Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 November 26

< November 25	November 27 >

November 26[edit]

File:PROTA logo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: convert to fair use. ℯ xplicit 00:13, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find any evidence of GPL licensing in this archived copy of the source page. The copyright statement under "Disclaimer" is vague, but does not clearly state any free license nor make a sufficient claim for {{attribution}}. FFDing based on the fact the file is over a decade old. AntiCompositeNumber (Ring me) 00:09, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed that the uploader has text copyright warnings from 10 years ago from the same source. This is probably speedy worthy now. --AntiCompositeNumber (Ring me) 00:11, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to non-free logo and add a fair use. Salavat (talk) 00:19, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:QBESampleTable2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused small image of text, replaced a while ago by wikitable at Query by Example. DMacks (talk) 09:00, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 00:19, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:My Love upcoming movie poster.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G3 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:16, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be a hoax. Rather improbable that Messi will turn actor while still an active football player, and no evidence that the movie exists. An article, My Love (2019 film) was deleted as a hoax. Sjö (talk) 16:03, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Martin Brown.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No value to the project. The purported author seems to be an unknown teen. Sjö (talk) 16:07, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unused here, out of scope on Commons, and there's no evidence of permission in that tweet. --AntiCompositeNumber (Ring me) 21:49, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:18, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Palace Station.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFCC issues / WP:OTRS request. 2602:302:D1A2:C740:5407:7819:5B3C:9E34 (talk) 16:26, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NAF DD 01.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find the original source for this document. I did find a slightly later version here. I don't see anything stating the content has been released into the public domain. As such, this will need to go through OTRS as described here. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:34, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NAF Special Tasks Force 05.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find the original source for this document. I did find a slightly later version here. I don't see anything stating the content has been released into the public domain. As such, this will need to go through OTRS as described here. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:34, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NAF National Guard 02.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find the original source for this document. I did find a slightly later version here. I don't see anything stating the content has been released into the public domain. As such, this will need to go through OTRS as described here. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:35, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:18, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NAF Zemessardze 01.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find the original source for this document. I did find a slightly later version here. I don't see anything stating the content has been released into the public domain. As such, this will need to go through OTRS as described here. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:35, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NAF International 01.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find the original source for this document. I did find a slightly later version here. I don't see anything stating the content has been released into the public domain. As such, this will need to go through OTRS as described here. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:35, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:17, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NAF Special Tasks Unit 03.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find the original source for this document. I did find a slightly later version here. I don't see anything stating the content has been released into the public domain. As such, this will need to go through OTRS as described here. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:35, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:16, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NAF Special Tasks Unit 02.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find the original source for this document. I did find a slightly later version here. I don't see anything stating the content has been released into the public domain. As such, this will need to go through OTRS as described here. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:35, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:15, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NAF Special Tasks Unit 01.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find the original source for this document. I did find a slightly later version here. I don't see anything stating the content has been released into the public domain. As such, this will need to go through OTRS as described here. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:36, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:14, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NAF Military Police 01.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find the original source for this document. I did find a slightly later version here. I don't see anything stating the content has been released into the public domain. As such, this will need to go through OTRS as described here. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:36, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NAF Naval Forces 02.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find the original source for this document. I did find a slightly later version here. I don't see anything stating the content has been released into the public domain. As such, this will need to go through OTRS as described here. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:36, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NAF Naval Forces 01.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find the original source for this document. I did find a slightly later version here. I don't see anything stating the content has been released into the public domain. As such, this will need to go through OTRS as described here. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:36, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:14, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NAF Air Force 03.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find the original source for this document. I did find a slightly later version here. I don't see anything stating the content has been released into the public domain. As such, this will need to go through OTRS as described here. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:36, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NAF Air Force 02.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find the original source for this document. I did find a slightly later version here. I don't see anything stating the content has been released into the public domain. As such, this will need to go through OTRS as described here. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:36, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:14, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NAF 2nd Infantry Battalion 01.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find the original source for this document. I did find a slightly later version here. I don't see anything stating the content has been released into the public domain. As such, this will need to go through OTRS as described here. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:36, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:13, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NAF 1st Infantry Battalion 02.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find the original source for this document. I did find a slightly later version here. I don't see anything stating the content has been released into the public domain. As such, this will need to go through OTRS as described here. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:36, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:13, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NAF 1st Infantry Battalion 01.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find the original source for this document. I did find a slightly later version here. I don't see anything stating the content has been released into the public domain. As such, this will need to go through OTRS as described here. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:36, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hafiz-mohd-saeed.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No link to source (can't assume it's from a free video on YouTube). Fair use of non-free image of a living person. sami ^talk 21:35, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Knowledge & Innocence.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The previous non-free use rationale was wholly inadequate, but even with my updated one, I still don't think this meets WP:NFCI#1, per its footnote. The album article was merged to the artist article per consensus at AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knowledge & Innocence. Adam9007 (talk) 23:14, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support although there is a discussion of the album itself in the article, that is likely not enough to maintain FUR. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:58, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and the more detailed comments made by myself and others given at User talk:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz#FUR. Bascially, this is an non-free album cover which was being used in a stand-alone article about the album in question, which in turn was subsequently moved to the artist's article per an AfD discussion. The |article= parameter in the non-free use rationale was simply changed to the artist's article even though the file is now being used in a completely different manner. Whatever justification there was for this in the album's article per WP:NFC#cite_note-3, does not apply at all to the artist's article and the file should be deleted unless someone is able to improve the article content so that WP:NFCC#8 is clearly justified. In a general note, it might be a good idea to work up some guidance for how to deal with album cover art and other non-free content files which are moved as part of a merge. Perhaps, something similar to WP:FILMSCORE could be created and added to WP:MERGE? I wonder if some editors assume that the |cover= parameter in {{Infobox album}} means that non-free use is OK as long as the cover art is being used in an infobox, regardless of where that infobox is located in the article. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:41, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. An album cover is used for identification purposes unless substantially discussed in the article, but identification purposes is only a rationale when the image is of the article subject. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 14:59, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.