User talk:Awhellnawr123214

Hi! I'm Awhellnawr123214! I'm a dedicated Wikipedian helping to fix errors and add clarity to Australian and international Wikipedia pages on the English Wikipedia.

October 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Bagumba. Your recent edit to the page James Harden appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 14:23, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your response to an edit request on Talk:David Beckham[edit]

Hello! Thank you for your interest in responding to edit requests, it isn't the most glamorous or fulfilling maintenance queue on Wikipedia and it can always use more eyes. However, I have some concerns with how you answered one in particular.

I would firstly advise against instructing IP editors to create Wikipedia accounts. It isn't required, and it may discourage such persons from contributing constructively in the future. In terms of contacting you on your talk page, generally, any questions about your decision should stay on the article's talk page. That way watchers of the page can read the discussion and participate if they wish.

Finally, requestors do not traditionally need to explicitly state how a requested edit "improves the page" as that tends to be implied based on the edit requested. If it's to remove material, it's usually because they are arguing it's unsuitable in some fashion. If it's to add material, then expanding an article is generally seen as a positive inherently, unless the addition conflicts with some content policy.

Moving forward, also make sure to set the answered=no parameter in the edit request template to answered=yes when you review them. That way they get removed from the queue located at User:AnomieBOT/SPERTable. A fantastic tool for this is the Edit Request Tool script by Terasail. Please see Wikipedia:Edit requests for more information on how they should be made and reviewed. Cheers! —Sirdog (talk) 01:19, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Sirdog, thanks for your suggestions. I couldn't work out how to reset the answered=no parameter, but now I have added the Edit Request Tool to my common.js page. Once again, thanks! Awhellnawr123214 (talk) 03:57, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@sirdog Sorry, forgot to mention you in my response. Awhellnawr123214 (talk) 06:51, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, Awhellnawr123214, I was subscribed to this topic anywho. I'm glad I was able to help you!

—Sirdog (talk) 13:32, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I noticed that you recently removed content from Hazaribagh without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - Arjayay (talk) 11:02, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hazaribagh, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:02, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: History of the Milwaukee Bucks (April 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:History of the Milwaukee Bucks and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Toadette^Edit! 15:47, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Awhellnawr123214! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Toadette^Edit! 15:47, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]