This article was nominated for deletion on 22 November 2018. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
MariskaNanni, a single-purpose editor, takes issue with the characterization of Roets as a "political activist" and instead wants to call him a "civil rights activist". She points to "credible sources". Problem is, the sourcing in this article is terrible. The current version has 13 sources--one is his dissertation (a primary source which can only verify the title of the dissertation), one is a blurb for a book on the website of a think-tank (an unreliable sources which mentions neither Roets nor AfriForum), one is the legal proceedings against Malema (another primary source), one is a shameless plug for the subject's book, one is a video by AfriForum. Oh, this isn't a reference either--it's a link to the subject's "film".
The other sources are likewise minimal, and don't even establish the subject's notability, let alone paint him as a "civil rights activist"--they establish him as the chairman of AfriForum ([1]) or the author of his book ([2]). In other words, notability itself is questionable. There are plenty of sources for AfriForum being a white nationalist joint, but that's by the by. This article needs serious pruning, and one wonders what is left when the book blurbs, book spam, propaganda videos, and primary material is gone--a redirect to AfriForum, I suspect. Doug Weller, any thoughts? Drmies (talk) 14:13, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Drmies: I've done some editing, and I've asked User:MariskaNanni if she has any paid relationship to AfriForum - it's pretty obvious that she does. Doug Wellertalk 16:45, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Doug Weller, did you see the AfD? It listed three sources: 1. this, a short piece about the book; 2. this, a serious piece that cites him a couple of times, even though one can hardly call this in-depth coverage; 3. this, a pretty serious piece that has more depth to it and actually helps toward notability. Drmies (talk) 17:11, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
BTW I wish that some of these editors here and on AfriForum were as interested in the African Farmers Association. Good people, both sides, yada yada. Drmies (talk) 17:12, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
One legitimate keep, one week keep, one sock keep. Still, probably notable, we just need a non POV article. One that isn't edited by AfriForum. Doug Wellertalk 17:16, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Whoa. User:E.M.Gregory was a sock? Well well well, there goes a half a dozen years of right-wing editing, out the window. Sheesh. Drmies (talk) 18:05, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that came as a surprise to me also. Doug Wellertalk 19:31, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
