Talk:Highland Land League

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Crofter MPs[edit]

I believe five Crofter MPs were elcted in 1886. At present the article names four, and their constituncies. I am pretty sure the fifth was not elected from Sutherlandshire. Might have been the Northern Burghs constituency. Laurel Bush 11:16, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC).

Sutherlandshire (Angus Sutherland) did return a Crofter MP in 1886.

Centrality to Highland History[edit]

i think that this group was instrumental in getting a fairer deal for ordinary people in the north of Scotland, and can be seen as a distant ancestor of the Scottish devolution movement, and indirectly the SNP, and the Labour party in certain parts of northern Scotland. The page probably needs a lot more referencing.--MacRusgail (talk) 18:06, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Sutherland Association[edit]

There is a reference on the net to a cairn erected at Gartymore on the croft of John Fraser, a leading light of the land reform movement, the first branch of the Sutherland association, the parent of the Highland Land League. These men by their efforts succeeded in the Highland Land League.

There are several references to the Sutherland Association. One was it was estd abt 1865 (39th Anniversary of the association was in 1904). Another is that the foundation of the Sutherland Association in 1882 was a curtain-raiser to ... and the Sutherland Association and the Highland Land Law Reform Association ...BeckenhamBear (talk) 09:32, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Highland Land League/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

A generous Top importance. Little added since last assessment, but C was not in use then. Using headings amy help identify gaps. Finavon (talk) 17:04, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The rationale for the "top" importance is that the HLL was instrumental in getting a fairer deal for crofters in the Highlands and Islands, so I'd say it affects the economy of this whole area, even today...--MacRusgail (talk) 18:02, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 18:02, 27 September 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 17:54, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

You have to remember that assessments are to allow Wikiprojects to set a priority for Wikipedians to work on, they're not really about the "lingering historical importance" of the subject of the article. And normally an article that was only getting ~10 views per day would be a low priority compared to the many other articles competing for a limited resource of editor attention. Tops are really rare, they're eg less than 0.1% of all Scotland articles, they are generally the big "overview" articles like Politics of Scotland. You have to be really careful setting Wikiproject priorities on what our readers want rather than according to some personal political agenda. FlagSteward (talk) 17:31, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Highland Land League. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:46, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]