Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Economics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconEconomics NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
NAThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Hélène Rey[edit]

I've added some initial discussion of the contributions of Prof. Hélène Rey here: [1]. There's a lot more that can be added, if anyone's familiar with her work and contributions.

To what extent does gross private domestic investment determine the rate of growth?[edit]

The article on gross private domestic investment says it "is an important component of GDP because it provides an indicator of the future productive capacity of the economy." To what extent does GPDI actually determine the rate of growth?

Please answer at Talk:Economic growth#To what extent does gross private domestic investment determine the rate of growth? thanks. EllenCT (talk)

Davos question listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Davos question. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.

Hey folks! I just created this article and it was moved to the draft-space before I added the references :-/ Could anyone review it and help out with moving it to the article-space? Thanks Fede.Campana (talk)

That's the link for easy access: Draft:Richard Duncan (economist) Fede.Campana (talk)

Proposed deletion of Energy quality[edit]

Bruce J. McFarlane[edit]

I recently created an article for Australian economist Bruce J. McFarlane. Any help with expansion would be appreciated. Thriley (talk) 19:55, 1 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. I have improved several articles about Turkey but economics is far too difficult for me. As it is rated top importance for your project is there any chance one of you could improve the economy of Turkey article? That would likely help me with other Turkey articles which are related to the economy. Also Turkish economic crisis (2018–current) is marked high importance for you but is in pretty bad shape if any of you have time to work on it Chidgk1 (talk) 14:13, 10 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good article reassessment for Eagle Cash[edit]

Eagle Cash has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:40, 11 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I recently created an article for Isabella Weber. Any help with improving the article would be appreciated. Best, Thriley (talk) 14:49, 14 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Template talk:Economic systems sidebar § Remove "Communism" from the list of Major types at the top. –Vipz (talk) 01:44, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tavneet Suri[edit]

I recently drafted an article on MIT Sloan's Tavneet Suri (Draft:Tavneet Suri). Any feedback or editing would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. RegMonkey (talk) 21:24, 28 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reorientating the Wikipedia Degrowth article[edit]

Instead of my original idea, I have added two sections 'Evidence of the Degrowth Mindset Shift', with lots of relevant references. Than an explanation about 'The Carrying Capacity of Earth'. I would be grateful if someone could revisit my draft Wikipedia article about the 'UN Charter for Ecological Justice', so that I can link these two related topics. .

Bbwilliams (talk) 07:59, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This doesn't look appropriate to me, it has serious WP:N and WP:NPOV issues. The article Degrowth could indeed use some work, but I don't think this is the right step at this point. - CRGreathouse (t | c) 14:11, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I agree and have written something similar on the talk page of Degrowth now. EMsmile (talk) 21:19, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Indeed, WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY is central. - CRGreathouse (t | c) 02:23, 7 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
please see alternative approach applied in situ Bbwilliams (talk) 16:09, 7 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
That's an improvement, but still not suitable as written, kind of a WP:SYNTHesis. But I can definitely see this material being used to improve the article. Why don't you take this to the article's Talk page and see if you can hash something out? - CRGreathouse (t | c) 20:24, 7 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks for this advice. I intend to negotiate forward on the Degrowth talk page. Bbwilliams (talk) 08:27, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Degrowth and Eco-economic decoupling articles[edit]

Moved from the project page to the talk page, content by User:Bbwilliams:

"I have added a paragraph covering I=PAT and Jevons paradox, into the article 'Eco-economic decoupling'. See relevant talk page for details.

I am also suggesting a more lenient approach to the Degrowth entry, to allow folks to more fully understand this paradigm shift in thinking and why it is urgently needed. Details are in this free Medium article, you will need to sign into medium to access it" EMsmile (talk) 07:56, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I started this discussion: Talk:Progressivity in United States income tax#Various polls by media organizations. George Ho (talk) 05:09, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FAR for Harold Innis[edit]

I have nominated Harold Innis for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 01:28, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Eyes on new user’s edits[edit]

The editing behaviour of this user is worrying. Large amount of text, which is undue or unrelated to the subjects, is being copied to many different pages. Much cleanup maybe needed. --Dustfreeworld (talk) 03:55, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

History of private equity and venture capital has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:15, 8 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Help beefing up Gig economy[edit]

This was in article space for a month and a half before being redirected to Temporary work for a year and a half and gig worker for 4 years. Since the gig economy is composed of corporate entities, gig workers and customers, we need to distinguish this article from gig workers. This will appear on the main page in a couple of weeks or months in the WP:DYK section. Please help beef it up.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:40, 8 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Proposal to add Shopping as Level 4 vital article[edit]

An article of possible interest to members of this Wikiproject is under discussion. Please consider joining the conversation at Wikipedia talk:Vital articles/Level/4#Add Shopping 5. (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 21:26, 12 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement![edit]

Please note that Economy of South America, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the Articles for improvement. The article is scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing!
Delivered by MusikBot talk 00:05, 26 February 2024 (UTC) on behalf of the AFI teamReply[reply]