Wikipedia:XfD today

This page transcludes all of the deletion debates opened today on the English-language Wikipedia, including articles, categories, templates, and others, as a convenience to XfD-watchers. Please note that because this material is transcluded, watchlisting this page will not provide you with watchlist updates about deletions; WP:DELT works best as a browser bookmark checked regularly.

Speedy deletion candidates

Candidates for speedy deletion

108 Blessed Polish Martyrs

Draft:30 Days of Night (franchise) (2)

Amador Fire Protection District

Baitush Sharaf Adarsha Kamil Madrasah

Draft:Breastfeeding Aversion Response

User:Dfojhelum/sandbox

Template:Draft submission

IDMERIT

James Andrew King'

Kashmir Age

Priyatama (disambiguation)

SweepSouth

Tarla

Draft:Veritell Inspection Co.,Ltd

Draft:Zach Mecelis

Articles

Guide to deletion

Burdickville, Rhode Island

Burdickville, Rhode Island (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

Unsourced, could not find anything to establish this as a real or notable place. –dlthewave ☎ 16:24, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Rhode Island. –dlthewave ☎ 16:24, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
• Keep. I found this reference: "Burdickville: Rhode Island Blueways". exploreri.org. Retrieved 2023-05-07. Google Maps shows Burdickville with boundaries, not just as a point, and there is a Burdickville Road. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:16, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
• Redirect to Hopkinton, Rhode Island#Geography. While it did exist, it does not appear to have ever had official recognition and does not satisfy WP:NGEO. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:39, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
• comment I found a "census" listing from 1885 which named this as a town. Also, the presence of the dam would indicate a mill of some sort in the past. That siad the documentation is extremely scanty. Mangoe (talk) 03:12, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
• Keep: I found some additional sourcing and content to add. if anyone has free newsbank access, the original of that Aug 23, 1931 article I cite can be pulled, as well as others, it looks like at [1].--Milowent • ^hasspoken 17:17, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 05:04, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:09, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. More opinions are welcome.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timothytyy (talk) 10:25, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Statue of Elon Musk

Statue of Elon Musk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

The statue is not notable by itself, but was covered in press as everything else related to Musk. One line in the main article on Musk should be enough to cover it. Artem.G (talk) 09:13, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Artem.G (talk) 09:13, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
• Delete 2 sentences worth of content, from an unreliable source. --TheInsatiableOne (talk) 09:23, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Sky Hawk Times

Sky Hawk Times (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

The article does not provide a single reliable source for in-depth media coverage BoraVoro (talk) 08:01, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and Punjab. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:13, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Jessie Zhao

Jessie Zhao (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

The article does not provide a single reliable source for in-depth media coverage. Fails notability and anybio guidelines BoraVoro (talk) 07:59, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Fashion, and New York. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:14, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Hasan Doğan (politician)

Hasan Doğan (politician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Assyrtiko (talk) 06:46, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Turkey. Assyrtiko (talk) 06:46, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Kawthekar High School

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Kawthekar High School
• Articles for deletion/Kawthekar High School (2nd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/Kawthekar High School (3rd nomination)

Kawthekar High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

Since the last 2 AfDs we are a lot stricter on schools. This one fails WP:NSCHOOL for lack of coverage. LibStar (talk) 00:01, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Maharashtra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:04, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
•  Info - Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it was previously discussed at AfD and the result was keep.

Previous discussions: 2011-09 (closed as ✓ keep) ← 2011-05 (closed as ✓ keep)

Logs: 2011-05 ↻ restored ← 2011-05 ✗ PROD

--Cewbot (talk) 00:05, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:39, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Agreed, the article in question fails to meet style guidelines, employs poor grammar, and has questionable notability. Alexcs114 (talk) 07:42, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

List of children of vice presidents of the United States

List of children of vice presidents of the United States (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

Most vice presidential children are not notable in their own right. Interstellarity (talk) 23:43, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people, Politics, and United States of America. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:03, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

• Keep - Well-crafted encyclopedic list. Carrite (talk) 09:45, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

* Keep - While the article does require some work, it is inherently useful to have some additional information about the family of some of America's most notable politicians. Alexcs114 (talk) 07:45, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

I replied to the wrong person, sorry Alexcs114 (talk) 07:45, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

• Delete - I question when this would be useful. The overwhelming majority of Vice President’s children aren’t terribly important or are known for other things.

