Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 June 24

< June 23	June 25 >

June 24[edit]

File:OXEGEN 2009 POSTER.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free poster with a stated purpose of "Useful as a visual representation of the festival and the acts that performed on the weekend." AS a visual representation of the festival it fails WP:NFCC#8 as it is tucked at the bottom of the article with significant sourced commentary about the poster. AS for the acts that perfromed that weekend, that is covered by text already int he article so fails WP:NFCC#1. Whpq (talk) 18:31, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: the prose already give all the information in a far better and readable format than this non-free poster image at a low resolution. Clearly fails WP:NFCC#8 as there is no critical commentary about the poster itself. ww2censor (talk) 10:43, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Does not meet our criteria for inclusion/exceptions. Buffs (talk) 16:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A Very Trainor Christmas (Target).png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A second non-free cover which is for a limited edition/limited/single-retailer version of the album. Although the outfit and pose are different, it could easily be explained in words and therefore its exclusion is not detrimental to a reader's understanding of the topic. Purpose of Use inaccurate as it says "main infobox, identification and critical commentary." The main version of the album does not use this cover, it is relegated to the "alternative cover" template within the misc section of the infobox and is therefore not the primary identifier for this topic. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 22:26, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SWC CT Map.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Probably doesn't qualify for fair use because we can make our own map, and that the logos are not absolutely necessary. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:54, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.