Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Assessment

Welcome to the assessment department of the WikiProject on Football, which focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Association football related articles. The resulting article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work, and are also expected to play a role in the WP:1.0 programme.

The assessment is done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Football}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Football articles by quality and Category:Football articles by importance, which serve as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

FAQ

See also the general assessment FAQ.

1. What is the purpose of the article ratings?

The rating system allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. It is also utilized by the Wikipedia 1.0 program to prepare for static releases of Wikipedia content. Please note, however, that these ratings are primarily intended for the internal use of the project, and do not necessarily imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole.

2. How do I add an article to the WikiProject?

Just add {{WikiProject Football}} to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else.

3. Someone put a {{WikiProject Football}} template on an article, but it doesn't seem to be within the project's scope. What should I do?

Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the talk page of this department (or directly with the person who tagged the article).

4. Who can assess articles?

Any member of the football WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Editors who are not participants in this project are also welcome to assess articles, but should defer to consensus within the project in case of procedural disputes.

5. How do I rate an article?

Check the quality scale and select the level that best matches the state of the article; then, follow the instructions below to add the rating to the project banner on the article's talk page.

6. Can I request that someone else rate an article?

Of course; to do so, please list it in the section for assessment requests below.

7. Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?

Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.

8. Where can I get more comments about an article?

People at Wikipedia:Peer Review can conduct a more thorough examination of articles; please submit it for review there, or ask for comments on the main project discussion page.

9. What if I don't agree with a rating?

You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.

10. Aren't the ratings subjective?

Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

11. What if I have a question not listed here?

If your question concerns the article assessment process specifically, please refer to the discussion page for this department; for any other issues, you can go to the main project discussion page.

Instructions

Quality assessment

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Football}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Football|class=???}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class football articles)		FA
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class football articles)		A
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class football articles)		GA
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class football articles)		B
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class football articles)		C
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class football articles)		Start
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class football articles)		Stub
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class football articles)		FL
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class football articles)		List

For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:

Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class football articles)		Category
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class football articles)		Disambig
Draft (for drafts; adds pages to Category:Draft-Class football articles)		Draft
File (for files and timed text; adds pages to Category:File-Class football articles)		File
Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class football articles)		Portal
Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class football articles)		Project
Redirect (for redirect pages; adds pages to Category:Redirect-Class football articles)		Redirect
Template (for templates and modules; adds pages to Category:Template-Class football articles)		Template
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class football articles)		NA
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed football articles)		???

Importance assessment

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Football}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Football|importance=???}}

The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):

Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance football articles)		Top
High (adds articles to Category:High-importance football articles)		High
Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance football articles)		Mid
Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance football articles)		Low
NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance football articles)		NA
??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance football articles)		???

Quality scale

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Class	Criteria	Reader's experience	Editing suggestions	Example
FA	The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured article criteria: A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes. It is: well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard; comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context; well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate; neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias; stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of: a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections; appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style.	Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.	Belgium national football team (as of December 2016)
FL	The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured list criteria: Prose. It features professional standards of writing. Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria. Comprehensiveness. (a) It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items. (b) statements are sourced where they appear, and they provide inline citations if they contain any of the four kinds of material absolutely required to have citations. (c) In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for stand-alone lists; does not violate the content-forking guideline, does not largely duplicate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages. (a) Visual appeal. It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting, tables, and colour; and a minimal proportion of items are redlinked. (b) Media files. It has images and other media, if appropriate to the topic, that follow Wikipedia's usage policies, with succinct captions. Non-free images and other media satisfy the criteria for the inclusion of non-free content and are labeled accordingly. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.	Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available.	List of Ipswich Town F.C. statistics and records (as of February 2008)
A	The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria The article meets the A-Class criteria: Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history).	Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting.	Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help.	Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014)
GA	The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria A good article is: Well-written: the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Verifiable with no original research: it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline; all inline citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counterintuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines; it contains no original research; and it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. Broad in its coverage: it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (but not equaling) the quality of a professional encyclopedia.	Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing.	Abby Wambach (as of January 2014)
B	The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.	Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.	A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines.	Gareth Bale (as of April 2014)
C	The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.	Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study.	Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems.	Women's association football (as of November 2013)
Start	An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following: A useful picture or graphic Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article	Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more.	Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use.	Steven Kinniburgh (as of March 2012)
Stub	A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria.	Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant.	Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant.	Ji Xiang (as of January 2012)
List	Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area.	There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader.	Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized.	List of A.S. Roma players (as of February 2008)