TheRealJT1743 (talk) 22:32, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discussion about whether WP:NLIST is met might be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:39, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

• Keep per Carrite. I don't see any reason to delete this. WP:NOTINHERITED doesn't apply here because this is a list rather than a specific child. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 06:46, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

The Last Monk

The Last Monk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

No coverage in reliable sources. TrangaBellam (talk) 07:59, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. TrangaBellam (talk) 07:59, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
• Keep: Was screened at Cannes in 2006.[2] There was coverage in the offline editions of India Today[3] and The Hollywood Reporter[4]. 2001:8F8:172B:51C3:547B:97A1:5FF6:9790 (talk) 16:52, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

  Being screened at Cannes — alongside sixty five (!) other films in the Indian pavillion — confers no automatic passage of notability. There would have been some merit in your argument if the film was atleast in the long list for any award.

  The Hollywood Reporter catalogs every single movie screened at Cannes (or any other festival of some repute) and this is no exception. The details — cast, plot, runtime, etc. — are sourced from the filmmakers themselves; the coverage is not even independent. TrangaBellam (talk) 21:18, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

• Keep per 2001:8F8:172B:51C3:547B:97A1:5FF6:9790.There is coverage.Zealspar100 (talk) 11:52, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

• Keep per 2001:8F8:172B:51C3:547B:97A1:5FF6:9790. The article would greatly benefit from improvements though.

Alexcs114 (talk) 07:54, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Outer Limits (band)

Outer Limits (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

Left a PROD last month which was removed, and I guess I missed that but we're here now. All I remember is what I wrote at the time: "Zero evidence of notability found." Couldn't tell you anything else about my BEFORE search at the time, but I trust I was reasonably thorough enough to justify bringing this back. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 07:01, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Japan. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 07:01, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:04, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:31, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

• Delete per JML1148 Alexcs114 (talk) 07:57, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Notified: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music#AfD notice. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 05:42, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:GNG with no sources, I couldn't find any additional sources online either. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 06:49, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Defeminization and masculinization

Defeminization and masculinization (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

Uncited since 2007 - with political hot topics in the USA it is important for Wikipedia to have verifiable info on sex and gender Chidgk1 (talk) 09:08, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Chidgk1 (talk) 09:08, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
• Merge into Sexual differentiation. I'm not a biologist, so very much an outsider's perspective, but there is quite a bit of published research available on this. I'm not sure if there's a case for having a third article in addition to defeminization and virilization (masculinization). The topic is certainly notable, but the information across these three articles might be better reorganized into 1 or 2 articles. As it stands, I would probably favor merging the article into virilization#Prenatal virilization or sexual differentiation. Would be good to have someone weigh in with a knowledge of developmental biology, though. --Tserton (talk) 12:13, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

If the result ends up being "keep", I would volunteer to clean up this article and cite it properly. Will wait for the outcome before I do so, though. --Tserton (talk) 12:16, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Thank you whichever way it goes Chidgk1 (talk) 13:24, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Biology and Medicine. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:43, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liamyangll (talk to me!) 04:49, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

• Comment I think there probably should be one article containing info currently dispersed across or missing in defeminization, virilization and Defeminization and masculinization (agree with Tserton) with a Further-wikilink to it in Sexual differentiation. However, since this article is uncited it's not really useful for merging – instead copy it to the Talk page of whatever becomes the comprehensive article on this (possibly in a collapsed template so it doesn't hide other Talk page contents).

Prototyperspective (talk) 09:29, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Sounds good - I would be happy to copy this to a talk page. Which article talk page please? Chidgk1 (talk) 09:32, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discussion is great but I'm looking for more specific directions that a discussion closer can act on.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:27, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Ariadaha Kalachand High School

Ariadaha Kalachand High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL. The sources present are either primary, or school/college databases. A WP:BEFORE search didn't turn up anything useful. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:31, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and West Bengal. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:31, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
• Weak keep - There are articles in multiple RSN such as The Times of India, Times Now, ABP Live (Bengali), News 18 (Bengali) and Eisamay (Bengali) that are dedicated to covering a unsavoury incident that has happened at the school in 2022. - Sohom Datta (talk) 04:19, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:25, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Posey (given name)

Posey (given name) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

recent creation - this is the same as Posy (given name no need to fork Gugrak (talk) 05:20, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Oppose. This particular article is distinct because the spellings are different and the name is probably also related to the surname. If anything, this particular article should be merged with Posey (surname) into one article called Posey (name) as I originally intended. See the talk page. Bookworm857158367 (talk) 05:26, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

