Wikipedia:WikiProject Science

For a directory of science-oriented WikiProjects, see: WikiProject Council: Directory – Science

 Wikiproject Science Topics list Target articles Guidelines Templates Members 

WikiProject Science

Stylized Lithium atom
Shortcuts	WP:SCIENCE, WP:WPSCI
Category	WikiProject Science
Portal	Science
Wikimedia Commons	Science
Project banner template	{{WikiProject Science}}
Userboxes	{{User WikiProject Science}} {{User WikiProject Science2}}
Helps organise child projects?	No
Has goals?	Yes
Assessment	Wikipedia:WikiProject Science/Assessment

Scope and goals

This WikiProject aims primarily to coordinate the efforts of Wikipedians interested in science in an effort to improve popular science-related articles. It is motivated by the belief that a good scientific article should be both understandable by the "general public" and interesting to the scientifically inclined. This is important because many popular articles are about science, so contributing to them brings us the satisfaction that it will be appreciated by many.

The goals of this WikiProject are:

1. To attract Wikipedians to this project and focus the effort for maximum efficiency
2. To serve as a nexus and discussion area to build consensus on how to write good scientific articles.

Plan of approach

The approach is to start with the most popular scientific articles, then focus on the more specific ones. The most popular scientific articles are the ones that are most referenced by other articles (as Google does).

Other science projects

Additional science projects are listed at this directory page: WikiProject Council: Directory – Science. See the current Science portal for examples of how science articles can be arranged topically and linked to and from related WikiProjects and Portals. Outline of the scientific method is also a useful article.

How you can help

"All of science is nothing more than the refinement of everyday thinking."

— Albert Einstein, in "Physics and Reality" (1936); later published in Out of My Later Years (1950)

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.

Improve Wikipedia's coverage of science-related topics:

1. Identify articles related to science and tag talk pages with the project's banner: {{WikiProject Science}}
2. Improve and discuss the proposed structures of articles
3. Improve science articles
4. Sign the guestbook or place {{User WikiProject Science}} on your user page.
5. Add this page to your watchlist to see what's occurring here

Improve the bird's eye view

The Outline of science and its branch outline articles are intended to summarize all of the sciences. These are in turn part of Wikipedia's outline system which is one of Wikipedia's main contents systems. Please look it and its branches over and fill-in missing topics. If Wikipedia has an article or article section about those topics, please add links to them.

While analyzing the outlines, please consider (and fix as needed):

1. What's missing?
2. Is the structure of the outline (sections and indents) representative of the subject?
3. Does the outline help convey the relationships between the topics presented in the best way possible?

The overall purpose of the outlines is to help readers comprehend science. The science outline provides a taxonomy of the subject, and also serves as a table of contents and navigation aid to browse Wikipedia's articles (and article sections) about the subject. It is also a useful tool for the WikiProject to analyze, plan and develop science-related material. Outlines are a hub from which to organize scientific topics.

The concept of "reverse outlines" is a very relevant example. Reverse outlines provide a structural model overview, which in addition to being a summary of the work, can reveal gaps in coverage and other weaknesses for revision purposes. Please help improve the Outline of science article, which is this project's bird's eye view.

Other

• Answer requests for comments

• Integrate relatively new scientific knowledge and findings (major studies reported on by RS) into relevant articles
  • You can also go through this list of items that were nearly/not included in the last Year in science article to find studies to integrate elsewhere (many of these contain notable info, you can filter them by field and many rows have a likely relevant article already wikilinked in the last column)
  • Complete requests of other editors on the talk pages of science-related articles (examples)
• Expand 2023 in science and/or other articles for science-related topics of the year (in the box on the right)
  • Create new articles for items of this article, mostly articles relating to new scientific fields/topics/findings (the page does not use redlinks anymore but you will quickly identify possible new articles when reading it; here you can find a version with over 60 redlinked examples)
  • Some of the lists' items have not yet been integrated into their wikilinked articles; if you add a study there it should also be relevant to at least one other article
  • Maybe this could be done as part of an organized effort
• Find studies published under a compatible open license (like CC BY 4.0) and upload the studies' images with descriptions from the study and add these images to articles if they are relevant and useful there
  • When a study with a useful image is published under an incompatible or unclear license (or the image is published not in a study but elsewhere), you could contact its authors (Twitter/Mail) and ask them to give you the permission to upload them under CC BY 4.0 (or whether they could upload the image/s under a compatible license)
  • You can also think about whether images would be useful as you read a science-related article and then search for such images:
    • if they already exist add them (if already on WMCommons) or upload them (if the license is ok) or ask their authors for permissions
    • if they don't, you could create (or request) them