Importance scale

Article importance grading scheme

Label	Base criteria	Football-related criteria	Examples
Top	Article is extremely important, even crucial, to its specific field. Reserved for articles that have achieved international notability within its subject or field.	Articles strictly related to the game: rules of the game, positions, confederations, etc.	Association football Offside (football) UEFA
High	Article is extremely notable, but has not achieved international notability, or is only notable within a particular continent.	Teams with international notability. Top-level leagues, awards and competitions. Top-rated world-class players and managers.	AFC Ajax Cristiano Ronaldo UEFA Champions League
Mid	Article is only notable within its particular field or subject and has achieved notability in a particular place or area.	Teams with nationwide notability. Players or managers that have participated at international level or in a top-level league. Mid-level leagues.	A.S. Roma Swiss Super League Gareth Barry
Low	Subject is not particularly notable or significant even within its field of study. It may only be included to cover a specific part of a notable article.	Any other player, manager or team. Football-related lists, season articles.	Leek Town F.C. Roberto Biffi List of Arsenal F.C. players

Statistics

Current status

The proportion of all articles with an assessed project banner is:

99% assessed (estimate: some more article talk pages may still need a banner)

   

The proportion of all articles with known importance is:

87.5% known importance (estimate: some more articles may still need importance to be assessed)

   

FIFA national football teams coloured by article class (25 December 2016)

Football articles by quality and importance
Quality	Importance
	Top	High	Mid	Low	NA	???	Total
FA	1	23	51	102			177
FL		2	25	245			272
A			1				1
GA		56	297	568			921
B	11	229	596	680			1,516
C	19	270	2,566	5,258	2	213	8,328
Start	7	370	13,596	63,329	1	4,657	81,960
Stub		39	33,859	128,575	125	45,359	207,957
List	3	15	296	7,776		2	8,092
Category					78,720		78,720
Disambig					201		201
File					16,931		16,931
Portal					455		455
Project					254		254
Redirect				394	3,657		4,051
Template					22,513		22,513
Other				1	649		650
Assessed	41	1,004	51,287	206,928	123,508	50,231	432,999
Unassessed				18		4,539	4,557
Total	41	1,004	51,287	206,946	123,508	54,770	437,556

Requests for assessment

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please use Wikipedia:Peer review instead.

2012

2012 answered assessments
Jan Suchopárek - Major improvement since its last rating in April 2012. Cloudz679 21:28, 10 November 2012 (UTC) Reassessed to C-class. Failed the #6 of the B-class criteria. FairyTailRocks 09:04, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

