Talk:German destroyer Z22 Anton Schmitt

German destroyer Z22 Anton Schmitt has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 9, 2018. (Reviewed version).

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime / European / German / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:German destroyer Z22 Anton Schmitt/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 19:29, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do this one too. Parsecboy (talk) 19:29, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Images check out
Looks like your Construction and career header needs to be adjusted a level higher
- Oops.
I think you need a comma after Schmidt in Anton Schmitt who was"
You might specify that 24 September 1939 was a few weeks after the start of WWII. Parsecboy (talk) 19:57, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- I did already in the lede. Is that not enough? Thanks for the quick turnaround.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:29, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - I tend to err on the side of repeating things in the intro and the body, on the assumption that not everyone will read both. Up to you, I guess. Parsecboy (talk) 20:54, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    - That's perfectly reasonable in a longer article, but this one's pretty short.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:57, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      - Fair enough, I'll pass this now. Parsecboy (talk) 21:58, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]