Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 August 30

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 30[edit]

File:WhatIAmSample.ogg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 13:08, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:WhatIAmSample.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hotwiki (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The main matter is, per WP:NFCC#8, whether deleting this sample would affect the understanding of the song "What I Am" rather than whether the sample itself improves. This is of a 1999 cover recording. If anything, either a sample of the original 1988 version would do, or no sample is needed for the song article, especially if choosing a segment is hard. George Ho (talk) 03:33, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Patrick Burns 2009.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 13:08, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Patrick Burns 2009.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ghostgeek (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Doubtful own work. File:Patrick Lynn Burns, May 2022.jpg uploaded as "own work" but exif states otherwise. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:52, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 08:02, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Emacs gentoo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 15:10, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emacs gentoo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Teh l33+ (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused screenshot with simple code. No obvious use. Better options available. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:15, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 08:02, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Emacs gentoo2.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 15:10, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emacs gentoo2.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Teh l33+ (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused screenshot with simple code. No obvious use. Better options available. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:15, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 08:03, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Emiliano Reyes addressing foreign dignitaries in Vienna.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 15:10, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emiliano Reyes addressing foreign dignitaries in Vienna.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Tomorrowcarlson (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Doubtful own work per uploader's talk page. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:22, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 08:03, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Enrique Jr and Enrique Sr in Japan.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 15:10, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Enrique Jr and Enrique Sr in Japan.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lord777 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Low quality, no exif, uploads of varying sizes. Doubtful own work. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:51, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 08:03, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Enrique with Kameni.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 15:10, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Enrique with Kameni.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lord777 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Low quality, no exif, uploads of varying sizes. Doubtful own work. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:51, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 08:03, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Enrique with Samuel.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 15:10, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Enrique with Samuel.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lord777 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Low quality, no exif, uploads of varying sizes. Doubtful own work. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:51, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 08:03, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Meza Jr Excited with his U17 player who scored.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 15:10, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Meza Jr Excited with his U17 player who scored.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lord777 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Low quality, no permission, uploads of varying sizes. Doubtful own work. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:52, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 08:03, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Josh.Moore in 2005.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:00, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Josh.Moore in 2005.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ehblogspot (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Appears to be from https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB119740307505821565 (albeit weirdly stretched). Adeletron 3030 (talkedits) 15:53, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Josh.MoorePromo photo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:00, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Josh.MoorePromo photo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ehblogspot (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Appears to be a scan, based on the lines on the image and tightly cropped. Insufficient source info, especially given the user's upload history. Adeletron 3030 (talkedits) 15:55, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 08:04, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Paul Anka - Diana.ogg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paul Anka - Diana.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Leveni (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The sample was de-PRODded per assumption that my rationale and citing WP:NFCC#8 weren't enough. It's not about samples in general. Rather it's about this sample specifically. When I heard the sample, I can identify only one portion/segment of Diana (Paul Anka song). However, I have to hear the whole recording to deeply understand the article's description about the song. The sample is either insufficient or unnecessary to understand the whole song, and I doubt that deleting the song would affect such understanding. If the article itself is sufficient critical commentary, even as a stub, then.... great. However, after a few replays of the sample, I heard it as no different from other samples of the original Paul Anka recording in other websites, like Amazon, regardless of which segments were used as samples. George Ho (talk) 22:32, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Lacks sufficient sourced critical commentary to satisfy WP:NFCC#8. plicit 23:43, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.