Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 September 12

< September 11	September 13 >

September 12[edit]

File:Hanson1963.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Obsoleted by Commons version which is vertically inverted: commons:File:Hanson1963.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 06:24, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2012 Legislative Yuan Seat Composition.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. No foreseeable use thanks to the Commons image it shadows. Stefan2 (talk) 12:50, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment also redundant with File:8th Legislative Yuan Seat Composition.svg -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 21:41, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Agnes de Mille.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:41, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be replaceable: Commons:Category:Agnes de Mille Stefan2 (talk) 13:13, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - All of the Commons images show de Mille in character, and it's long been the case that infobox images are supposed to show the actor as themselves, and not in character, whenever possible. Furthermore, the image in question is a publicity picture, distributed widely to be used as needed by media outlets. Beyond My Ken (talk) 17:05, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed the license to indicate that it's a promotional photo. Beyond My Ken (talk) 17:15, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Anna Maria Mozart.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:File:Anna Maria Mozart.jpg is better. Stefan2 (talk) 14:03, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tiomkin 1962.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No explanation for tagging this non-free image. Above copyright and source info. given. --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 17:38, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Violates WP:NFC#UUI §7. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:02, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Koln Bonn Airport logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced by File:Koln Bonn Airport.png on Commons. Cloudbound (talk) 19:40, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Samia Nkrumah & Sonia Gandhi.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader of this file has forged email addresses to spoof the OTRS process. Without further confirmation by a trusted user, we cannot assume that the OTRS ticket is valid or that the license is correct. Sven Manguard Wha? 23:55, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to delete the image because of a suspicion and "not a fact" that I have forged email addresses to spoof the OTRS process for "File:Samia Nkrumah & Sonia Gandhi.jpg" then go ahead. Sven Manguard says "Without further confirmation by a trusted user, we cannot assume that the OTRS ticket is valid or that the license is correct.", Sven Manguard is the "we", Sven Manguard is the "we" that strongly "cannot assume that the OTRS ticket is valid or that the license is correct". – MarkMysoe (talk) 02:40, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete See Commons:Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 30#User:MarkMysoe for examples of forged OTRS mails. Also, according to this diff, the uploader didn't have access to the Internet when the above comment was posted from his account. Unless the user has had his account hacked, he was obviously lying on that talk page. --Stefan2 (talk) 07:17, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.