2013

2013 answered assessments

Millwall F.C.–West Ham United F.C. rivalry - I believe it was a couple of paragraphs when reviewed as 'low' a few years ago. It's been recently made a GA and is now extensive. Deserves a fresh rating. BillyBatty (talk) 05:09, 23 December 2013 (UTC) Already a GA article. FairyTailRocks 09:04, 16 May 2014 (UTC) History of Wigan Athletic F.C. - I made this today by taking the history section and copyediting it. Also made an overhaul of the section on the main WAFC article Tátótát (talk) 20:36, 13 December 2013 (UTC) Sticking to C-class. The lead should summarize some points of the article. Also some parts are unreferenced. A peer review may help. FairyTailRocks 09:04, 16 May 2014 (UTC) 2012–13 FC Barcelona season - Vastly improved since 25 April 2012. Rajnish (talk) 08:39, 16 April 2013 (UTC) Assessed to C-class. FairyTailRocks 09:59, 16 May 2014 (UTC) 2012–13 FC Bayern Munich season - Kingjeff (talk) 02:55, 17 May 2013 (UTC) Demoted to C-class, the structure and grammar of the article needs attention. FairyTailRocks 10:24, 16 May 2014 (UTC) List of Southport F.C. seasons - Not been reviewed since i first created it in 2010. Needs work doing to it, but i have a week off to crack on with it. thanks Narom (talk) 21:14, 18 May 2013 (UTC) Assessed to B-class. I assume that the offline sources are reliable and the "General" sources support the unsourced season. FairyTailRocks 10:24, 16 May 2014 (UTC) Ralph Milne - added much more info to Dundee Utd section where he was most successful + added references elsewhere ShugSty (talk) 00:14, 12 June 2013 (UTC) Full of references but assessed to C-class. His career statistics are unsourced, also his time with the two other clubs needs expansion. FairyTailRocks 10:24, 16 May 2014 (UTC) Peter Latchford - Article has been improved substantially over last 6 months ShugSty (talk) 14:20, 15 June 2013 (UTC) Sticking to start-class. Some bare URLs and some of it are tagged unreliable. FairyTailRocks 10:31, 16 May 2014 (UTC) Crystal Palace F.C., I've performed an extensive rewrite and would like to see it reviewed again, thanks. Hiding T 21:18, 28 June 2013 (UTC) Already a GA article. FairyTailRocks 10:31, 16 May 2014 (UTC) Lars Fuchs, recently changed this from stub to C, but was reverted. Would like an independent assessment. Thanks. Madcynic (talk) 17:40, 4 July 2013 (UTC) Stick to stub, very little information about him. FairyTailRocks 09:59, 16 May 2014 (UTC) Juan Aurich - Improved the lead section, expanded the history section, added a colors and badge section and added a stadium section. A new assessment of the expansion of this article is welcomed. --MicroX (talk) 05:38, 26 July 2013 (UTC) Assessed to C-class. FairyTailRocks 10:44, 16 May 2014 (UTC) 2013–14 Brentford F.C. season - Hasn't been rated yet itchybowwow (talk) 14:09, 12 August 2013 (UTC) Sticking to C-class. I suggest a table for the key events and merge some of it to the season review. The structure needs to be clear. List of Swansea City A.F.C. seasons - I overhauled this page back in June. Would appreciate some feedback. Red links are a WIP. Cheers. Roguesoul (talk) 23:53, 22 August 2013 (UTC) Reassessed to B-class. All seasons and the history section are referenced. FairyTailRocks 10:44, 16 May 2014 (UTC) 2013–14 ŠK Slovan Bratislava season - hasn't been rated yet. Stclaus (talk) 23:50, 30 October 2013 (UTC) Created talk page. Assessed to Start. FairyTailRocks 09:53, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

2014

2014 answered assessments

