Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Central America
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiProject Central America page. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2 |
| WikiProject Central America | (Rated NA-class) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||
Question about assessment[edit]
- Is it OK if the List of Presidents of Nicaragua were changed from Start quality to "C" quality? — Preceding unsigned comment added by P,TO 19104 (talk • contribs) 22:38, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Category:WikiProject Central America projects has been nominated for renaming[edit]
Category:WikiProject Central America projects has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —andrybak (talk) 04:42, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Category:Central America articles needing expert attention has been nominated for discussion[edit]
Category:Central America articles needing expert attention has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 06:47, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red Latin America contest[edit]
Beginning July 1 and running through the end of September, WikiProject Women in Red is hosting a Latin America contest. Members of this WikiProject and all others interested are warmly welcomed to join us in this effort to improve English Wikipedia’s coverage of the women of Latin America. You can join at any time and barnstars will be awarded to the leaders of each month as well as the full three-month period. Hope to see you there! Innisfree987 (talk) 19:18, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
User script to detect unreliable sources[edit]
I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (
John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)
and turns it into something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)