Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Poetry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject Poetry (Rated NA-class)
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
NA This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Wong Phui Nam[edit]

Hello, I have recently expanded the article Wong Phui Nam, which while not tagged I believe would fit within this Wikiproject. I would be grateful for any edits or input from those more familiar about writing about poets in an encyclopaedic style. Best, CMD (talk) 16:06, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]



You've been collectively whacked with a hover of wet trouts.

For the state of the page Poet, as noted at Wikipedia:Articles for improvement/Nominations  Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 13:34, 9 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This project has been mostly inactive for about a decade now. Good luck with your fish. --Midnightdreary (talk) 16:48, 9 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Featured Article Save Award for H.D.[edit]

There is a Featured Article Save Award nomination at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review/H.D./archive2. Please join the discussion to recognize and celebrate editors who helped assure this article would retain its featured status. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:34, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

RfC over whether or not James Joyce should have an infobox[edit]

Talk:James Joyce § Should the article have an infobox I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 20:41, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This article appears to be part of this project, but the talk page does include the project banner. Also, the article has no categories. (talk) 06:12, 3 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi 76.14, you should feel free to tag the article for both! I've done so here. czar 06:38, 3 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Project-independent quality assessments[edit]

Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 20:47, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]