Maccabi Tel Aviv F.C. - After widely enriching the page, I would appreciate a new assessment, thnx.--Ronkinderz (talk) 09:51, 5 January 2014 (UTC) Demoted to Start-class. It has a few references with almost the whole article may contain original research. FairyTailRocks 09:20, 16 May 2014 (UTC) 2013–14 I-League - India's top-tier league and just concluded. Can someone please have a look and rate it? Coderzombie (talk) 20:50, 4 May 2014 (UTC) Graded as C-class. There are some parts which has no sources at all. Thanks. FairyTailRocks 08:43, 16 May 2014 (UTC) 2014 New England Revolution season - I've been hard at work updating the New England Revolution's current season page. I know it's not some super article, but I believe it's above Stub level at this point. Could someone take a look at give it a new rating, thanks? Nsideris24 (talk) 21:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC) Graded as C-class. The article has quite a bit of information with proper sources, but it needs to be updated with the rest of the season (i.e. Month by Month only goes til May). Christiangamer7 (talk) 16:26, 7 November 2014 (UTC) Jérémy Ménez - Article has been vastly improved over the years in terms of content and supporting references, and could potentially be B-class, maybe higher. LRD 13:40, 19 September 2014 (UTC) Graded as a B-Class. This is a well written article that follows the six categories for a B-Class article. Some parts may need to be cleaned up such as the phrase "the second goal was a beautifully worked backheel finish." sounding 5oo much of opinion and not like an encyclopedic entry. Some more sources may be needed to be added before this goes on to be a GA or A-Class article. Christiangamer7 (talk) 07:10, 8 November 2014 (UTC) Transfer (association football) - I have undertaken the task of majorly improving the article over the last year. It is currently rated as Start-class but I believe it should definitely be higher at this point. RealDealBillMcNeal (talk) 00:14, 2 October 2014 (UTC) Upgrading it to C-Class. Although the article has a large amount of references, I personally feel the introduction needs to be shortened and the information inside of it should be made into its own section of the body of the article. I could see this becoming a B-Class article with just a bit more work on it. Christiangamer7 (talk) 07:10, 8 November 2014 (UTC) Ramiro Corrales - Article has had a large amount of citations added as well as more information added. It is rated as a start class and should at least be a C-class article at this point in time. Christiangamer7 (talk) 06:07, 7 November 2014 (UTC) Agreed. The article has plenty of info plus a decent number of cites. I have changed it to C-class.Barryjjoyce (talk) 01:03, 16 December 2015 (UTC) Chris Wondolowski - Article was last assessed two years ago, and I think at this point it may be B-class instead of just C-class. If not, some pointers for what to improve would be good. Christiangamer7 (talk) 06:07, 7 November 2014 (UTC) Not done. This one seems on the bubble between C and B, and could be a solid B with some modest improvements. There is very little info regarding his early MLS career. Cites are ok but there is room for improvement — I've tagged a few places. And the amount of WP:Proseline throughout the text is a bit much. Barryjjoyce (talk) 02:48, 17 December 2015 (UTC) Bobby Convey - Seems to have enough info to be at least a C-class. Christiangamer7 (talk) 06:55, 8 November 2014 (UTC) Agreed. Done. Barryjjoyce (talk) 02:23, 15 December 2014 (UTC) Australia Cup - Improved the lead section, expanded the trophy section and added a history section. A new assessment of the expansion of this article is welcomed and would appreciate some feedback.--2nyte (talk) 00:39, 20 November 2014 (UTC) Not done. This article has certainly improved from the Stub that it was in 2014. The article looks to be at the upper end of the Start class, and could be bumped up to C-class following additional modest improvements. The overall length is a bit short, and nine references is ok but could use more. Barryjjoyce (talk) 03:08, 17 December 2015 (UTC) FC Tosno - The whole article has been entirely rewritten. Oldstone James (talk) 17:38, 17 December 2014 (UTC) Agreed. I changed it from Stub to Start. TDECU Stadium - This article has been significantly expanded since its last assessment. Brian Reading (talk) 05:25, 22 December 2014 (UTC) Agreed. I changed it from Start to C.

