Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Electrical engineering
| WikiProject Electrical engineering Navigation | |
|---|---|
| Main page | Discussions | Project templates | Assessment | Portal | | |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiProject Electrical engineering page. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2 |
| WikiProject Electrical engineering | (Rated Project-class) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||
| 1, 2 |
Merger discussion for Negawatt market[edit]
An article that you have been involved in editing—Negawatt market—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Chidgk1 (talk) 17:26, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Merger discussion for Demand response[edit]
An article that you have been involved in editing—Demand response—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Chidgk1 (talk) 13:09, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Need your thoughts on whether this should be a separate topic from Noise cancellation or Adaptive filtering. It appears to be someone's research material. Please help discuss at Draft:Adaptive noise cancelling#Notability for this. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:51, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- Active noise control almost always involves adaptation. No need for a separate article. Constant314 (talk) 19:37, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- This is the same as Active noise control. The author should be directed to improve the existing article. I've read the explanation provided by the author attempting to present a distinction between the two, however I'm unconvinced. It appears that different groups of researchers use each phrase to refer to the same concept. SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 21:27, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Electricity[edit]
Electricity has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 00:17, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- This is still ongoing. Would anyone like to poke at it and maybe bring it to a successful conclusion? A few {{citation needed}} tags need resolving. XOR'easter (talk) 00:26, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Project-independent quality assessments[edit]
Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 19:43, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
New discussion at Talk:Heaviside condition#Is the Heaviside condition the Zeno's paradox of transmission lines?[edit]
There is a new discussion at Talk:Heaviside condition#Is the Heaviside condition the Zeno's paradox of transmission lines? in which you may wish to participate. Constant314 (talk) 15:54, 14 April 2023 (UTC)