Template:Did you know nominations/Paleodictyon Nodosum
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:10, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Paleodictyon Nodosum[edit]
- ... that Paleodictyon nodosum (reconstruction of pattern pictured) made use of a new source of energy not dependent on the Sun?
Created/expanded by Matthewswehttam (talk). Nominated by Pikks (talk) at 22:38, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
This hook looks a bit weird and I cannot find it in the article. How about
- alt1 ... that Paleodictyon nodosum (reconstruction of pattern pictured) made use of a new source of energy not dependent on the Sun?
- Also article length and newness and referencing are OK. Hooks should be short enough, but I will leave another reviewer to see if they like the alternative hook. PS I have renamed to lowercase nodosum. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:08, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
- I believe the original hook is supported by this quote in the article: It was once assumed that the only source of energy that supported life was the sun. However the discovery of chemosynthetic bacteria in Giant Tube Worms introduced a new source of energy. --★ Pikks ★ MsG 09:14, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
- But it sounds to me as if the original hook is suggesting that there is life on the surface of the sun. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:31, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
- I believe the original hook is supported by this quote in the article: It was once assumed that the only source of energy that supported life was the sun. However the discovery of chemosynthetic bacteria in Giant Tube Worms introduced a new source of energy. --★ Pikks ★ MsG 09:14, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
