Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 May 23

< May 22	May 24 >

May 23[edit]

Tinchbbc.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: deleted

File:Tinchbbc.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jayy009 (notify | contribs).

No licensing, states it's from the BBC website who don't have GFDL licensing WebHamster 12:46, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, but this should be tagged {{subst:nld}}. Stifle (talk) 14:54, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done, but TBH this entry came about as I had a brain fart and chose the wrong function in Twinkle. Duh! --WebHamster 15:10, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unused, no license. — BQZip01 — ^talk 00:08, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Sans logique (video).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: deleted

File:Sans logique (video).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Europe22 (notify | contribs).

This non-free image is nothing more than a depiction of the artist, failing WP:NFCC#8 as not substantially increasing readers' understanding of the subject. Stifle (talk) 14:53, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Also, image is blurry/low quality and unencyclopedic. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 23:38, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom + FASTILY — BQZip01 — ^talk 00:10, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Enter The Chicken reissue.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete

File:Enter The Chicken reissue.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pachon (notify | contribs).

This image does not provide anything to readers' understanding of the article that the other cover image does not. Fails WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#3a. Stifle (talk) 14:54, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It is common practice to include album covers of reissues if they differ from the original release. --Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 15:04, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - That's arguable too, and in any case being common practice would not make it compliant with policy. Stifle (talk) 16:55, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    - Which policy forbids alternative covers? If it is forbidden, why is there an alternative album cover section in the album infobox? This cover does not fail WP:NFCC#8, otherwise all album covers would fail. It does not fail WP:NFCC#3a as it helps to illustrate the two different releases of this album, having different track lists and being released by different labels. --Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 17:08, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nothing wrong with showing an alternative cover. It still serves a purpose of identification of the product, as someone might not be familiar with the first cover. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 17:22, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non free images are only allowed when they provide usefull information that can not be easily conveyed by other means (criteria #1), in this case the second cover is identical to the fist except for some color changes. The words already in the article ("The cover of the reissue is identical to the original, save for some colour changes.") explain it all quite elequently, no second image needed.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sherool (talk • contribs)
Keep per my above comments. --Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 09:34, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - clearly fails NFCC#1 - can be replaced with a simple piece of text describing the small differences between the main image and this one. - Peripitus (Talk) 13:33, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, one image of the album is fine. We don't include multiple book covers for books that have been released many times under different covers. This image gives no useful info. – Quadell ^(talk) 18:54, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - What about those: The Downward Spiral, Horses (album), The Paul Simon Songbook, Youthanasia, The Beatles (album), Waterloo (album), Scarlet's Walk, These Days (Bon Jovi album), Magical Mystery Tour (album), White Pony, Enema of the State, Meddle, The Dark Side of the Moon, The Wall, The Division Bell and dozens more here. --Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 19:12, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1/2 a dozen of those are now up for deletion. There are hundreds of close-to-identical images that there is no convincing reason under NFCC for hosting....they've just not been nominated for deletion yet. - Peripitus (Talk) 07:21, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Without adding another image, you can simply state the changes (which are exclusively in color choices...which are simply inverted). Accordingly it violates WP:NFCC#3. — BQZip01 — ^talk 00:15, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Screenshot Dance of the Dead We Are One.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: deleted by Peripitus

File:Screenshot Dance of the Dead We Are One.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by HexaChord (notify | contribs).

Multiple images are used where one would suffice, failing WP:NFCC#3a. Stifle (talk) 14:55, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Only one image is used to illustrate the respective section in the article. --Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 15:01, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - There are two images in the article; one would suffice. Stifle (talk) 08:10, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    - Don't forget, you nominated four for deletion, and two of them already have been deleted... --Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 08:43, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom -FASTILY ^(TALK) 23:36, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Again, only one image is used. --Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 00:51, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Given the other images used in the article, this adds no new, useful information. – Quadell ^(talk) 18:57, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and all are up for deletion, disguised under various types of nomination (FFD, Prod, CSD). --Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 19:13, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not encyclopedic. Other images also used. — BQZip01 — ^talk 00:16, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

800px us flag 51 stars leftward.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: - Kept and licence fixed - Peripitus (Talk) 07:36, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:800px us flag 51 stars leftward.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Nrcprm2026 (notify | contribs).

This image was tagged as lacking license information. There was a suggestion on the talk page that it may be PD for want of originality; I think it is sufficiently plausible to bring the image here for further consideration. No opinion (yet) from me. Stifle (talk) 15:06, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and tag {{PD-ineligible}}. This is a modification to a PD design (the U.S. Flag), only altered in a simple geometric way. – Quadell ^(talk) 02:33, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Should supercede File:US flag 51 stars.svg (See US_Flag#Future_of_the_flag produced by the US Army Heraldry office). — BQZip01 — ^talk 00:20, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Ruthbatting.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:55, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ruthbatting.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Never been to spain (notify | contribs).