• Merge to Posy (given name), as best solution for the readers, who will probably know if something is a given name or a surname, but may not always be certain of the spelling: having the similar first names all on one page is then the easiest. Whether the given name is related to the surname seems to be pure speculation. Fram (talk) 06:56, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

  The two people listed under the Posey article are both men and both use the same spelling as the surname, which has multiple origins per the cited source. I don’t have the sources for the bios of these men handy, but it would not be surprising if Posey was a mother’s maiden name or a surname belonging to a family friend or some other family member, as is typical for such usage in the 19th century. Someone can probably find the documentation. As a female name, it is referring to a flower or a nickname for Josephine or Rosemary or Rosalind, etc., per the cited sources. Bookworm857158367 (talk) 07:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure)‎ Gugrak (talk) 05:24, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Posy (given name)

Posy (given name) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

recent creation - this is the same as Posy (given name no need to fork Gugrak (talk) 05:19, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

I’m not sure what you’re talking about here. Everything in the article is sourced and there are several articles about people with these names listed. There is absolutely no reason to delete it. Vehemently oppose. Bookworm857158367 (talk) 05:23, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Reactions to the 2023 Turkish presidential election

Reactions to the 2023 Turkish presidential election (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

WP:N; unnecessary based on precedence. We've never created entire pages of reactions for elections as far as I can tell, even for larger nations such as the USA and France, or similarly regional powers such as Argentina. The only remotely similar article I can find deals with that of Belarus in 2020, which was deemed notable due to the divided claims of victory and massive protests following. With most of this article being simple congratulations, it can be far more appropriately addressed on the election page. The Kip (talk) 05:06, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

• Delete: Entirely unnecessary article.

Alexcs114 (talk) 08:02, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

• Delete Unnecessary, no demonstration that the reaction are notable enough for their own article. — Czello ^(music) 08:18, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Turkey. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:14, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Double House (manga)

Double House (manga) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

No evidence of notability. The article only relies on primary sources (the own manga volumes). Xexerss (talk) 04:12, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Anime and manga and Japan. Xexerss (talk) 04:12, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

• Delete The article fails to meet WP:N, and I was only able to find one non-primary source about this manga.

Alexcs114 (talk) 08:07, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Waxworker (talk) 08:28, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

North Macedonia–Peru relations

North Macedonia–Peru relations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

Article is largely based on 1 source. The topic of these relations does not receive significant coverage in multiple sources. Relations don't include aspects that typically add to notability like embassies, 1 high level visit in 17 years of relations, significant trade (Peruvian exports to the state have been nonexistent in the years 2009, 2012, 2014 and 2016. } or migration LibStar (talk) 04:02, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, North Macedonia, and Peru. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:18, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Montenegro–Peru relations

Montenegro–Peru relations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

Article is largely based on 1 source. The topic of these relations does not receive significant coverage in multiple sources. Relations don't include aspects that typically add to notability like embassies, state visits, significant trade or migration. LibStar (talk) 03:53, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Montenegro, and Peru. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:19, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Zettagrid

Zettagrid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. References fail WP:ORGCRIT and I find nothing else in a BEFORE search to fix it. While not a reason for AfD, page is spam and created and edited by same SPA editor along with ZettaNet which has been prodded. CNMall41 (talk) 03:50, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology, and Australia. CNMall41 (talk) 03:50, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

• delete and salt the earth as we used to say... Andre🚐 03:52, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:54, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Jean Dubuis

Jean Dubuis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

The references are Mr. Dubuis's own writings and other such primary sources. I looked for better ones and found only self-published or dubious-seeming books on alchemy and esoteric spirituality. gnu57 03:43, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. gnu57 03:43, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:13, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
• Keep "dubious-seeming books on alchemy and esoteric spirituality" are appropriate references for this topic. If you can add them in that would do as independent references. I added in an independent external link, that is about a third of what is needed for GNG proof. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:48, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:53, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

House of Mónek

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/House of Mónek (2nd nomination)

House of Mónek (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

The notability of the article is not verified by references to reliable sources. The article is based on the creator's own research of church books and passenger lists.

