Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Technology
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiProject Technology page. |
|
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 90 days ![]() |
WikiProject Technology | (Rated Project-class) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
||
Requested move at Talk:SanDisk Sansa#Requested move 19 April 2022[edit]
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:SanDisk Sansa#Requested move 19 April 2022 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.
Requested move at Talk:IRIVER#Requested move 20 April 2022[edit]
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:IRIVER#Requested move 20 April 2022 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.
Reliability of CNET[edit]
This is a notice that per WP:RSN#Beware: CNet running AI-generated articles, byline "CNet Money", there is consensus that CNET is no longer considered a reliable source. Thank you for your attention. InfiniteNexus (talk) 18:43, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement![edit]
Hello, |
Signups open for The Core Contest[edit]
The Core Contest—Wikipedia's most exciting contest—will take place this year from April 15 to May 31. The goal: to improve vital or other core articles, with a focus on those in the worst state of disrepair. Editing can be done individually, but in the past groups have also successfully competed. There is £300 of prize money divided among editors who provide the "best additive encyclopedic value". Signups are open now. Cheers from the judges, Femke, Casliber, Aza24.
If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core Contest, please add or remove yourself from the delivery list.
Child projects[edit]
A number of broad-scope child projects are listed. Do we want all articles in these child project to have the {{WikiProject Technology}} banner? ~Kvng (talk) 14:32, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
AI boom[edit]
Hi all, just wondering if any of you would be interested in expanding the AI boom article that was created recently. It's a bit short and needs more info regarding reactions (such as the recent petition to halt AI development for six months) and some other stuff. 124.179.133.128 (talk) 12:29, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Project-independent quality assessments[edit]
Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class=
parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom
parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 17:26, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:IPhone 6S#Requested move 3 May 2023[edit]
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:IPhone 6S#Requested move 3 May 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. – MaterialWorks 14:51, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Engine infoboxes[edit]
Combustion engines are used in many applications - Aerospace, automotive, marine and industrial. Some articles on them have infobox templates; {{infobox aircraft engine}} (aviation), {{Infobox engine}} (automotive) and {{Infobox rocket engine}} (spaceflight). Wikipedia's wider community has a consensus to merge infobox templates where possible. Various aircraft infobox templates are being merged, and the question has arisen, should the aero engine infobox be merged in with them, or would it be better to merge and extend the existing engine infoboxes? There is an ongoing discussion here , which you are invited to join. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 05:24, 14 May 2023 (UTC)