Wikipedia:WikiProject Psychology/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 Main Main Talk Article guide Article alerts Assessment Popular pages Recognized content Resources 
Index · Statistics · Log

This is the WikiProject Psychology article assessment page. Our assessments are based on the Version 1.0 Editorial Team, as part of their Work via WikiProjects initiative.

Instructions[edit]

Quality[edit]

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Psychology}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Psychology|class=???}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class psychology articles)  FA
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class psychology articles)  A
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class psychology articles)  GA
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class psychology articles) B
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class psychology articles) C
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class psychology articles) Start
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class psychology articles) Stub
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class psychology articles)  FL
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class psychology articles) List

For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:

Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class psychology articles) Category
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class psychology articles) Disambig
Draft (for drafts; adds pages to Category:Draft-Class psychology articles) Draft
File (for files and timed text; adds pages to Category:File-Class psychology articles) File
Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class psychology articles) Portal
Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class psychology articles) Project
Template (for templates and modules; adds pages to Category:Template-Class psychology articles) Template
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class psychology articles) NA
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed psychology articles) ???

Importance[edit]

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Psychology}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Psychology|importance=???}}

The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):

Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance psychology articles)  Top 
High (adds articles to Category:High-importance psychology articles)  High 
Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance psychology articles)  Mid 
Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance psychology articles)  Low 
NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance psychology articles)  NA 
??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance psychology articles)  ??? 

It is also possible to use |imp= for this purpose.

Grading scheme[edit]

Quality scale[edit]

Importance scale[edit]

The article's importance, regardless of its quality

Top Subject is a must-have for a print encyclopedia
High Subject contributes a depth of knowledge
Mid Subject fills in more minor details
Low Subject is peripheral knowledge, possibly trivial


"DRAFT" WikiProject Psychology importance scale: The article's importance, regardless of its quality, particularly in terms of psychology's history, principles, scope, and methods.

Rate articles on overall importance. Use the basic descriptions, guided by the general examples when available. Always give the highest rating suggested by general examples at different levels.

DRAFT WikiProject Psychology importance scale
Class Description General examples Biography examples
Top Subject is a must-have for Category:Psychology and is considered a core topic. The article is a likely target for encyclopedic research. Psychologists and other experts in psychology will generally be well-versed on the topic, and many non-psychologists will likely have some familiarity with it. Intelligence Sigmund Freud[a]
High Subject contributes a depth of knowledge to the field of psychology. Most experts in psychology will be familiar with the topic. The subject can be found in most academic studies of psychology, and a significant amount of published research exists for it. Schizophrenia
Mid Subject fills in more minor details but is still important to the field of psychology. Many psychologists are knowledgeable of the topic. Published research from a variety of sources exists for the subject. Big Five personality traits
Low Subject is peripheral knowledge to the field of psychology and possibly trivial but still notable. There may be limited research on the topic, or most professionals in psychology have not yet taken note of it. Liberation psychology
  1. ^ As of 3 Oct 2021, the only top-class biography

Hall of heroes[edit]

This is a space, created October 2021, to commemorate significant efforts in assessment.

  • Bibeyjj: added 6 October 2021, for getting quality assessments to 100% and maintaining it there. --Xurizuri (talk) 02:41, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

See also[edit]

Requesting an assessment or re-assessment[edit]

What you can accomplish here

This process is to find out whether your article is currently assessed at the correct quality level (Stub, Start, C, B) and correct importance (Low, Mid, High, Top). If you have significantly expanded an article and it is rated below B class, or if you feel the rating is otherwise incorrect, then please feel free to list it below.

What you can NOT accomplish here

  • If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, contact the volunteers at WT:PSYCH or list it at Peer review instead.
  • If you think the article is particularly well written, then you can nominate it as a possible Good article or even as a possible Featured article.

Add articles here! Newest requests on the BOTTOM, and remember to sign using ~~~~

List[edit]