User talk:Vajra Raja

Vajra Raja, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Vajra Raja! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 09:05, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 29[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hippo Regius, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berber (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:12, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sanskrit page[edit]

Hi, Just wanted to notify that there is a discussion going on in Sanskrit talk page, if you want to participate. Jaykul72 (talk) 10:37, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 29[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ariana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Huna.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Greeks in India redirect[edit]

It looks like you were trying to blank the redirect left at Greeks in India after moving it to Greeks Diaspora in India.

It's fine to create new redirects and to blank recently created redirect that were created in error, but re-targeting or deleting of redirects that have been around awhile should go through some kind of discussion, such as WP:Redirects for discussion. I didn't see any discussion about this redirect. Did I miss something? davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 🎄 02:37, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK I see you started a discussion at Talk:Greek conquests in India#Requested move 31 December 2020, please wait for it to close before changing things around. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 🎄 02:42, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Greek conquests in India, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 11:21, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, but you should not alter referenced quotes as you did here. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. पाटलिपुत्र Pat (talk) 12:24, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sudarshana Lake[edit]

Hello, Vajra Raja. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sudarshana Lake, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 03:11, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Vengeance 01 (talk) 11:52, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note - I'm leaving this alert on multiple other editors to make sure everyone is aware that editor behavior is closely watched on these articles. Vengeance 01 (talk) 11:52, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sudarshana Lake[edit]

Hello, Vajra Raja. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sudarshana Lake".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:52, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rajput forts[edit]

Hello, Vajra Raja. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rajput forts, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of Rigvedic tribes into List of ancient Indo-Aryan peoples and tribes. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🇨🇦 (talk) 14:50, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rajput forts[edit]

Hello, Vajra Raja. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rajput forts".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:26, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Psiĥedelisto. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sinhala language, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 11:06, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amrita, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Devas.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Fowler&fowler. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Maurya Empire have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. This is the version of a hard-won admin-supervised consensus. Please take to the article talk page if you must and attempt to obtain a fresh consensus. Be warned it can take weeks. Please do not edit war. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 20:13, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Maurya Empire. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Please note per WP:BRD (i.e. bold (your edit), revert (mine), and discuss) you need to establish a new consensus on the artcle's talk page. Merely making a post and engaging in WP:Editwarring is not helpful and can lead to penalties. You have received the ARBIPA notice in February 2021, so you are aware that these pages are closely watched by admins. The current placement of maps is the result of a previous consensus. Best regards, Fowler&fowler «Talk» 06:53, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Maurya Empire. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Please note that you are now dangerously close to violating the WP:3RR rule. Again, you need to seek a fresh consensus on the article's talk page, and not talk to me in edit summaries. Btw, "reenvision" is not a word in the English language, it is semantically meaningless. Best, Fowler&fowler «Talk» 10:57, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 5[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jat people, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Haplogroup L and Haplogroup Q.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Khatushyam Temple[edit]

Please make sure content you add is wp:verifiable. Wikipedia's credibility stems from it being well-sourced. Articles with insufficient sources can undermine Wikipedia's credibility. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 23:21, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 20[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kartikeya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mahasena.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you![edit]

Great edits to Varanasi, you changed images and some text at special:diff/1108925585/1109089172. Bluerasberry (talk) 00:08, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 25[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Patrick (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pater.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ayasya moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Ayasya, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:44, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Mahabharata, you may be blocked from editing. I doubt that you have the expertise to decide that an expert in the field published by a prestigious university press isn't reliable. Doug Weller talk 16:25, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing after many warnings none of which editor has replied to.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 16:27, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doug you've provided no definitive reasons for blocking me. Stop gatekeeping sites you have limited knowledge yet unfortunately have sway in. Vajra Raja (talk) 08:55, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Learn how to have a discourse. Instead of resorting to attempting to block people for editing, provide a counter. There are good faith edits, however your actions demonstrate you have a predisposed stance. Do better Doug. Vajra Raja (talk) 09:01, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vajra Raja (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

User Doug Weller blocked me without providing a reason or response. This is against Wikipedias good faith edit and discourse rules. Must be a power trip. Vajra Raja (talk) 08:57, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were given a clear reason for the block, and a clear path to resolving it("agree to discussion") but you have not done so, and made a personal attack("power trip"). 331dot (talk) 09:11, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Doug Weller had no substantial claim for blocking my good faith edit. He can't even explain how "Pradyumna: Lover, Magician, and Son of the Avatara" relates to the Mahābhārata. Just because it's been published by the oxford press doesn't mean it's credible in the field. Furthermore at least have proper punctuation in the reason why I'm being blocked. Vajra Raja (talk) 09:09, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So sorry I didn't spend time enough on punctuation for you. I've replaced it with the actual text in the block itself. I don't need to explain myself about the content issue. Doug Weller talk 09:39, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ayasya[edit]

Hello, Vajra Raja. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ayasya, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ayasya[edit]

Hello, Vajra Raja. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ayasya".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:03, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]