Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 November 20

< November 19	November 21 >

November 20[edit]

File:Rollback example.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image replaced by formatted text Alex³ (talk) 00:35, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Iconiq LightAheadDVD.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#3 as multiple files are being used when one would suffice. This alternate cover is not significantly different from the main cover to justify its use. — ξ ^xplicit 02:23, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - in the context of File:Iconiq LightAhead.jpg already being used, this doesn't add much. PhilKnight (talk) 23:56, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Womans vulva with urethra.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:09, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned picture. (Please take it away, or find a way to utilize it properly.) :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 04:31, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Move to commons annotated version of a commons image, since commons also hosts different versions of images with annotations, this should also be there. 76.66.194.212 (talk) 06:36, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Star Parker.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The following image was taken from a C-Span broadcast but is not a work of the federal government and therefore a copyright violation: File:Star Parker.jpg in the C-Span studio, image taken from http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/Administrai Hekerui (talk) 09:53, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This scene shown in this image did not take place during "legislative proceedings of the U.S. House and U.S. Senate" so it is a non-free image. If it would have taken place during those proceedings, then it would be public domain. Because it is a non-free image of living person and being used as an infobox image, it should be deleted.--Rockfang (talk) 01:10, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Angela McGlowan.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The following image was taken from a C-Span broadcast but is not a work of the federal government and therefore a copyright violation: File:Angela McGlowan.jpg at a rally in Searchlight, Nevada, image taken from http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/PartyEx (around 2 hours, 13 minutes) Hekerui (talk) 09:53, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This scene shown in this image did not take place during "legislative proceedings of the U.S. House and U.S. Senate" so it is a non-free image. If it would have taken place during those proceedings, then it would be public domain. Because it is a non-free image of living person and being used as an infobox image, it should be deleted.--Rockfang (talk) 01:12, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kelly Ayotte.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The following image was taken from a C-Span broadcast but is not a work of the federal government and therefore a copyright violation: File:Kelly Ayotte.jpg at a debate on ABC-affiliate WMUR-TV, image taken from http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/NewHampshireSenateD Hekerui (talk) 09:53, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Unencyclopedic. Likely posted because it is unflattering (see COIN). Also, even CSPAN gives its televises the legislative proceedings of the U.S. House and U.S. Senate to the public domain,[1], this derivative work of said video is copyrightable. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 11:32, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This scene shown in this image did not take place during "legislative proceedings of the U.S. House and U.S. Senate" so it is a non-free image. If it would have taken place during those proceedings, then it would be public domain. Because it is a non-free image of living person and being used as an infobox image, it should be deleted.--Rockfang (talk) 01:11, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Karen Handel.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The following image was taken from a C-Span broadcast but is not a work of the federal government and therefore a copyright violation: File:Karen Handel.jpg at a News Media Stakeout in front of the U.S. Supreme Court, image taken from http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/CaseRe (around 26 minutes) Hekerui (talk) 09:53, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This scene shown in this image did not take place during "legislative proceedings of the U.S. House and U.S. Senate" so it is a non-free image. If it would have taken place during those proceedings, then it would be public domain. Because it is a non-free image of living person and being used as an infobox image, it should be deleted.--Rockfang (talk) 01:12, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dino Rossi.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The following image was taken from a C-Span broadcast but is not a work of the federal government and therefore a copyright violation: File:Dino Rossi.jpg at a TV debate on KOMO-TV, image taken from http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/WashingtonSenateDebate2 Hekerui (talk) 09:53, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no evidence given that "work of federal government" is accurate. It shouldn't be hard to get a better free-use photo. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 00:18, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This scene shown in this image did not take place during "legislative proceedings of the U.S. House and U.S. Senate" so it is a non-free image. If it would have taken place during those proceedings, then it would be public domain. Because it is a non-free image of living person and being used as an infobox image, it should be deleted.--Rockfang (talk) 01:13, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Flowersongrave.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:07, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file memphisto 12:49, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FingaskRoyalCoatofArms.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:07, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file memphisto 12:49, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JessieThreiplandDetail.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:07, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file memphisto 12:49, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ElizaThreiplandDetail.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:07, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file memphisto 12:49, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Damadola airstrike protest.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. The WP:NFCC requires non-free media to meet all points of the criteria. Delete arguments asserted that free text can adequately describe what's in the image. The keep arguments hardly mentioned the policy or this specific image, but more of the responses itself to the Damadola airstrike. The delete arguments are more policy-based, which hold more weight, hence the deletion. — ξ ^xplicit 00:16, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image is not uniquely historical as there has been no critical commentary of the image; unacceptable non-free criteria 5 and 7; fails Wikipedia:NFCC#8. Swarm ^X 08:43, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep (speed close) - part of the mass nomination of almost the entire collection of images on Wikipedia that show civilian victims and destruction from the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Highly important images that are not replaceable. All these images have a valid fair use rational and they are perfectly fine to use under fair use. Our Nominator does not show any knowledge on copyright laws or the DMCA and he should not forget the greater goal we have. There is no problem with copyright and the mass deletion of these images though "Wikipedia:Wikilawyering" would be highly troublesome. None of the given reasons is strong enough to justify the deletion of images from that importance. IQinn (talk) 15:24, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This image shows an example of something under significant coverage under Damadola airstrike#Responses. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 02:38, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, maybe - depends on if New York Times is a "press agency", per WP:NFC#UUI7. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:22, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SchuminWeb (Talk) 22:22, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this is an image of a protest which can be adequately described with text alone, and omission of the image would not be detrimental to readers' understanding of the topic, so the image fails WP:NFCC#8. Hekerui (talk) 22:40, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the image is being used primarily for decoration, and thus fails non-free content criterion #8. The visual depiction of protesters does not "significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic" and omission of the image does not undermine that understanding. The image also is non-specific, in that no element of the photo specifically or clearly ties it to the Damadola airstrike, which further degrades the case for non-free use. -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 03:51, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.