Wikipedia:WikiProject Italy/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to the assessment department of the Italy WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Italy related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WP Italy}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Italy articles by quality and Category:Italy articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Frequently asked questions[edit]

How can I get my article rated?
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles?
Any member of the Italy WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article.
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
What if I don't agree with a rating?
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective?
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions[edit]

Quality assessments[edit]

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Italy}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Italy|class=???}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Italy articles)  FA
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Italy articles)  A
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Italy articles)  GA
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Italy articles) B
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Italy articles) C
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Italy articles) Start
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Italy articles) Stub
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Italy articles)  FL
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Italy articles) List

For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:

Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class Italy articles) Category
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Italy articles) Disambig
Draft (for drafts; adds pages to Category:Draft-Class Italy articles) Draft
File (for files and timed text; adds pages to Category:File-Class Italy articles) File
Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class Italy articles) Portal
Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class Italy articles) Project
Redirect (for redirect pages; adds pages to Category:Redirect-Class Italy articles) Redirect
Template (for templates and modules; adds pages to Category:Template-Class Italy articles) Template
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Italy articles) NA
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Italy articles) ???

After assessing an article's quality, any comments on the assessment can be added to the article's talk page.

The attention parameter is used to identify articles where immediate attention is needed. It is used in the form:

{{WikiProject UK|class=|importance=|attention=yes}}

Quality scale[edit]

Importance assessment[edit]

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WP Italy}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Italy| ... | importance=??? | ...}}
Top
High
Mid
Low
???

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

Importance scale[edit]

Label Criteria Examples
Top Core topics about Italy. Generally, these topics are sub-articles of the main Italy article, vital for the understanding of Italy or extremely notable to people outside of Italy. This category should stay limited to approximately 100 members. Biographies should be limited to the top one or two Italians in a particular field or persons of the greatest historical importance Economy of Italy,
High Topics that are very notable within Italy, and not unheard of outside of it, and can be reasonably expected to be included in any print encyclopedia Padua
Mid Topics that are reasonably notable on a national level within Italy without necessarily being famous or very notable internationally Simona Ventura
Low Topics of mostly local interest or those that are only included for complete coverage or as examples of a higher-level topic; peripheral or trivial topics

Requesting an assessment[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

  1. Samnites -- User:Ewf9h-bg (talk) 23. 43, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
  2. Randolfo Pacciardi -- Daydreamers (talk) 17:44, 4 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  3. Martyrs of Campo di Marte -- Festucalextalk 09:21, 1 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  4. L'Asino -- DonCalo (talk) 21:38, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Assessment log[edit]

Italy articles:
Index · Statistics · Log
The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

June 4, 2023[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Maria Luisa De Crescenzo (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
  • Prisma (TV series) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
  • Stefano LaTorre (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
  • Still Out of My League (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed[edit]

June 3, 2023[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

June 2, 2023[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Santa Croce, Forlì (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Tilake Abeysinghe (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

June 1, 2023[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 31, 2023[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]