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 May 30. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility and Hungary. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:15, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Scott Sankey

Scott Sankey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

Fails GNG and SNG (NBAD). PROD objected by User:Florentyna but issues not fixed. Only non-primary source is not independent and does not provide SIGCOV. Timothytyy (talk) 02:56, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Badminton, and England. Timothytyy (talk) 02:56, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
• Delete - seems to fail WP:GNG. Badminton Europe has a single trivial mention and another mention in Abingdon. I'm not seeing any detailed coverage in WP:RS let alone the multiple sources required. On top of that, the achievements are nowhere near the WP:NBAD level so there isn't even a presumption of notability from that either. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:29, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:24, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Darren Adamson

Darren Adamson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

Fails GNG and SNG (NBAD). PROD objected by User:Florentyna but issues not fixed. All sources are not secondary and none provide SIGCOV. Timothytyy (talk) 02:54, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Badminton, and England. Timothytyy (talk) 02:54, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
• Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:33, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:56, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Plug and Play Tech Center

Plug and Play Tech Center (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

Clear lack of attention, WP:GNG fails. ALSTROEMERIA🌸Čijukas Kuvajamas 02:04, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Products, and California. ALSTROEMERIA🌸Čijukas Kuvajamas 02:04, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
• Comment. @Fumikas Sagisavas: did not supply a reason why the article should be deleted. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:29, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
• Comment. A quick Bing News search brings up results such as them opening a new office in Vancouver, a partnership with JetBlue, other things from sources such as MarketWatch. That being said, most of those are press releases. A lack of attention does not equate to not meeting notability requirements, and it does not seem like the nominator has done a thorough BEFORE search. If anything, the nomination relies on WP:LASTING. X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 05:57, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
• Keep: Looks notable to me. UtherSRG (talk) 15:16, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:33, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Delete coverage is all press releases and other stuff we can't use to prove notability. Kudos for this crypto spam [5], even has a fancy Eiffel Tower graphic and a quote from twitter! This just isn't notable. Oaktree b (talk) 02:48, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Keep per X750 Alexcs114 (talk) 08:12, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

• Delete - Fails WP:SIGCOV, sources are unreliable as well. --TheInsatiableOne (talk) 09:11, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Maurício Guilherme Silva Jr.

Maurício Guilherme Silva Jr. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

Article fails WP:N, WP:MINIMUM and WP:PROF. None of the source are about the author, let alone being "significant coverage". Also, the creator of this article, has a long history of WP:PAID and WP:PROMOTION and this article is yet another attempt to use WP as a means for promotion. Kacamata! ^Dimmi!!! 01:09, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors, and Brazil. Kacamata! ^Dimmi!!! 01:09, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
• Comment. He might pass WP:PROF. I added some of his publications. They are all in Portuguese, but that doesn't detract from notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:22, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

  As far as I can see in the Scholar, his work is not cited anywhere. He also fails all the other 7 points in WP:NACADEMIC. Kacamata! ^Dimmi!!! 02:29, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

  I'm not seeing any indications of passing WP:PROF, either. Merely having written things isn't enough (whatever the language); what signs are there that his writings have been influential? XOR'easter (talk) 17:13, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Minha vida de trás pra frente

Minha vida de trás pra frente (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

This another article created by Luciareis (talk · contribs) and related to this AfD. This is a case of WP:SPAM and WP:PAID. None of the sources in the article are reliable or "significant coverage" of the book. This is simply another attempt to use Wikipedia as a means for promotion. Kacamata! ^Dimmi!!! 01:01, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Brazil. Kacamata! ^Dimmi!!! 01:01, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

• Comment Source 5 looks promising, but the book's title doesn't appear in the pdf of the article at all, nor does the author's name; something looks fishy here. Oaktree b (talk) 02:39, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Delete appears to be HOAX or using sources that don't mention the book as some sort of PROMO. Not cool. Oaktree b (talk) 02:41, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Other sources are an Amazon listing for the book, a personal website, a youtube interview, and it goes downhill from there. Using self-authored sources and a sales site don't contribute to notability, source 5 is just not mentioning the book. I gave up after that. HOAX PROMO appears to be a thing now. Oaktree b (talk) 02:44, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

• Comment @Kacamata: Considering Luciareis' continued conflict of interest violations, you may want to file a report of Luciareis at WP:COIN. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 07:04, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Biraj Bhattarai

Biraj Bhattarai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

FAIL IN WP:SINGER. NO RELIABLE SOURCES Worldiswide (talk) 02:02, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 May 23. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:15, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Nepal. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:15, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. nirmal (talk) 13:24, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:28, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete Fails WP:GNG with no reliable sources. I have tagged it for speedy deletion due to unambiguous promotion. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 06:59, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

