Talk:Political party strength in Indiana

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

General Assembly[edit]

I bet you are going to have a hard time finding the balance of power in the General Assembly. If I come across anything giving numbers I make a note for you with the source. I found this one earlier - 1837 election: House- 53 Whigs, 43 Democrats, Senate - 12 Whigs, 7 Democrats. [1]. Elections where still be held annually for the house of representatives then. So these results are only good for one year. Charles Edward (Talk) 14:05, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, CE! Yeah I knew the General Assembly would be extremely difficult, I no idea where I could possibly find those numbers. HoosierStateTalk 16:41, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • In 1988 the house of representatives was split 50-50, republican and democrat.[2] It is towards the bottom of the page. Charles Edward
  • In 1857 the Democrats had the house, and the republican held the senate. No exact numbers. [3] The General Assembly was only meeting every other year then, so the results can count for two years. Charles Edward
  • The whigs held the house in 1842 [4]
  • There was 28 member of the house of representatives in 1816. There was no party affiliation at that point. Everyone was Democratic Republican or not affiliated. [5]. Just reading through, it looks like it was the 1820s before any real parties were organized in the state.

Charles Edward (Talk) 02:28, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome! Every little bit helps! HoosierStateTalk 02:29, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As far as party control, but not composition, of the House goes, Speaker of the Indiana House of Representatives might provide some insight, but the list is incomplete. Qqqqqq (talk) 02:40, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here is something good too. [6] These books give exact break downs of the entire legislature. They are very detailed. Search only brings up a few though. The speakers list would be pretty good, ecept for the 1850s and 1860s. There was several coalition majorities among the Whigs, Know Nothings Republicans, and Democrats. At a couple points all four parties had representation. I know I have read about that, I am trying to find it. Charles Edward (Talk) 02:47, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Whigs held the house in 1844 [7]
  • In 1845 the democrats controlled both houses [8] The Senate was split 25 whigs, 25 democrats, but the Lt Gov was democrat giving the Dems control. [9]
  • In 1846 the democrats held the house, the whigs controlled the senate. [10]
  • Democrats held both houses in 1849 [11]
  • Democrats also held both houses in 1850 and 1851 by a 2-1 majority. [12], and 1852 [13] which destroyed the free soil and whig parties in the state.

Hope this is somewhat useful :) Charles Edward (Talk) 04:26, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here is some more, this is a pretty good book I am reading. :)

  • Looks like it was about 1828 when the state parties first began to organize, prior to that there was only democratic republicans. [14] It appears that the 1828 election destroyed the Adams faction of the democratic republican party in the state, who then formed the Whig party. [15]
  • Noah Noble was not a whig at the time of his election. - still a jacksonian democratic republican That is an interesting thing. Perhaps we should note that somehow?[16]
  • The Democrats took both houses in 1832 and 1833. (You have to read into this one a little bit, it don't just say it) [17]
  • Whigs took both houses in 1834, or at least a coalition allied with the Whigs. It appears that party affilitation was still not concrete yet. [18] Its not clear, but it look slike it went back democratic in 1835
  • Whigs took the state again in 1836 [19]
  • In 1840 the house was 78 whigs to 22 democrats, senate was 31 whigs to 15 democrats. [20]

Charles Edward (Talk) 18:57, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Territorial officials?[edit]

Indiana's territorial Governors, Secretaries of State, Treasurers, and Auditors are listed in the articles on their respective offices; what do you all think about adding them to this article? Qqqqqq (talk) 19:23, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

These positions (at least Governor) were appointed by the president and were not elected. They do not have to do with the party strength of the state's citizens. Reywas92Talk 19:46, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, that's true. They apparently did have political party affiliations, though. Were each of these offices popularly elected since statehood? Qqqqqq (talk) 20:06, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Source of General Assembly numbers?[edit]

No source seems to be given; a cursory glance at the composition after the 1896 elections shows no third party members, though 9 are listed here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.242.126.140 (talk) 01:52, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]