Talk:Neurocracy

DYK?

@Teratix, this article is currently at about 500 characters. If we can get it up to 1500 characters, it'll be eligible for DYK. I think something basic like ...that in the browser game Neurocracy, players explore a fictional successor to Wikipedia launched in 2049? could perform very well. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 22:44, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

I just expanded it enough to meet the minimum length threshold. It still requires additional work to get to DYK-level quality, but I'm going to make the nomination now so I don't forget it, as the eligibility window closes in a day. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 23:16, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 06:56, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that in the browser game Neurocracy, players explore a fictional successor to Wikipedia launched in 2049? Source: Kotaku "Neurocracy is a browser-based cyberpunk murder mystery story told over the course of 10 real-world weeks and 10 in-game days, through the hypothetical successor to Wikipedia, Omnipedia."
  • ALT1:... that the dystopian murder mystery browser game Neurocracy is presented through a fictional successor to Wikipedia? Source: Kotaku

• Comment: I came across this fascinating game today via the Signpost and wanted to nominate it before the DYK window closes. I've made the article just long enough to meet the length requirement, but it could still use expansion in various other areas.

Created by Teratix (talk) and Sdkb (talk). Nominated by Sdkb (talk) at 23:30, 26 September 2021 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: Expanded significantly (actually 5x, so doubly eligible) since the nomination so that should no longer be an issue. It's nice to have the self-reference in the hook. – Joe (talk) 13:56, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

To T:DYK/P2