Wikipedia:Peer review/Frank's Cock/archive1

Frank's Cock[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like to bring it to FA and would like feedback, mostly on prose, before going there (and while my current FA dawdles).

Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:35, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Brief comments

Looking forward to watching Talk:Main Page catch fire again.

Not my main goal, but I agree: it'll happen — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:23, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This would be a great TFA for Valentines day :) Mark Arsten (talk) 14:49, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, so much love and tenderness! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:54, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"the upper-left shows scenes representing mankind's creation" - suggest wikilinking the intended meaning of "mankind's creation" here. The description of the associated image says "one of mankind's creations", which has more potential interpretations - might want to amend that.

Done.

"older brother-younger brother" - roll of the MOS suggests this should be an endash, probably same for "NFB-John Spotton Award"

Done. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:23, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"one which portrayed an AIDS patient as one full of love" - which is full of love, the patient or the movie?

The patient. I think I've fixed this.

"a grant to create a three-minute film about breaking up" - this film wouldn't seem to meet those criteria; was it included in the omnibus, and were there any complaints from the grant granter?

Haven't found anything about how it ended up at 8 minutes. Breaking up here would seem to have emphasised the end of a relationship aspect. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:23, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Was it released outside Canada, or just screened at festivals? Nikkimaria (talk) 03:56, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Released as in theatrical? I don't think so. It was screened outside of Canada (Australia, the US, and Switzerland at least) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:23, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Casliber[edit]

More random notes - is looking good. Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:02, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Part of the terms of his grant were that Hoolboom was allowed a limited number of edit --> "edits"?

and one of the earliest not coming from the gay culture community - "culture" and "community" are both nouns, do we need both?
- Done both. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:06, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]