User talk:Iniced

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iniced (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here I was a good editer and would like to be able edit again can someone unban me thanks Iniced (talk) 18:56, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Huon (talk) 18:57, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iniced (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here I was a good editer and would like to be able edit again can someone unban me thanks I trying again as I been a editr for 5 years surey I can have a chance to show that. aslo if unban I would be a usefull editer I can,t tell you more than that. Iniced (talk) 18:56, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were not a good editor. You violated WP:SOCK, and this is what lead to your block. As your somewhat incoherent unblock request doesn't even address this, I'm declining your unblock request. Yamla (talk) 21:18, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The next time you remove a declined unblock message in violation of policy (see WP:REMOVE), I will revoke talk page access. I was prepared to let it slide when you claimed to be retired, but you clearly aren't, and the impression you give is that you attempt to evade scrutiny. Huon (talk) 20:31, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Huon: I revoked Talk page access before you posted the above warning.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:13, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I doubt it's a big loss. WP:UTRS is still available, but I'd advise Iniced to wait at least six months without sockpuppetry per WP:OFFER. Huon (talk) 21:23, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]