User talk:Strater

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Strater, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! SwisterTwister talk 19:16, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Heart of Europe Bio-Crystallography Meeting[edit]

The article Heart of Europe Bio-Crystallography Meeting has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you. This proposed deletion was started by User:Piotrus

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:42, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have generated the article some time ago based on the information in the German wikipedia, the information in the cited websites of the individual conference sites and the booklet written by Mariusz Jaskolski (also cited in the article). If I understand correctly, the problem is that all information that is cited, has been published by people from the "organisation", here the people organising or attending this annual scientific conference. This is the case. I know that reports about the conference series have been published in independent sources such as the newsletter of the International Union of Crystallography or the annual publication of the German Crystallographic association. In most of these cases, however, it were also scientists who participated in the conference series, who wrote these articles. It is not clear to me if the following therefore applies or not:

"Organizations are usually notable if they meet both of the following standards: The scope of their activities is national or international in scale. The organization has received significant coverage in multiple[2] reliable sources that are independent of the organization."

I will check if there have been additional reports or publications by people who were not participants of the conference. However, this will take some time. How much time do we have to add this information?

Strater (talk) 11:17, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quik change mutagenesis (November 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NotAGenious was:

This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Article wizard/Redirects. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Quik change mutagenesis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NotAGenious (talk) 12:18, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Quikchange mutagenesis[edit]

Hello, Strater. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Quikchange mutagenesis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Quik change mutagenesis[edit]

Hello, Strater. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Quik change mutagenesis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]