2015

2015 answered assessments

Kiveton Park F.C. - I have added a lot of detail to this article over the last few months and would appreciate any input! Kivo (talk) 19:10, 22 March 2015 (UTC) Done. reassessed as C-class. C679 21:31, 23 April 2016 (UTC) Philippines national football team - Article has been substantially expanded especially the history and competitive record sections. Requesting reassessment for possible upgrade to B-class from C-class. Improving the article to become listed FA class in the longer term.--Hariboneagle927 (talk) 06:26, 30 March 2015 (UTC) Agreed, it certainly meets B-class now. Not far from GA-class, but it'll take quite a lot of work to get to FA. – PeeJay 21:25, 18 June 2015 (UTC) Andrea Pirlo - I was hoping the article might be given a high importance rating in WikiProject Football (possibly also WikiProject Italy), thanks! Best, Messirulez (talk) 17:03, 8 May 2015 (UTC) Done. Reassessed for WikiProject Football. C679 03:41, 28 April 2016 (UTC) Al-Shaab Stadium - I rebuilt the whole article after it was very poor, unorganized and most of it wasn't referenced. I added licensed photos, videos and backed the information with loads of references. I also brought a a lot of information from official responsible people. I hope it gets an assessment for quality scale and the importance one. Hashima20 (talk) 21:51, 2 June 2015 (UTC) Done. Someone has since assessed at C-class, which seems about right. Barryjjoyce (talk) 02:16, 16 December 2015 (UTC) Lucas Pratto - Article improved in the past month with new headings, sub-headings, new picture, stats and references. Also better writing and style in general. Requesting reassessment regarding Quality and Importance (player has participated for five-years in top-level leagues and has achieved moderate notability by winning awards). Felipe Bini (talk) 02:35, 12 August 2015 (UTC) Done. reassessed as C-class by User:PeeJay2K3. C679 21:31, 23 April 2016 (UTC) André Hainault - doesn't look like Start-class to me, but I'd appreciate some hints. Madcynic (talk) 19:53, 12 August 2015 (UTC) Done. reassessed as C-class. Added tags for improvement. C679 03:36, 28 April 2016 (UTC) Jagiellonia Białystok - Article has been improved greatly. Any tips on how to improve would be appreciated. Matt918 (talk) 23:15, 24 August 2015 (UTC) Not done. Prose is not beyond Start-class. C679 21:31, 23 April 2016 (UTC) Alessandro Del Piero - I know it has been assessed in the past and deemed underserving of an upgrade as the changes suggested were not made by other users, but I have cleaned up this article and am now looking to have this upgraded to GA class; I have actually fixed all the changes suggested - I have taken away most of the POV and flowery language, and I have expanded the article, also adding many more sources. Thanks! Messirulez (talk) 15:29, 25 August 2015 (UTC) Not done. Article already listed as B-class. If you would like the article checked for a higher assessment, take it to WP:GA. C679 03:41, 28 April 2016 (UTC) 2015–16 FA Cup Qualifying Rounds - Having worked extensively on this page and related others I would be interested to know the standard it has reached and suggestions for improvement.M00036 (talk) 18:14, 13 September 2015 (UTC) Not done. Prose is not beyond Start-class. Suggestions for improvement exist at the failed GA review. C679 03:36, 28 April 2016 (UTC) Orlando City SC - Assessed as start-class, but I believe it warrants a C after some moderate citation-adding. Feel free to point me in the right direction if it isn't C-class yet. Somanytictoc (talk) 15:07, 14 October 2015 (UTC) Done. Article has clearly grown and improved over time. Barryjjoyce (talk) 02:13, 16 December 2015 (UTC) Stephane Sparagna - The article has been expanded to include up to date statistics as well as a description of his club career to date and his international experience. I am requesting that the article be reassessed and perhaps classed as a Start or C-class. Liam (talk 23:40, 12 December (GMT) Done. I changed it from Stub to Start. Barryjjoyce (talk) 02:21, 16 December 2015 (UTC) Freddie Woodman - I believe this article is start-class. It's in no danger of deletion, provides reliable sources, and gives the most important info. Thanks for your time, whoever reassess it. --Bobtinin (talk) 16:27, 13 December 2015 (UTC) Done. I changed it from Stub to Start. Barryjjoyce (talk) 02:21, 16 December 2015 (UTC) Dmitri Alenichev Upgrade importance to at least mid-importance: 6 years in Italy and Portugal, Champions League and UEFA Cup winner, and finnally played in FFA World Cup 2002.--Prandr (talk) 03:30, 28 December 2015 (UTC) Done.. Mid-importance. C679 21:31, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

