Dating The Same Guy?[edit]
Hi! I was discussing with a friend and this particular facebook group popped up in our conversation. While researching about the group, I found its wiki page to be particularly one-sided (as have been mentioned by even other users on the talk page). So, I set out to work crosschecking references to make sure that the information in place were legit and while as already stated, the language used was one-sided, I also found that in at least two instances, information from the references themselves were not used to create the complete picture/ context of some points. I tried to correct this but it was quickly reverted by another editor who I should add, may have something against the subject matter. As a woman in a hostile world, I am tired of seeing female spaces derided and if this particular space must have a page on Wiki, it should at least tell the whole story and give credit to where its due. Naslilx (talk) Naslilx (talk) 10:56, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, so when I saw your heading my first thought was, "Well I certainly hope not, since my wife would be very upset with me." Then I read the body of your message and realized you were talking about the wikipage on the subject. I took a look at the article, and the talk page, particularly your exchange with Panamitsu. I understand your viewpoint, but the best way to go about making the page more neutral is to check the sourcing and make sure the article's content accurately reflects the source. In your exchange with Panamitsu, they point out what they see as the inconsistency in your edit. I would suggest continuing the conversation on the page and reaching a consensus. And remember that if you stick to reliable sources, you can't go wrong. Onel5969 TT me 11:32, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Dear Editor:
One more for you to check! Thank you! Joan arden murray (talk) 17:36, 18 March 2024 (UTC)