Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 April 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 2[edit]

Condition of government hospital,Dahod,Gujarat.jpg[edit]

File:Condition of government hospital,Dahod,Gujarat.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, but a local image description page exists. If you are wanting the image deleted, please nominate it for deletion on Commons. If you are requesting deletion of the local image description page only, use {{db-nofile}} if possible; if that is not possible, list it at WP:MFD. AnomieBOT 11:07, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Condition of government hospital,Dahod,Gujarat.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rahultalreja11 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

First of all no one can claim that the image was taken from a government hospital in Dahod, Gujarat, India. It could have been taken anywhere, literally anywhere. Secondly by naming it as Condition of government hospital,Dahod,Gujarat it falsely depicts the government hospitals in Dahod, which will surely be a misleading information. ShriramTalk 11:01, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may remove the image from the page you want but you hold no right to delete this image. I legally have all the copyrights of the image and the image was uploaded accepting all the Terms & Conditions of Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rahultalreja11 (talkcontribs)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


File:Jack Gets in the Game.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 09:04, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jack Gets in the Game.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Reece Leonard (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Random non-free image used apparently to populate an infobox. This image of two actors adds nothing of any significance to reader's understanding and fails WP:NFCC#8. Peripitus (Talk) 11:22, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

These two actors' conversation is vital to the plot of the episode; the entire structure is based around this conversation, therefore it is important and warrants inclusion. Reece Leonard (talk) 14:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why do reader's need an image of two actors speaking to comprehend that they spoke ? - Peripitus (Talk) 11:39, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Somebody to Love.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 09:04, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Somebody to Love.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Reece Leonard (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

non-free image of just text. This could very clearly be replaced by text alone saying what is on the sign - fails WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 11:28, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see your point on this one. I will move the sign to a photo box in the description of the episode, but deletion is neither necessary, nor warranted. The image is of a specific reference to post-9/11 paranoia in the United States and is vital to understanding the plot of the episode. Reece Leonard (talk) 14:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:OneNote for Mac.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 09:04, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:OneNote for Mac.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by True Tech Talk Time (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This image violates NFCC§3 as it is too similar to File:Microsoft OneNote 2013 Default Screen.png used in the same article and the article does not discuss something unique in this screenshot. Codename Lisa (talk) 23:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Image portrays a different view compared to the second image, all it needs is a better and more informative caption.Loved Nexus (talk) 04:42, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.