Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abilympics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:41, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Abilympics[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The same user has spammed this article across multiple language wikis. It’s tagged everywhere for notability and potential UPE. The sourcing is primary. A WP:BEFORE does show some third party sources but it’s pretty thin and I don’t think it’s sufficient to demonstrate notability. Mccapra (talk) 17:28, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disability-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 17:28, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 17:28, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 17:28, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. This is merely spam based on primary sources. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:37, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Fails GNG. Grailcombs (talk) 19:41, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Doesn't meet notability criteria. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 09:51, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.