Wikipedia:WikiProject London/Assessment
Statistics[edit]
| London-related articles by quality and importance | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality | Importance | ||||||
| Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | ??? | Total | |
 FA
|
3 | 15 | 53 | 140 | 211 | ||
| FL
|
2 | 4 | 26 | 32 | |||
 A
|
1 | 1 | |||||
 GA
|
5 | 33 | 102 | 457 | 597 | ||
| B | 19 | 71 | 202 | 842 | 2 | 1,136 | |
| C | 16 | 86 | 393 | 3,005 | 14 | 3,514 | |
| Start | 3 | 75 | 609 | 12,404 | 28 | 13,119 | |
| Stub | 92 | 8,864 | 1 | 12 | 8,969 | ||
| List | 4 | 21 | 97 | 579 | 701 | ||
| Category | 2 | 4,319 | 4,321 | ||||
| Disambig | 48 | 1 | 49 | ||||
| File | 504 | 504 | |||||
| Portal | 26 | 26 | |||||
| Project | 61 | 61 | |||||
| Redirect | 1 | 14 | 622 | 637 | |||
| Template | 391 | 391 | |||||
| Other | 1 | 71 | 72 | ||||
| Assessed | 50 | 304 | 1,553 | 26,334 | 6,043 | 57 | 34,341 |
| Unassessed | 1 | 2 | 171 | 174 | |||
| Total | 50 | 304 | 1,554 | 26,336 | 6,043 | 228 | 34,515 |
| WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 137,924 | Ω = 5.01 | |||||
Quality scale[edit]
- Category:FA-Class London-related articles
- Category:GA-Class London-related articles
- Category:B-Class London-related articles
- Category:Start-Class London-related articles
- Category:Stub-Class London-related articles
- Category:Unassessed London-related articles - unassessed - please start assessing
Grading scheme[edit]
| Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FA |
The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Marshalsea (as of March 2015) |
| FL |
The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available. | List of winners of the London Marathon (as of March 2015) |
| A |
The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Class Not Used |
| GA |
The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
A good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (but not equaling) the quality of a professional encyclopedia. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Harmondsworth Great Barn (as of March 2015) |
| B | The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | London Heathrow Airport (as of March 2015) |
| C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | 13 Kensington Palace Gardens (as of March 2015) |
| Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | 102.2 Smooth FM (as of March 2015) |
| Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | .london (as of March 2015) |
| List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of architectural sculpture in the City of Westminster (as of March 2015) |
Each London related article should have an assessment of quality and importance on its talk page using the {{WikiProject London}} template, such as {{Wikipedia:WikiProject London|class=B|importance=high}}.
Quality scale[edit]
The following quality classes are used to categorise articles on Wikiproject London:
- Stub class: No structure, only brief sentence or two - Use
class=Stub - Start class: Some structure, brief paragraphs - Use
class=Start - C class: improved structure and details separating article into topics but requiring, further development such as references, images, etc. - Use
class=C - B class: developed structure, at least one paragraph for most required headers, in-line sourcing, includes map and at least one image - Use
class=B - Good Article (GA) class: all required headers with complete coverage of subject and relevant images. Must have been nominated for and have passed a Good Article review - Use
class=GA - List: an article that takes the form of a list rather than prose. An introduction is still required and images may be included - Use
class=List - A class: NOT USED
- Featured Article (FA) class: complete, professional standard article, which must have been nominated for and have passed a Featured Article Review - Use
class=FA - Featured List(FL) class: complete list, which must have been nominated for and have passed a Featured List Review - Use
class=FL
Other administrative classes for use on non-article pages include:
- Portal class: for the Wikiproject London portal and its sub-pages - Use
class=Portal - Project class: for the project page and sub-pages - Use
class=Project - Category class: for categories - Use
class=category - Template class: for templates - Use
class=template - Redirect class: for redirect pages = Use
class=redirect - Book class: for books = Use
class=book
Importance scale[edit]
Log[edit]
 | This is a log of operations by a bot. The contents of this page are unlikely to need human editing. In particular, links should not be disambiguated as this is a historical record. |
June 9, 2023[edit]
Reassessed[edit]
- Crispin Odey (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Imre Lakatos (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed[edit]
- Draft:Augmentum Fintech (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Template:London Underground Baker Street Platform Layout (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Template:London Underground Barbican Platform Layout (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Template:London Underground King's Cross St Pancras Platform Layout (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Royal Victoria Square (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Draft:Tim Levene (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
June 8, 2023[edit]
Reassessed[edit]
- Mizzy (prankster) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed[edit]
- Glengall Road (football ground) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- The Raven Age (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
June 7, 2023[edit]
Renamed[edit]
- BBC London News renamed to BBC London (TV programme).
Reassessed[edit]
- Adeline de Monseignat (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Chantal Da Silva (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- MARRS (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Peggy Middleton (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed[edit]
- BBC London (TV programme) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Mahmudul Hasan Azhari (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Society of London (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Draft:The Mozartists (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
Removed[edit]
- Category:London society (talk) removed.
June 6, 2023[edit]
Renamed[edit]
- Draft:Chantal Da Silva renamed to Chantal Da Silva.
- List of dignitaries at the state funeral of Elizabeth II renamed to List of guests at the state funeral of Elizabeth II.
- Queens Park Harriers renamed to Queen's Park Harriers.
Reassessed[edit]
- Downings Roads Moorings (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed[edit]
- 2023 FA Community Shield (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- List of guests at the state funeral of Elizabeth II (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Peggy Middleton (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Queen's Park Harriers (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
June 5, 2023[edit]
Renamed[edit]
- Draft:Queens Park Harriers renamed to Queens Park Harriers.
Reassessed[edit]
- George de Benneville (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Guildhall School of Music and Drama (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed[edit]
- Gypsy Corner (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- William Cowlishaw Johnson (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
June 4, 2023[edit]
Reassessed[edit]
- Bobby Mair (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed[edit]
- Category:Cultural depictions of Henry VII of England (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Cultural depictions of Mary II of England (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Isambard Kingdom Brunel (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
June 3, 2023[edit]
Renamed[edit]
- List of London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine people renamed to List of London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine people.
- Draft:Richard Upton renamed to Draft:Richard Upton (businessman).
Assessed[edit]
- Category:Academics of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Alumni of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Chess in London (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Chess players from London (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- List of London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine people (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:People associated with the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Draft:Richard Upton (businessman) (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
Removed[edit]
- Category:Academics of the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (talk) removed.
- Category:Alumni of the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (talk) removed.
- Category:London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (talk) removed.
- Category:People associated with the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (talk) removed.