Wikipedia:WikiProject Jersey/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject Jersey
Flag of Jersey.svg
CategoriesJersey, Bailiwick of Jersey
Wikimedia CommonsCommons:Category:Jersey Jersey
United Kingdom
Project banner template{{WikiProject Jersey}}
Userbox{{User WikiProject Jersey}}
AssessmentWikipedia:WikiProject Jersey/Assessment
(edit · changes)

Welcome to the assessment department of WikiProject Jersey! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's articles related to Jersey. The article ratings are used within the project itself to aid in recognising excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WPJE}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Jersey articles by quality and Category:Jersey articles by importance.

Frequently asked questions[edit]

How can I get my article rated?
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
What if I don't agree with a rating?
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Who can assess articles?
Any member of the Jersey WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article.
Where can I find articles to assess?
Many articles in Category:Jersey still need to be assessed and any articles in Category:Unassessed Jersey articles and Category:Unknown-importance Jersey articles.

If you have any other questions that aren't listed here, feel free to ask them at the talk page.

How to assess articles[edit]

You can assess articles by placing the {{WPJE}} banner on its talk page (not the article page!) and using the two parameters, class (to assess the quality) and importance (to assess the priority).

Quality assessments[edit]

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WPJE}} project banner on its talk page:


The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Jersey articles)  FA
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Jersey articles)  A
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Jersey articles)  GA
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Jersey articles) B
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Jersey articles) C
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Jersey articles) Start
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Jersey articles) Stub
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Jersey articles)  FL
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Jersey articles) List

For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:

Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Jersey articles) Disambig
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Jersey articles) NA
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Jersey articles) ???

Quality scale[edit]

Priority assessment[edit]

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WPJE}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WPE| ... | importance=??? | ...}}

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

Priority scale[edit]

Label Criteria Examples
Top Articles with international recognition. Jersey
High Articles with national recognition. Grouville Hoard
Mid Articles with local recognition (e.g. Parishes). Grouville
Low Articles with local recognition. (e.g. Vingtaines) Vingtaine de Longueville

Requesting an assessment[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

Requested assessments

  • Contact 94. Expanded since initial assesment. Would also like guidance of addition by third parties of references to webcasts and internet streaming and whether this is acceptable or appropriate. GrouseyGrouse (talk) 23:35, 24 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]