• Delete clearly fails WP:PROMOTION and WP:GNG

Alexcs114 (talk) 08:20, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Uttara Mhatre Kher

Uttara Mhatre Kher (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

Passing mentions. No evidence of Notability, Fails WP:GNG. Accesscrawl (talk) 02:12, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and India. Accesscrawl (talk) 02:12, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:15, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:28, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

A Shadow in Eternity

A Shadow in Eternity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

At present, the article only cites a single primary source. I have conducted a Google search, as well as individually searched for the book on Kirkus Reviews, Booklist, School Library Journal, Publishers Weekly, and Shelf Awareness to check for reviews or other indications of notability. I have not seen references to the book aside from from booksellers and primary sources. Significa liberdade (talk) 01:33, 30 May 2023 (UTC) Creating deletion discussion for A Shadow in Eternity

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and India. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:17, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Faust (Guilty Gear)

Faust (Guilty Gear) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

The article contains again mostly listicles/rankings and passing mentions. The only useful source per WP:BEFORE was maybe this [6], thus still failing WP:GNG. GlatorNator (ᴛ) 00:30, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Video games. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:18, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Pandit Lakhmi Chand State University of Performing and Visual Arts

Pandit Lakhmi Chand State University of Performing and Visual Arts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. Few sources, and those few are low quality. Content at this time is almost entirely promotional and largely a screed lauding the accomplishments of one person. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 00:05, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

• Delete. Article fails WP:NSCHOOL and there are only 3 sources in the entire article. More than that, the article is very promotional and could probably be CSDed for that alone. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 00:35, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
• Keep. Almost certainly notable, but the copyvio text taken from https://hshec.org/welcome/university_details/68 needs to be removed. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:51, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

  I would like to hear your opinion on the neutrality of the article, particularly this paragraph:

  The PLC SUPVA campus is spread over 36 acres of land, beautifully designed by world renowned architect Raj Rewal, with a healthy and verdant campus. It is centrally located in the state of Haryana, at a distance of about 75 kms from the national capital, 90 kms from IGI Airport, New Delhi and about 200 kms from Chandigarh, and is well-connected with the road and railway network. With magnificent buildings and state-of-art infrastructure, it has spacious seminar halls, laboratories, workshops and studios, well-equipped with latest machinery, equipment and IT infrastructure.

  I think it’s very promotional and that’s another reason it should be deleted. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 01:25, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Haryana. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:54, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
• Comment. This earlier version of the article omits the copyvios and has more references, but also has some inadequately referenced criticism of the university and its vice-chancellor. I'd suggest reverting to that older version and removing the unreferenced criticism. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:07, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

  Honestly I don't think the prose in that version is much better. It's very critical of the organisation, and is very poorly written. We have both sides of WP:NPOV, however I think the refs in the version you linked push it towards Keep but WP:TNT. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 02:04, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:17, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Files

File:Orde M. Coombs NY.png

File:Orde M. Coombs NY.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Eric Carpenter (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Image fails WP:NFCC. Per point #9, there is no sourced, critical commentary of the cover image, just a passing mention that he was on the cover. —C.Fred (talk) 03:08, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

• Delete as WP:DECORATIVE non-free use per WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and item #9 of WP:NFC#UUI. The simple descriptive statement "Coombs was featured on the cover of the November 20, 1972 issue of New York Magazine." in Orde M. Coombs#Biography isn't really even close the type of sourced critical commentary required by WP:NFCC#8. Moreover, simply adding that statement together with a {{citation needed}} template as part of the same edit so as to try and justify the file's non-free use kind shows a very superficial understanding (at best) or not only WP:NFCC but also WP:BURDEN. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:30, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Regina Jacobs Bus Stop.JPG

File:Regina Jacobs Bus Stop.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fizbin (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No freedom of panorama for 2D graphic works in the United States. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 03:12, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Categories

Category:Cypriot monarchs

• Propose renaming Category:Cypriot monarchs to Category:Monarchs of Cyprus

Nominator's rationale: WP:CATSPECIFIC to make clear "Cypriot" does not refer to the nationality of any monarch (originally) from Cyprus who may have reigned over some other country, but that "Cyprus" was the country reigned over by the monarchs in question (the Suggestion B principle). Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 10:17, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Category:Heads of state of Austria

