Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 November 9

< November 8	November 10 >

November 9[edit]

File:Thumbnail.aspx.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete JamesBWatson (talk) 11:07, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged with {{split media}}, but none of the three versions look encyclopedic. Additionally, they lack useful description, and judging from the filename, they may be copied from a non-free source. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:19, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment whatever happens with the individual files, this filename should be salted since it obviously is overly generic and prone to being overwritten by random files. -- 70.24.186.245 (talk) 06:46, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wilmmott kathy.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete JamesBWatson (talk) 11:13, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Readers may already understand the scene by reading EastEnders and other related articles. Image is unnecessary, and nomination is overdue. Even the still image itself is inadequate without text. As disturbing as is, omitting this image does not deplete the article. George Ho (talk) 22:39, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support: as you say, it doesn't add any value to the article. Fair use is to allow use of media that would help aid the reader and provide a greater understanding of the topic. This image doesn't do that. -- Peter ^{Talk to me} 20:28, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above message was posted not by User:Peter, but by User:Hazhk

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Eeowendenise.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Readers may already understand the scene by reading EastEnders and other related articles. Image is unnecessary, and nomination is overdue. Even the still image itself is inadequate without text. As disturbing as is, omitting this image does not deplete the article. George Ho (talk) 22:40, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.