Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 February 22

< February 21	February 23 >

February 22[edit]

File:Kickboxing Logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:29, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free logo being used for identification in the Kickboxing article. This is not the logo for kickboxing as the general sport itself does not have a logo. Fails WP:NFCC#8 as well as being misleading. Whpq (talk) 00:52, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unnecessary, non-free and not needed for visual identification --Atomicdragon136 (talk) 20:33, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nealsc ch.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:29, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No good source for file, likely to be a professional photo. Smaller version appeared at https://web.archive.org/web/20100315020953/http://www.cooley.com/nealsc AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:30, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no source provided. The image is in use in a varieyt o websites for some time. Claim of being the copyright holder is not credible. -- Whpq (talk) 01:38, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as an almost-certain WP:COPYVIO. The file was uploaded by Executivebios (talk · contribs), whose user page declares him or her to be "an MBA student at Stanford business school," in April 2010, with a claim that that the user is the copyright holder of the work. But as AntiCompositeNumber points out, it was used as a professional photo on the law firm's web site; and a little further checking shows that it was on that site as early as August 2009, eight months before being uploaded here. I guess it's possible that the professional photographer that Cooley employed in 2009 was also an MBA student, but Occam says that that's pretty unlikely. TJRC (talk) 01:45, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Deportation of the Crimean Tatars.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

originally tagged for speedy deletion by PlanespotterA320 with the reason: "Photo does not show the 1944 deportation of the Crimean Tatars - this is actually a 1912 photo of Bulgarian reservists going to the warfront. The deportation of crimean tatars was violent and consisted mostly of civilians, not the military-aged men in this photo." FASTILY 05:17, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The source of the photo, the Foreign Ministry of the Ukraine, disagrees with PlanespotterA320. Although it implies that this photo illustrates the return of the Crimean Tatars FROM deportation, not the deportation itself. So, do we rely on the photo source or the stock photo company selling this photo? I'm not sure what happens in these cases where the subject of the photo is in dispute. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:29, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:57, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PHP5000 New Society coin.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. c:COM:CUR Philippines — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:31, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid license. Philippine coins are copyrighted Ronhjones ^(Talk) 05:00, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PHP50 Manuel Quezon coin.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:32, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid license. Philippine coins are copyrighted Ronhjones ^(Talk) 05:00, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PHP25 World Food Day coin.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:32, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid license. Philippine coins are copyrighted Ronhjones ^(Talk) 05:01, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PHP25 FAO Banaue Rice Terraces coin.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:32, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid license. Philippine coins are copyrighted Ronhjones ^(Talk) 05:01, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PHP25 BSP 25th anniv coin.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:32, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid license. Philippine coins are copyrighted Ronhjones ^(Talk) 05:01, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PHP1500 Security Printing and Minting coin.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:32, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid license. Philippine coins are copyrighted Ronhjones ^(Talk) 05:01, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PHP1500 San Lorenzo Ruiz gold coin.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:32, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid license. Philippine coins are copyrighted Ronhjones ^(Talk) 05:01, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PHP1500 Pope John Paul II gold coin.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:32, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid license. Philippine coins are copyrighted Ronhjones ^(Talk) 05:02, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PHP1500 New Society coin.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:33, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid license. Philippine coins are copyrighted Ronhjones ^(Talk) 05:02, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PHP1 Pope Paul VI silver coin.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:33, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid license. Philippine coins are copyrighted Ronhjones ^(Talk) 05:02, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PHP1 Philippine Culture Decade coin.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:33, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid license. Philippine coins are copyrighted Ronhjones ^(Talk) 05:02, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PHP 10 1986 EDSA coin.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:33, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid license. Philippine coins are copyrighted Ronhjones ^(Talk) 05:02, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PHP 1 Isidro Torres coin.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:33, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid license. Philippine coins are copyrighted Ronhjones ^(Talk) 05:02, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Philippine Piso New Generation Currency series.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:33, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid license. Philippine notes and coins are copyrighted Ronhjones ^(Talk) 05:04, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PHP5000 BSP 50th year gold coin.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:34, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid license. Philippine coins are copyrighted Ronhjones ^(Talk) 05:04, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PHP500 BSP 50th year silver coin.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:34, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid license. Philippine coins are copyrighted Ronhjones ^(Talk) 05:04, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PHP2 Manuel Roxas commemorative coin.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:34, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid license. Philippine coins are copyrighted Ronhjones ^(Talk) 05:04, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PHP10 Antonio Luna commemorative coin.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:34, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid license. Philippine coins are copyrighted Ronhjones ^(Talk) 05:04, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A Herby Moniker.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:13, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Per license at Flickr - https://www.flickr.com/photos/photopunk13/5422915401/in/pool-996632@N25/ as NC-ND ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:46, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Amiga Logo 1985.svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2019 March 2. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:35, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amiga Logo 1985.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Battle Of Sana'a.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:35, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious copyright violation. Map from Google Maps with copyright watermark claimed as the user's own image. Veggies (talk) 20:25, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pimple Saudagar Map1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:36, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious copyright violation. Map with clear Google watermark, deceptively edited to remove copyright stamp and claimed by the uploader as his own. Veggies (talk) 20:27, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Judea-maps-overlay.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:35, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User admits that this image is copied from Google Maps, which is copyrighted. Invalid license. Veggies (talk) 20:30, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 06:29, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete OrangeDog (τ • ε) 16:47, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jenckes Store 2013.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File obviously ripped from Google Maps Street View and claimed as uploader's own Veggies (talk) 20:40, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 06:29, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.