2016

2016 answered assessments

Belgium women's national football team - This article is still marked as "Stub"-class, but it has undoubtedly improved way beyond that! It has probably been C-class quality for a while already, and after many recent edits, I would be so bold as to say it may already be B-class. –Sygmoral (talk) 00:32, 6 March 2016 (UTC)  Done C-class as there is still a lot of unsourced sentences, definitely not a stub though. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 14:41, 15 December 2016 (UTC) Kermit Erasmus - After a substantial number of edits and cleaning I believe this article is no longer a stub and could be considered a C-class. Liam (talk) 10:25, 16 March 2016 (UTC) Done. reassessed as C-class. Lead should be lengthened. C679 06:28, 24 April 2016 (UTC) Harry Beadles - Expanded this article quite a bit recently. Wondering if it's worthy of moving up to B-class. Any pointers on improving it would be very welcome as well. Kosack (talk) 09:07, 24 April 2016 (UTC)  Already done and awarded GA status. C679 20:01, 10 August 2017 (UTC) Ludwig Augustinsson - Have created and worked on this page for a year now, I was wondering if there were chances of receiving a higher grade than C, since it was set when the article were with way less content. // Psemmler (talk) 12:48, 25 April 2016 (UTC)  Already done and awarded GA status. C679 20:01, 10 August 2017 (UTC) Mahmoud Dahoud - I would like to request this page be graded as C-class in the quality and Mid in the importance scale. Liam (talk) 23:45, 28 April 2016 (UTC) Done. reassessed as C-class, could arguably B-class. Re importance, per WP:FOOTY's importance scale, players generally need to play in a top league for 5 years to get "Mid" importance, so 2 years to go. Macosal (talk) 05:04, 23 April 2017 (UTC) Clube Atlético Mineiro in international club football - I believe the article complies with B-class requirements, regarding supporting material, style and references. Felipe Bini (talk) 02:32, 15 May 2016 (UTC)  Done Promoted to GA status. Felipebini (talk) 13:58, 15 December 2016 (UTC)  Already done Per above. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 14:36, 15 December 2016 (UTC) Erin McLeod - I have made substantial edits and expanded this article, and would like to request that is be reassessed for a possible upgrade. Thanks. - Soccerfan1996 (talk) 02:50, 15 June 2016 (UTC)  Already done Now that it's been promoted to GA status. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 14:27, 25 July 2016 (UTC) Stéphane Sparagna - substantial editing has been effected to the article, aligning style and reference in such a manner to comply with the requirements of a B-class rating. Liam E. Bekker (talk) 14:00, 25 July 2016 (UTC) Done. - Not by myself but page has been awarded GA status Liam E. Bekker (talk) 13:38, 18 August 2016 (UTC) Nahikari García - have made numerous edits adding information to body and sourcing references. I feel the page is worthy of C-class rating. Liam E. Bekker (talk) 08:44, 8 August 2016 (UTC)  Already done and awarded GA status. C679 20:01, 10 August 2017 (UTC) FK Tikveš - Hi all, I was wondering if the page can be considered for a possible upgrade to B-class. Kind Regards F00700I (talk) 16:18, 14 August 2016 (UTC)  Done Upgraded to B class. C679 20:01, 10 August 2017 (UTC) Francesco Totti - Hello. This article failed the GA review, but I was wondering if it were still good enough to be upgraded from C-class to B-class, as a few editors and I have cleaned up the prose and I have also added many more citations. I was also wondering if it should be upgraded from Mid to High-importance on the WikiProject Football's Importance scale. Thank you! Best regards, Messirulez (talk) 03:30, 23 August 2016 (UTC) Done. Article definitely warrants B-class rating while awaiting GA reviews. Has also been upgraded to high importance Liam E. Bekker (talk) 06:10, 21 November 2016 (UTC) Paul Pogba - Hello. I was wondering if this article should be upgraded from Mid to High-importance on the WikiProject Football's Importance scale. Thank you! Best regards, Messirulez (talk) 13:43, 4 November 2016 (UTC)  Already done Now that it's been promoted to GA status. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 19:39, 23 November 2016 (UTC) Sebastian Giovinco - While the article awaits a GA review, I was wondering if this article warranted an upgrade from C-class to B-class, as a few editors and I have cleaned up the prose and added many more citations. I'm not sure if it warrants an upgrade from Mid to High-importance on the WikiProject Football's Importance scale, but I was also wondering if it should be considered for one. Thank you! Best, Messirulez (talk) 14:27, 4 November 2016 (UTC)  Already done Now that it's been promoted to GA status. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 19:39, 23 November 2016 (UTC) 1954 FIFA World Cup Final I have greatly expanded the article, adding inter alia historical context, background on the Hungarian and German 1954 football teams, material on team preparations and tactics, controversies, relevant developments after the match, as well as quotes and many citations. The article was rated "start" level quality before, I would be grateful for a review. Henry Kaspar (talk) 21:46, 14 December 2016 (UTC)  Done Bumped to C class as there are still some unsourced areas, but definitely not start class anymore. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 14:39, 15 December 2016 (UTC) Thank you - you are fast :-) As for the unsourced areas, I would be grateful for a little guidance. The only areas were this applied were, in my perception, the "path to the final, Hungary/West Germany" - which mostly lists opponents and results prior to the final, as documented on the main FIFA 1954 World Cup site - and "match - summary", which briefly retells what everyone can see on youtube. Still, I added a reference to the FIFA's 1954 World Cup site, and another to a youtube clip with the full TV coverage. Further sourced the claim that Germany's second goal would not have counted if the referee had called a foul. There a couple of instances where the language may still be a tad loose and that I would have drafted differently, but I did not want to edit to heavily the work of previous authors out of respect for their efforts. Henry Kaspar (talk) 15:49, 15 December 2016 (UTC) No problem. In order to achieve a higher rating, the most important things are citations and prose of wording. For a WP:GA class article, almost every sentence should have a source. The prose is also a big factor as it must be neutral and unbiased in its tone. I haven't read the article in detail, but if you feel the wording is too loose or too biased in areas, feel free to edit it; Wikipedia is a collective encyclopedia, no one owns anything. And if anyone objects, hash it out on the talk page. Also the lead could be more comprehensive of the whole article. That's what you would need for a GA nomination to probably pass. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 16:04, 15 December 2016 (UTC) OK, thanks. I've taken this to heart, weeded out any remaining traces of loose language, and added more than another dozen or so references - such that every sentence that could possibly be challenged is now sourced. I also added a little to the lead, but would need to think what to sensibly include there. Cheers, HK Henry Kaspar (talk) 22:23, 15 December 2016 (UTC) Jeff Hendrick - Currently unassessed for some reason. I've done quite a bit of work on this article over the past 5 or 6 months, tidying up the prose, adding citations etc. The big thing it's missing is a picture but that can wait. I think it deserves a B-class Low-Importance rating as I'm quite happy with the current state of the article but happy to go with whatever is decided. Many thanks. Mórtas is Dóchas (talk) 15:22, 20 December 2016 (UTC)  Done Well sourced article. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 15:40, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

