Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Languages

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconEssays High‑impact
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.
HighThis page has been rated as High-impact on the project's impact scale.
Note icon
The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

WikiProject iconLanguages Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Discussion on Talk:Romance languages: Representation of Classical Latin–Vulgar Latin split in infobox?[edit]

If anyone here is interested in this discussion, it can be found at Talk:Romance languages#Representation of Classical Latin–Vulgar Latin split in infobox? Arctic Circle System (talk) 09:56, 11 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Halmahera Sea languages#Requested move 11 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:12, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Maden language#Requested move 11 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:12, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good article reassessment for Wagiman language[edit]

Wagiman language has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:22, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Is Beary a language or dialect?[edit]

Please join the discussion at Talk:Beary language#Language or dialect?. The Doom Patrol (talk) 14:01, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Kurdish languages#Requested move 15 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ModernDayTrilobite (talkcontribs) 17:45, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Tholo language#Requested move 15 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. – Hilst [talk] 12:57, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

New proposal to new format[edit]

Looking from an overall perspective, I would like to request the lead sentence need to be followed consistently like this sample: [The uppercase letter] or [The lowercase letter] is the [position] letter in the Latin alphabet, used in the modern Latin alphabet... We should strive on consistency than anything else, as in B, the article denotes that it comes from the Latin-script, not Latin. While it may sound similar, note that each link either directs to different pages. Please start seeking for a new change or stay inconsistent on alphabetical articles. 2001:EE0:4BC8:DF00:B50C:773B:1A40:16BA (talk) 11:36, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

While consistency is often a valid concern, it does have its limits. Not every letter of the modern Latin alphabet has the same history, in particular, I/J, U/V, and W. Our first concerns should continue to be: Is the content of an article supported by reliable sources? What do those sources say about the history of each letter? Does it present a neutral point of view with due weight for valid (well sourced) interpretations of the history? After that, we can take regard of the Manual of Style, which specifically allows latitude in how articles are written. Frankly, I am more concerned that articles in Wikipedia are well sourced, written in an encyclopedic style, and reader-friendly, then I am about consistency of wording. Donald Albury 16:33, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Paleo-Balkan languages[edit]

A clarification is needed at Balkans regarding the so-called Paleo-Balkan languages. A user has added Albanian, Greek, and other Palaeo-Balkan languages, had their formative core in the Balkans after the Indo-European migrations in the region. sourced to Lazaridis et al. 2022 [1], which, however uses the wording These steppe migrants soon admixed with locals to create a tapestry of diverse ancestry from which speakers of Greek, Paleo-Balkan, and Albanian languages emerged., clearly distinguishing the modern Greek and Albanian languages from Paleo-Balkan. I've opened a discussion at Talk:Balkans, but additional community input from users versed in linguistics would be very helpful. Khirurg (talk) 16:32, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

We could use someone who speaks and reads Hungarian at WP:BLPN# Róbert Cey-Bert[edit]

He had an article on hu.wiki which was deleted, the same editor has created their BLP here. I saw something concerning at a VP and posted to BLPN. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 11:40, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notice

The article Forlivese dialect has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

"There is no Romagnol dialect, but an infinity of Romagnol dialects decreasing from place to place, as continuous variations on a common basis." There is definitely a place on Wikipedia for documenting the Forlivese idiosyncracies of the Romagnol dialect, which is discussed in multiple WP:RS, though it is something that this stub presently does not begin to discuss. But these peculiarities are best treated at Romagnol, unless we are going to make an article about the dialectal idiosyncracies of 70+ municipalities of Romagna. (To my knowledge, no other municipality in Romagna has yet been afforded an article on its dialect.)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. IgnatiusofLondon (talk) 14:28, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

New parameter on infobox language discussion[edit]

There is a discussion on new parameter on infobox language at Template talk:Infobox language#new parameter for de jure recognition of certain language that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Ckfasdf (talk) 02:17, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]