Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Disaster management
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiProject Disaster management page. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3 |
| WikiProject Disaster management | (Rated Project-class) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||
February 2015 North American cold wave listed at Requested moves[edit]
A requested move discussion has been initiated for February 2015 North American cold wave to be moved to February 2015 Eastern North America cold wave. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. Graham (talk) 02:34, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Hurricane Juan Featured article review[edit]
I have nominated Hurricane Juan for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:08, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Merge request at Munich Massacre[edit]
There is a merge request at Talk:Munich Massacre that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Any input would be very welcome! Felix QW (talk) 17:16, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
1995 Aigio earthquake peer review[edit]
Hello, I have listed the 1995 Aigio earthquake for Peer Review at Wikipedia:Peer_review/1995_Aigio_earthquake/archive1 as prep for FAC, and I would greatly appreciate it if everyone could leave some comments on what can be improved in the article. Thank you, SamBroGaming (talk) 01:31, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement![edit]
 Hello, |
GAR notice[edit]
2007 Balad aircraft crash has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:03, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:2012 Middle East respiratory syndrome outbreak#Requested move 1 January 2023[edit]
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2012 Middle East respiratory syndrome outbreak#Requested move 1 January 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. echidnaLives - talk - edits 02:35, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Buncefield fire[edit]
Buncefield fire has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Femke (alt) (talk) 08:48, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
FAR[edit]
The article 1994 Fairchild Air Force Base B-52 crash is currently under featured article review. You can leave comments at Wikipedia:Featured article review/1994 Fairchild Air Force Base B-52 crash/archive1. Desertarun (talk) 10:03, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
1994 Fairchild Air Force Base B-52 crash Featured article review[edit]
User:Deserarun has nominated 1994 Fairchild Air Force Base B-52 crash for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 11:20, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Project-independent quality assessments[edit]
Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 16:46, 10 April 2023 (UTC)