Article alerts

Did you know

• 21 Mar 2023 – The Longevity Diet (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Bruxton (t · c); see discussion

Articles for deletion

• 29 Mar 2023 – Unbitrium (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by ComplexRational (t · c); see discussion (8 participants)
• 28 Mar 2023 – List of plant scientists (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Elmidae (t · c); see discussion (9 participants)
• 25 Mar 2023 – Asad Zaman (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Oblivy (t · c); see discussion (5 participants)
• 24 Mar 2023 – Rozalia Sultangareeva (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Onel5969 (t · c); see discussion (3 participants; relisted)
• 18 Mar 2023 – Jean-Émile Charon (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by JaggedHamster (t · c); see discussion (10 participants; relisted)
• 20 Mar 2023 – Dinesh Kumar (chemist) (talk · edit · hist) AfDed by Curb Safe Charmer (t · c) was closed as keep by Arbitrarily0 (t · c) on 28 Mar 2023; see discussion (7 participants)
• 18 Mar 2023 – Brookhaven Instruments (talk · edit · hist) AfDed by BangJan1999 (t · c) was closed as delete by Explicit (t · c) on 01 Apr 2023; see discussion (3 participants; relisted)

Proposed deletions

• 29 Mar 2023 – Brink (TV series) (talk · edit · hist) was PRODed by Donaldd23 (t · c): Appears to not be notable, as nothing was found in a BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2020
• 24 Mar 2023 – Globus Alliance (talk · edit · hist) PRODed by Pppery (t · c) was deleted

Categories for discussion

• 21 Feb 2023 – Category:Queer scientists (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by Bohemian Baltimore (t · c); see discussion

Good article nominees

• 03 Mar 2023 – University College London (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Robminchin (t · c); see discussion

Good article reassessments

• 15 Feb 2023 – Astronomy (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for GA reassessment by Onegreatjoke (t · c); see discussion

Requested moves

• 23 Mar 2023 – Schaffhausen Institute of Technology (talk · edit · hist) move request to Constructor group, formerly known as Schaffhausen Institute of Technology by NY Arici (t · c) was not moved; see discussion

Articles to be merged

• 10 Feb 2023 – Co-production (society) (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Co-production (public services) by Mountaincirque (t · c); see discussion
• 04 Dec 2022 – Stephen Hawking Medal for Science Communication (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Starmus Festival by Grorp (t · c); see discussion
• 03 Sep 2022 – Matrix-M (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to ISCOM by Liebeskind (t · c); see discussion
• 20 Jun 2022 – Fringe science (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Fringe theory by Piotrus (t · c); see discussion

Articles to be split

• 27 Apr 2022 – Radiogenomics (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by Charles Matthews (t · c); see discussion
• 26 Apr 2022 – Science and technology in the United States (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by Mrbeastmodeallday (t · c); see discussion

Articles for creation

• 01 Apr 2023 – Draft:Dr Paribartan Baral (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Paribartan3518 (t · c)
• 30 Mar 2023 – Draft:Lifecare AS (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by AWArdour (t · c)
• 29 Mar 2023 – Draft:Yusuff Adebisi Adebayo (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Charleskovic (t · c)
• 29 Mar 2023 – Draft:Controversy about the term minor attracted person (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by 22spears (t · c)
• 28 Mar 2023 – Draft:Eaton–Rosen phenomenon (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Blaze Wolf (t · c)
• 28 Mar 2023 – Draft:Emilio Ferrara (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by 47.144.146.102 (t · c)
• 27 Mar 2023 – Draft:International Particle Physics Outreach Group (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Ippog (t · c)
• 27 Mar 2023 – Draft:List of Books Written by ChatGPT (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Mtomg (t · c)
• 27 Mar 2023 – Draft:Shyue Ping Ong (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by 68.107.41.252 (t · c)
• 26 Mar 2023 – Draft:Okhil Kumar Medhi (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Daredevil 19888 (t · c)

(117 more...)

