Talk:A. Dirk Moses

A. Dirk Moses was nominated as a History good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (March 25, 2023, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Queensland Low‑importance

	Australia portal A. Dirk Moses is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:A. Dirk Moses/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: David Eppstein (talk · contribs) 22:33, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly notable, but far too much of the article is unsourced. In "Early life and education", the first paragraph has a source that does not verify any information in the paragraph, and the later description of his dissertation is unsourced. In "Career", the named professorship, and the entire second and third paragraphs, are unsourced, and in addition violate our external link policy on not having external links in the main text of an article. In "Research", the first three paragraphs are entirely unsourced. The publication list is unsourced (good sources for much of this would be published book reviews).

Earwig found significant textual overlap with https://www.ccny.cuny.edu/profiles/dirk-moses, https://www.dirkmoses.com/, https://www.ucd.ie/warstudies/members/internationaladvisoryboard/dirkmoses/, and https://theconversation.com/profiles/dirk-moses-285397, enough to suggest the strong possibility that text was copied and pasted from there.

References [1] and [4] are books by Moses; they are not reliable sources about Moses. Several other sources appear to be self-written web autobiographies by Moses. There are no in-depth reliable independent sources about Moses, written by other people. Per WP:ABOUTSELF we can use self-written sources for non-controversial factual statements about the subject like degrees and career milestones but we cannot use them for anything evaluative. Without better sources we can only have a bare-bones article giving the skeleton of his life but nothing about his accomplishments or research, not complete enough to be a Good Article.

This appears to be a GAFAIL on both criteria 1 (a very long way from being properly sourced) and 2 (copyvio). —David Eppstein (talk) 22:33, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]