2017

2017 answered assessments

Ghana Football Association - I cleaned the article up a few days ago, and am wondering if it is worthy of a higher ranking. CoolieCoolster (talk) 01:06, 7 January 2017 (UTC)  Done @CoolieCoolster: given the (probable) small size of source info, I suspect this is substantial coverage. Desperately needs some inline references though. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:40, 21 April 2017 (UTC) Jagiellonia Białystok I know this article has been reviewed before but I have made extensive additions to the article and added many sources. Any feedback would be helpful. Thanks! Matt918 (talk) 2:09, 16 March 2017 (UTC)  Done @Matt918: looking better, now C class. It needs quit a few inline refs and will be then B class. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:44, 21 April 2017 (UTC) Jordan Cook - This article has been expanded considerably over the past eight months and should be reassessed as it is definitely no longer Start-Class. Thank you. LTFC 95 (talk) 10:33, 16 April 2017 (UTC)  Done @LTFC 95: agree - now C class - write a nice lead summarising the article and can be a B class I think. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:45, 21 April 2017 (UTC) List of Dundalk F.C. seasons - Created the article and would like to see where it stands so that I can improve it. LampGenie01 (talk) 05:28, 21 July 2017 (UTC)  Done @LampGenie01: It is already assessed, correctly, as list-class. If you want detailed comments, may I suggest Wikipedia:Peer review. Thanks, C679 19:54, 10 August 2017 (UTC) Indiana Hoosiers men's soccer - I don't believe this has ever been assessed. Wicka wicka (talk) 19:30, 2 September 2017 (UTC)  Done It's seems like it has been already has been done and its a correctly rated as a start and maybe it could be a C standard there. Animation is developing 00:32, 5 August 2018 (UTC) Sardar Azmoun – "Stub" seems a bit off. Robby.is.on (talk) 19:27, 18 October 2017 (UTC)  Done @Robby.is.on: Assessed as C-class. The lead could do with expanding and some more inline citations are required, particularly in the Rostov sections, to move up to B-class. Kosack (talk) 22:43, 21 October 2017 (UTC) Thank you. :-) Robby.is.on (talk) 16:10, 22 October 2017 (UTC) Manchester City F.C. - Importance should be high not mid. 78.144.82.158 (talk) 05:41, 20 October 2017 (UTC)  Done It's seems like it has been already has been done. Animation is developing 00:32, 5 August 2018 (UTC) Karl Grob - unassessed.--Ortizesp (talk) 21:26, 21 October 2017 (UTC)  Done It's seems like it has been already has been done and its a correctly rated as a stub. Animation is developing 00:32, 5 August 2018 (UTC) Ercüment Şahin - unassessed.--Ortizesp (talk) 21:26, 21 October 2017 (UTC)  Done It's seems like it has been already has been done and its a correctly rated as a stub. Animation is developing 00:32, 5 August 2018 (UTC) Nika Kacharava - unassessed, some works been done on the article to make it complete.--Ortizesp (talk) 21:26, 21 October 2017 (UTC)  Done It's seems like it has been already has been done and its a correctly rated as a start. Animation is developing 00:32, 5 August 2018 (UTC) Carlos Bernegger -unassessed.--Ortizesp (talk) 21:26, 21 October 2017 (UTC)  Done It is currently correctly assessed as a start. SportingFlyer talk 05:28, 30 October 2018 (UTC) Christian Maghoma - unassessed.--Ortizesp (talk) 21:26, 21 October 2017 (UTC)  Done It's seems like it has been already has been done and its a correctly rated as a start. Animation is developing 00:32, 5 August 2018 (UTC) Christian Luyindama - unassessed.--Ortizesp (talk) 21:26, 21 October 2017 (UTC)  Done It's seems like it has been already has been done and its a correctly rated as a start. Animation is developing 00:32, 5 August 2018 (UTC) Ignác Molnár -unassessed, historical football figure.--Ortizesp (talk) 21:26, 21 October 2017 (UTC)  Done It's seems like it has been already has been done and its a correctly rated as a start. Not Homura (talk) 05:06, 25 March 2019 (UTC) Jordi Condom - unassessed.--Ortizesp (talk) 21:26, 21 October 2017 (UTC)  Done It's seems like it has been already has been done and its a correctly rated as a start. Not Homura (talk) 05:06, 25 March 2019 (UTC) Yusuf Yazıcı - unassessed, some work done on article..--Ortizesp (talk) 21:26, 21 October 2017 (UTC)  Done It's seems like it has been already has been done and its a correctly rated as a start. Not Homura (talk) 05:06, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

