Talk:De La Salle Santiago Zobel School

De La Salle Santiago Zobel School was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 17, 2006	Good article nominee	Listed
June 16, 2009	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Current status: Delisted good article

Tambayan Philippines Low‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Schools Mid‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tips[edit]

The section titles should conform to WP:MOS (especially capitalization), and the captions too. --Howard the Duck 14:25, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures are really really REALLY outdated. The Vaugirard isn't used for recollections and retreats anymore. The recollections are now held in the Our Lady of the Star building. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.203.104.40 (talk) 11:33, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA passes[edit]

This is a comprehensive, well-illustrated, well-sourced, well-organized article. Congratulations! It wasn't easy to do this in a way that didn't sound like an advertisement (It may well promote the school, but it will do so while staying within Wikipedia strictures).

Suggestions for future improvements.

A longer intro; there's certainly enough in the article to justify more up there.

Some copyediting to strain out the occasional typos.

Most importantly, consider moving some of the images to the alternating-left-and-right placement, at least where they've created some formatting problems with the edit links.

The 45K of length isn't a major problem for me, but the campus section strikes me as long enough that, following the example of some longer articles on U.S. colleges and universities, a daughter article could be spun off.

Good luck and congratulations once again. Daniel Case 12:51, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delist[edit]

Until the section titles are conformed into the manual of style I'll be delisting this by the weekend. --Howard the Duck 15:02, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anything else that needs to be addressed? --Mithril Cloud 16:02, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's fixed already (the threat of delisting can do wonders hehehe). --Howard the Duck 06:09, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, nice one. :p --Mithril Cloud 06:21, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:DLSZ Logo Clear Background.png[edit]

Image:DLSZ Logo Clear Background.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:57, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA comment[edit]

For the article to maintain its GA status, the logos need detailed fair use rationales. Look to other passed GA/FAs for examples. Let me know on my talk page if you have any questions. --Nehrams2020 06:35, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:LS star.png[edit]

Image:LS star.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 10:42, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:JuniorArcher.png[edit]

Image:JuniorArcher.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:17, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Dlsu centennial logo.PNG[edit]

The image File:Dlsu centennial logo.PNG is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:14, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment[edit]

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:De La Salle-Santiago Zobel School/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

I will be doing the GA Reassessment on this article as part of the GA Sweeps project. H1nkles (talk) 15:44, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:LEAD the lead is to be a summary of the entire article covering all the subjects found in the article. For an article of this size the lead should be two to three paragraphs. This lead is underdeveloped and should be expanded. There are several sections covered in the article that are not covered in the lead. H1nkles (talk) 16:38, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The referencing for the article is very sporadic with the following sections or sub-sections unreferenced: "Controller" sub section is also one sentence and should be combined or expanded. "Division 1 Library", "St. La Salle Building", "Saint Brother Mutien-Marie Building", "Brother Flavius Leo FSC Hall", "Athletic facilities", "Campus access" also is a single sentence and should be expanded or probably better to combine with another section. "School Seal" (I put an unreferenced template on this section since it has no references), and "Santiago Zobel". I count 9 sub-sections or full sections with no references. I did not include sections that have only one in-line citation in the above list. Several other sections have very sporadic referencing. For example the "Academic and Information Services" section has four entries, but only the "Institutional Development and Communications Office" has an in-line citation, the rest don't. The same holds true for the other two sections with lists of departments. Some of the entries have references but the others don't. There doesn't seem to be a reason behind where in-line citations are placed and why certain information is referenced and other information isn't.

I had trouble accessing the following links in the reference section: 11, 12, 13, 16, I seemed to have to log in or input a password to view these pages, this could be a problem with my browser though. 2, 6, 10, 21, and 22 are dead links. 15, 20, and 24 timed out and I couldn't get to them. That represents half of the references.

In my opinion this article will need to be overhauled. The links in the article need to be repaired and the rest of the article needs to be referenced. The lead will need to be rewritten as well. I do not believe this article can be fixed in short order so I will delist from GA. H1nkles (talk) 18:12, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If there will be an overhaul, it should be noted that the laboratories have been renovated, the Cybernook now has MacBooks and all the other computer laboratories have better computers. Also, in the campus map, the Parmenie is above, not below, the Chapel Of Our Lady Of The Star.--Dan2paul (talk) 02:21, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 05:53, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

De La Salle–Santiago Zobel School → De La Salle Santiago Zobel School – The school doesn't use a dash on its name. Refer to site and logo. Moray An Par (talk) 02:14, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on De La Salle Santiago Zobel School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:13, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]