Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pittsburgh
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
 | WikiProject Pittsburgh was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 25 March 2013. |
Please add any Pittsburgh-related articles that need to be created, addressed or improved, in addition to general tasks. When adding an existing article, ensure that the article is catalogued for the project by adding {{pghproj}} to the article's talk page.
|
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Disputed removal of large swaths of sourced material in Greater Pittsburgh Area[edit]
I've started a section here to contest the recent removal of large amounts of what I feel is reasonably sourced material. I'm posting here to solicit additional input from members of this project. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:40, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
User script to detect unreliable sources[edit]
I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (
John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)
and turns it into something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Requested move: Acrisure Stadium → Heinz Field[edit]
A requested move is under discussion at Talk:Acrisure Stadium § Requested move 22 July 2022. ––FormalDude talk 21:15, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Bridges in Pittsburgh[edit]
In case anyone is interested, I've started a talk topic at Template talk:Pittsburgh Bridges#Category sorting about an issue with category sorting for Pittsburgh Bridge articles. --Jameboy (talk) 17:07, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:7:11AM 11.20.1979 79°55'W 40°27'N#Requested move 4 January 2024[edit]
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:7:11AM 11.20.1979 79°55'W 40°27'N#Requested move 4 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 06:14, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
FAR for PNC Park[edit]
I have nominated PNC Park for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm Talk 20:13, 22 March 2024 (UTC)