Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Volcanoes

	WikiProject Volcanoes
Main page talk Archives: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 Departments Assessment talk Bibliography talk Categorization talk Category talk History talk Images talk Members talk Join talk Welcome talk Portal talk Articles Featured work talk Open tasks talk Popular pages talk

kawah-ijen hydrochloric or sulphuric acid?

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/01/140130-kawah-ijen-blue-flame-volcanoes-sulfur-indonesia-pictures/

List of volcanoes in the United States needs some attention

The subsections of the List of volcanoes in the United States article need some attention. There are a number of unsourced entries that have been tacked on by an editor, outside of the existing tables. These entries lack elevation and location information.—Myasuda (talk) 01:02, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Featured article review for Yellowstone

I have nominated Yellowstone National Park for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 05:19, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

RFC on whether citing maps and graphs is original research

Please see Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#RFC on using maps and charts in Wikipedia articles. Rschen7754 15:37, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

The RFC, now at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Using maps as sources, has questions related to notability. --Rschen7754 06:12, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Stromboli

There is currently a discussion on Talk:Stromboli about splitting the article into Mount Stromboli which is currently a redirect. Volcanoguy 23:11, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Needed volcanoes and igneous landforms in North America!

There are lots of these magmatic intrusions (that means volcanoes and igneous landforms) that need to be drafted and added to Wikipedia. In Lassen Volcanic National Park, I know we've got Lassen Peak, Chaos Crags, Mount Tehama, and a few other volcanoes in the area are Wikipedia-documented, but there are several cool volcanoes in the area, including stratovolcanoes, that need to be added. Like Latour Butte, Mount Harkness, Hat Mountain, several prominent peaks, Inskip Hill, Freaner Peak, and several other volcanoes across North America need to be added ASAP! Sorry if I sound in a rush, I just want Wikipedia to be even better than it currently is! Volcano]]User talk:TheEarlyVolcanologist2023 12 April 2023

Project-independent quality assessments

Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 22:24, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Mount Kenya

Mount Kenya has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:22, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Mount Vesuvius

Mount Vesuvius has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 16:51, 10 May 2023 (UTC)