Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayank Kataria

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 21:01, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mayank Kataria[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I had proposed this article for deletion with the reasoning "I can't find evidence of notability in reliable, independent sources, and I can't find any evidence that e.g. the claim of "working with Tomorrowland" or with Jake Paul is based on reality. "

The Prod was removed with the rather outlandish statement "Removed deletion proposal, facts stated here are true and can be verified through the website and LinkedIn of the subject in question. Certain other facts stated here are under a confidentiality agreement, the details of which may not be released to the public but headlines are allowable."

So basically the article creator confirmed that the statements in the article are unverifiable, which makes this for our purposes an unacceptable article (if you remove all unverifiable stuff, you have the biography of a non-notable person). Fram (talk) 10:41, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:41, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:41, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:41, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete Another vanity article with no encyclopedic value. Just promotional, most likely self created. RationalPuff (talk) 13:57, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ - unverifiable vanity spam Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:10, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Changing opinion to speedy delete as per everyone else Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:14, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete There is nothing to Keep this article on Wikipedia. GermanKity (talk) 03:09, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I did specifically say that the 'details' (including payout etc.) are not allowed to be released, but the facts of its existence are public info. Please try to understand what I mean and if not i will be more than happy to elaborate further.

Not sure what this is. Crossing it out. Perhaps it was accidental. Lesliechin1 (talk)

Speedy Delete No news coverage has been provided. Lesliechin1 (talk) 09:13, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Fails WP:NBIO; borderline WP:A7. -- Ab207 (talk) 15:00, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete: Search shows zero coverage about the subject in reliable sources. The only reference cited in the article is his own website. Should be speedily deleted under WP:A7.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 18:12, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.