• Propose downmerging Category:Heads of state of Austria to Category:Presidents of Austria

Nominator's rationale: Redundant layer. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 10:09, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

• Comment: Shouldn't Category:Emperors of Austria also be under there somehow? But if there's agreed intent to separate modern countries from their historical predecessors in such categories, then go ahead. --Paul_012 (talk) 10:21, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Category:Anyone (band) members

• Propose deleting Category:Anyone (band) members (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: This category had four members. Two, I could find no citations saying they were ever in the band. The other two (Davison and Hawkins) were in Sylvia, a predecessor band, rather than in Anyone, and their membership is a pretty obscure part of their histories and fails WP:CATDEF. I have thus removed the category from all 4 articles. We now have an empty category, which should be deleted. The Anyone article is a mess, with concerns over paid editing. Bondegezou (talk) 09:55, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Category:Four sons of Horus

• Propose deleting Category:Four sons of Horus (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: WP:SMALLCAT, there are no standalone articles on each of them - all are mentioned and redirected to Four sons of Horus. That article is already inside Category:Groups of Egyptian deities. Brandmeister^talk 09:04, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Category:Education in Jämtland

• Propose renaming Category:Education in Jämtland to Category:Education in Jämtland County
• Propose merging Category:Higher education in Östersund to Category:Education in Jämtland County and Category:Östersund
• Propose merging Category:Higher education in Sundsvall to Category:Education in Västernorrland County and Category:Östersund
• Propose merging Category:Education in Östersund to Category:Education in Jämtland County and Category:Östersund
• Propose deleting Category:Education in Härnösand
• Propose deleting Category:Education in Sundsvall
• Propose deleting Category:Higher education in Härnösand
• Propose deleting Category:Higher education in Jämtland
• Propose deleting Category:Higher education in Västernorrland County

Nominator's rationale: Nine categories for the category Category:Mid Sweden University and Swedish Defence University. Category:Education in Sweden by county categories would have the possibility to grow as there are more than 100 articles on different schools and universities. An alternative is to delete all as both are in Category:Universities and colleges in Sweden. Jämtland County instead of Jämtland as all articles are about education during Counties of Sweden era and not Provinces of Sweden era.

The intention is the result should be: Category:Mid Sweden University to Category:Education in Jämtland County, Category:Education in Västernorrland County, and Category:Sundsvall (already in the two other city categories); Swedish Defence University to Category:Education in Jämtland County and Category:Östersund. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 08:44, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Category:Aces

• Propose renaming Category:Aces to Category:Military aces

Nominator's rationale: For clarity, to specify what sort of Aces it refers to. Anomalous+0 (talk) 08:17, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Category:Thai Industrial Standards

• Propose merging Category:Thai Industrial Standards to Category:Standards of Thailand

Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer since the target is nearly empty. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

• Leaning keep (as category creator). I'm seeing this as a set category covering a topic notable by itself. Maybe I should get around to writing the article for the parent organisation the Thai Industrial Standards Institute, which would help make the category scope clearer. --Paul_012 (talk) 09:22, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
  On the other hand, I could do without the parent layer, since the sole member Thai units of measurement isn't about a regulated standard and doesn't really fit there. It was created much later, and before then the Thai Industrial Standards cat was directly parented under Standards by country. --Paul_012 (talk) 09:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Category:ISIRI standards

• Propose deleting Category:ISIRI standards (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: delete and move the three articles to Category:Standards of Iran, per WP:SMALLCAT, the category is mainly populated with redirects to the same list article. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:33, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Redirects

Wikipedia:XPLAIN

• Wikipedia:XPLAIN → Wikipedia:Describe a Christian religion  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I don't understand what xplain means in this case? The target was not mentioned. Q𝟤𝟪 09:56, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Assistant Attorney General

• Assistant Attorney General → United States Assistant Attorney General  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Assistant attorney general → United States Assistant Attorney General  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Assistant AG → United States Assistant Attorney General  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Retarget all to Attorney general. The United States federal government is hardly the only entity to have assistant attorneys general. In cleaning up incoming links to these redirects, I easily found more than a dozen specifying assistant attorneys general for other jurisdictions. BD2412 T 05:45, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

