Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strange Attractors Audio House

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  11:35, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Strange Attractors Audio House[edit]

Strange Attractors Audio House (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Source searches are only providing passing mentions; does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. North America1000 09:18, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:18, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:18, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:18, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • comment - that's a lot of notable artists for a non-notable label. There's not much out there on the label, certainly. The best I found was [1], and that's a sales site. The "official" site was unrelated to the topic, so I removed it. This may be as close to an official site as exists, or maybe their Facebook page. One of their most promoted artists is Glenn Jones, but the current Wikipedia link is to a different artist. This deserves more investigation, but I'm not convinced enough to vote keep yet. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 13:34, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:20, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Artists linked therein aren't entirely notable names either just because they have articles, most of which are poorly sourced. sixtynine • whaddya want? • 06:01, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.