Statistics

Science articles by quality and importance
Quality	Importance
	Top	High	Mid	Low	NA	???	Total
FA	3	2		1			6
FL			2				2
GA	3	1	1	11			16
B	13	16	21	53		12	115
C	16	43	56	292		80	487
Start	2	54	99	784	1	346	1,286
Stub	2	15	25	526	1	130	699
List	5	18	23	83	1	36	166
Category					2,818		2,818
Disambig					18		18
File					7		7
Portal					168		168
Project					31		31
Redirect			1	4	111		116
Template					103		103
Other				2	463		465
Assessed	44	149	228	1,756	3,722	604	6,503
Unassessed				3		368	371
Total	44	149	228	1,759	3,722	972	6,874
WikiWork factors (?)		ω = 12,949			Ω = 4.96

Categories

Science

Scientists

Science-related lists

Works about science

Scientific terminology

Branches of science

Scientific disciplines

Science books

Scientific buildings

Scientific classification

Scientific comparisons

Science education

Scientific exploration

Fringe science

History of science

Scientific instruments

Measurement

Metascience

Scientific method

Natural history

Science occupations

Open science

Scientific organizations

Scientific phenomena

Science pioneers

Scientific problems

Quotations from science

Science experiments

Science in society

Scientific speculation

Technicians

Science and technology

Thanatology

Time in science

Women and science

Images by scientific discipline

Science stubs

Wikipedia categories named after science projects

Members

To add your name to the list of members, please visit the Guest book.

Parentage and related WikiProjects

WikiProject Science is parent of the WikiProjects below:

• WikiProject Academic Journals
• WikiProject Anthropology
• WikiProject Archaeology
• WikiProject Astronomy
• WikiProject Biology
• WikiProject Chemistry
• WikiProject Cognitive science
• WikiProject Computer science
• WikiProject Cosmology
• WikiProject Engineering
• WikiProject Forestry
• WikiProject Futures studies
• WikiProject Geology
• WikiProject Glass
• WikiProject History of Science
• WikiProject Linguistics
• WikiProject Mathematics
• WikiProject Medicine
• WikiProject Meteorology
• WikiProject Physics
• WikiProject Philosophy/Science
• WikiProject Pseudoscience
• WikiProject Psychology
• WikiProject Royal Society
• WikiProject Skepticism
• WikiProject Soil
• WikiProject Spaceflight
• WikiProject Statistics
• WikiProject Systems
• WikiProject Time
• WikiProject Weather
• WikiProject Women scientists

Related pages

Portal

•  Science portal

WikiProjects

• Environment WikiProjects
• Geographical WikiProjects
• Technology WikiProjects
• WikiProject Invention

Subpages

• List of all subpages of this page

Older project pages

• WikiProject Science – strategies: Includes project history

Scientific Peer Review

Peer review at this project is no longer active and scientific articles should be directed to the general Wikipedia peer review. Reviews of articles that were completed are archived here.

Comments

As noted at Talk:Environmental chemistry please do any work in consensus with other editors. Removing large sections leaving bare headings is not the right way to proceed.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   08:50, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

A refereed journal on Wikiversity

I think I posted this on an archived discussion and will look for a better place to post--Guy vandegrift (talk) 09:49, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

According to this survey, the prime disincentive against making scholarly contributions to Wikipedia is that it will not advance careers. Wikiversity:First Journal of Science will be a peer-reviewed journal that should alleviate this problem for recent college graduates who are not expected to have published in the established scholarly journals.

The word "First" in the title is intended to suggest that we need more journals like this. The Wikiversity:First Journal of Science was patterned after the Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, but will have a somewhat more informal flavor, consistent with this new journal's intent to focus on teaching at the undergraduate college level. Wikiversity:First Journal of Science will attribute with bylines that list usernames only, in contrast with the use of real names by the Wikiversity Journal of Medicine

Another unique feature of Wikiversity:First Journal of Science is that edited versions of Wikipedia articles are welcome, and are presented as Wikipedia articles on the Wikiversity journal via permalinks to the history of Wikipedia articles. This is currently accomplished in a rather awkward fashion, by moving the Wikipedia article into the editor's user space, and after proper attribution, deleting all that extraneous prose that Wikipedia articles tend to acquire. An example of this shown in one of the three "pseudo-articles" that were used to create a mockup issue. Of the three "pseudo-articles" in this mockup, I consider only one to be suitable for publication. It is Wikipedia's Introduction to quantum mechanics. Note how the logo was inserted into the "pseudo-accepted" version without permission of the article's current editors. In other words, all of Wikipedia's 5 million articles are candidates for publication in this journal, and in a manner of speaking, have already effectively submitted their manuscripts to Wikiversity:First Journal of Science for review--Guy vandegrift (talk) 05:24, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Tools

• reFill – Edits bare url references: adds title, dates, publisher, etc.