• Retarget per nom. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 20:28, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
• Set-indexify separately given that attorney general doesn't mention assistants at all and doesn't clarify how this differs from a Deputy Attorney General or a solicitor general. 59.149.117.119 (talk) 22:17, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
  • What would we put in such an index? None of the various states with an "Assistant Attorney General" office have an article on that office. I could see retargeting to Deputy Attorney General, which is the equivalent office. BD2412 T 01:24, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
• Retarget all to Attorney general. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:25, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Giving it a try to see if a better target arises.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 † ^edits 08:16, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Tornado and tornado outbreaks

• Tornado and tornado outbreaks → Lists of tornadoes and tornado outbreaks  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Rather unlikely search term with the repeated "tornado" Fram (talk) 07:12, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Death of Nintendo

• Death of Nintendo → Noel Comia Jr.  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Redirect from a film title to one individual cast member within it. This is generally a bad idea, and a film title should always be an article, a redlink or a redirect to its director if an article really can't be supported, and never a redirect to one individual actor in its cast. Bearcat (talk) 17:17, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

• Delete: Per nom. Redirects going to the director is what I've generally seen and it makes more sense than targeting an individual actor, so I wouldn't be opposed if someone wanted to argue the director should be the target instead. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:56, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
• Redirect to Raya Martin as director. The film has shown at Tribeca. The creator Valerie Castillo Martinez does not have a Wikipedia page yet. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 22:46, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:13, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

• Delete: Per WP:R#DELETE #10 as an article could be created for the film. voorts (talk/contributions) 02:43, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 07:02, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Democratic planning

• Democratic planning → Socialist planning  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Inappropriate target · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 05:56, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

• Retarget to Democracy - I think this is the best available target, unless someone has a better proposal. I feel there might be some article about how community planning is done by democratic voting, like the "Questions" that appear on some ballots, but I'm not sure. Democracy seems like a safe pick. Fieari (talk) 06:50, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

  Redirect to Economic planning#In socialism or Economic planning "Planning" in this context tends to refer to economic planning, not to general structural operation. "Democratic planning" is a term used by various democratic socialists, libertarian socialists, and Trotskyists to describe a planned economic system which operates on a democratic basis. I didn't realize this was a double redirect, but regardless the end page describes democratic economic planning in this sense, even if it also includes information about undemocratic economic planning. Bryce Springfield (talk) 07:11, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

God - The Single

• God - The Single → God (Rebecca St. James song)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not helpful, very vague, I suggest deletion. Veverve (talk) 04:14, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

• Keep - Google suggests this is an unambiguous target, and it's a plausible search term for someone using copy/paste from one of the various sources that describe it in exactly these terms. Fieari (talk) 06:53, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Category:Romanesque architecture in the United States

• Category:Romanesque architecture in the United States → Category:Romanesque Revival architecture in the United States  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Category should be deleted: Romanesque was a style of medieval Europe; the proper category for these buildings is Category:Romanesque Revival architecture in the United States, all now moved. ɱ (talk) 03:00, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

• Procedural close and send to CfD. Deleting a page that was a category for more than five years is out of the scope of RfD, and it should be discussed at the appropriate venue. CycloneYoris ^talk! 05:39, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Template:Cleanup-bare URLs/why

• Template:Cleanup-bare URLs/why → Wikipedia:Bare URLs  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unused template. Although it is actually a redirect Q𝟤𝟪 02:13, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

• Delete as old, useless claptrap.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  02:23, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Template:Cleanup bare URLs/why

• Template:Cleanup bare URLs/why → Wikipedia:Bare URLs  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This page does not have a link to it and should be removed Q𝟤𝟪 02:12, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

• Delete as old, useless claptrap.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  02:23, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Templates and Modules

Template:British and American English terms not widely used in Australian English

• Template:British and American English terms not widely used in Australian English (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is article content intended for use as a table in two articles, but since it uses the navbox template, it is not visible in mobile view. It should be converted into a table or list and placed in one of the articles, from which section transclusion can be used to include it in the other article if necessary. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:15, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

If it should go anywhere of those 2 articles then it is Australian English vocabulary. However, the content should be reformatted as either prose or an actual table and not that mess. Also, this seems a bit WP:OR but I haven't checked it too deeply. Gonnym (talk) 07:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Template:Iris Kyle

• Template:Iris Kyle (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This navbox is used in only one article, and it is more a summary of one person's achievements and associations than a set of articles that should be mutually linked to one another. It should be deleted, with all relevant and sourced content moved to the parent article. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:10, 30 May 2023 (UTC)