Fails WP:NFCC#1, but RFU declined. Babe Ruth is dead, but plenty of free license images are available at commons:Category:Babe Ruth. He's had pictures taken before 1923, and there are multiple collections at the Library of Collection with non-renewed or released copyrights. Mosmof (talk) 18:01, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support nom - File:Babe Ruth cropped.jpg will do. --Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 18:04, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, free images are available and already used in the article. In this instance, the non-free image is mostly decorative and does not add significantly to the reader's understanding. JGHowes ^talk 22:59, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. — BQZip01 — ^talk 00:21, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Alexandria S.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy Delete per G7 Icestorm815 • Talk 02:15, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alexandria S.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Suttna08 (notify | contribs).

Orphan Suttna08 (talk) 18:51, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This photo isn't needed anymore because the article was deleted. It was on one of my subpages. Suttna08 (talk) 18:52, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per CSD G7 - Author requests deletion. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 23:34, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Stephanie S.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy deleted, deletion requested by uploader (G7). --Sherool (talk) 02:51, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stephanie S.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Suttna08 (notify | contribs).

This image is not used in an article anymore. Suttna08 (talk) 20:06, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 23:32, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - G7 The uploader of this image (Suttna08) requests deletion. Cunard (talk) 23:49, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Tamim.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:56, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tamim.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by David Haberlah (notify | contribs).

Same image exists at File:MaleFemaleDate.jpg. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 21:32, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per CSD #F8. Image is a duplicate of another image available on Commons. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 23:33, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Pineposter.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: deleted

File:Pineposter.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Semisonic30 (notify | contribs).

Used only in a deleted article, and WP:OI in any case. Stifle (talk) 22:11, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Orphaned, no foreseeable use. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 23:35, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of the above. — BQZip01 — ^talk 00:21, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Farrahlogan.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: deleted Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:00, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Farrahlogan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Schmausschmaus (notify | contribs).

Non-free image used to illustrate a biographical article. Replaceable with a free alternate and so fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 22:59, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-free images of people who are still alive are generally not permitted. Stifle (talk) 11:32, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Stifle. A free version should be uploaded in place of this image. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 04:15, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete While her image may have drastically changed over time and she is noted for an appearance she had 40 years ago, another image is already in use and would be a better choice. — BQZip01 — ^talk 00:23, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Jacob Black.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:56, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jacob Black.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Weirdo82 (notify | contribs).

non-free image used in a "list of" article - having this image does not significantly add to reader's understanding (fails WP:NFCC#8) and I think that as the actor is not in any special costume it is also replaceable with a free alternate of the actor alone (fails WP:NFCC#1) Peripitus (Talk) 23:01, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted but also consider File:JacobBlack.jpg Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:27, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Bellaswan.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rodhullandemu (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bellaswan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Weirdo82 (notify | contribs).

non-free image used in a "list of" article - having this image does not significantly add to reader's understanding (fails WP:NFCC#8) and I think that as the actor is not in any special costume it is also replaceable with a free alternate of the actor alone (fails WP:NFCC#1) Peripitus (Talk) 23:02, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Rosalie&emmett.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: deleted Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:11, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rosalie&emmett.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Weirdo82 (notify | contribs).

non-free image used in a "list of" article - having this image does not significantly add to reader's understanding (fails WP:NFCC#8) and I think that as the actors are not in any special costume it is also replaceable with a free alternate of the actors alone (fails WP:NFCC#1) Peripitus (Talk) 23:02, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 00:24, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

721109Edward Cullen 3.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: deleted Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:11, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:721109Edward Cullen 3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pmlinediter (notify | contribs).

non-free image used in a "list of" article - having this image does not significantly add to reader's understanding (fails WP:NFCC#8) and I think that as the actor is not in any special costume it is also replaceable with a free alternate of the actor alone (fails WP:NFCC#1) Peripitus (Talk) 23:03, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Deleteper nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 00:24, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Carlisle.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: deleted Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:11, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carlisle.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Weirdo82 (notify | contribs).

non-free image used in a "list of" article - having this image does not significantly add to reader's understanding (fails WP:NFCC#8) - no discussion of the image in the article Peripitus (Talk) 23:03, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 00:27, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

GGEcircus.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: deleted Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:11, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:GGEcircus.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Davidbraun (notify | contribs).

Low quality. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 23:39, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete "Used with permission"≠"I am the copyright holder". OTRS verification would be necessary, but this photo isn't even used. — BQZip01 — ^talk 00:27, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.