2018

2018 answered assessments

Kim Min-jae (footballer) - unassessed. Fbgpwns5277 (talk) 16:03, 14 January 2018 (UTC)  Done - It has been done already. HawkAussie (talk) 03:47, 25 June 2019 (UTC) Whitehawk F.C. - after re-writing I'd be interested in a re-assessment to improve it further hrse12 10:50, 22 January 2018 (UTC)  Done - buffed to B class. Notes on talk page. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:50, 4 March 2018 (UTC) 1887 FA Cup Final - I added a little bit of information. I'm not sure if it will be any better than 'start' class, but I'd like to know how I could improve it. Birdsgeek 1:20, 13 February 2018 (UTC)  Done - Buffed to Start class by only 140 bytes. HawkAussie (talk) 03:47, 25 June 2019 (UTC) List of Turkish football champions - I vastly enhanced and improved the article. It covers an aspect of Turkish football which is not covered in any other article. So I would like a reassessment. Regards, Akocsg (talk) 21:46, 2 March 2018 (UTC) Turkish National Division - needs to be re-assessed. Akocsg (talk) 22:32, 3 March 2018 (UTC) Güneş S.K. - needs to be re-assessed. Akocsg (talk) 14:13, 5 May 2018 (UTC) Galatasaray S.K. 0–7 Güneş S.K. - unassessed. Akocsg (talk) 14:13, 5 May 2018 (UTC)  Done - It has been done already. CSV Apeldoorn After expanding the page I would like a re-assessment. I deleted the stub category. Apologies if that was wrong. Also pointers as to how to further improve are more than welcome. --Dutchy45 (talk) 06:42, 4 October 2018 (UTC) Fiji national football team - Re-Assessment please because I don't think its a Start class now. Not Homura (talk) 04:55, 12 October 2018 (UTC)  Done - buffed to C class. Nehme1499 (talk) 23:30, 13 January 2019 (UTC) Sheppey United F.C. - after updating this page and adding a lot of content I was hoping this page could be re assessed please. User:Sheppey Red 06:55, 24 October 2018 (UTC) Enugu Rangers - I've significantly updated the history and references for this club and am interested to see where it currently stands and what further improvement is needed (comments welcome on its/my talk page too). SportingFlyer talk 05:26, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

2019

2019 answered assessments

Marcus Rashford - unassessed, the page has gone under many edits from many editors (including myself) since its creation so I believe its time it was assessed. F4JPhantomII (talk) 17:12, 15 February 2019 (UTC) Hekari United - Assessed as stub class but I've done a huge overhaul and is way more than that at this stage. Thanks. MrMarkBGregory (talk) 17:56, 28 April 2019 (UTC)  Done Bumped to C-class Matt294069 (talk) 23:15, 5 May 2019 (UTC) Dundalk F.C., the page has been completely overhauled and brought up to date with citations from Irish Newspaper Archives added to all historical information. Hoping to ultimately achieve FA if possible - Cheers! Daniel Sexton, 6 May 2019 (UTC)  Done Has been done already so well done on the GA HawkAussie (talk) 03:46, 25 June 2019 (UTC) Oriel Park, the page has been overhauled and brought up to date with citations from Irish Newspaper Archives added to all historical information. Hoping to promote from start - Cheers! Daniel Sexton, 10 May 2019 (UTC) 2019 FFA Cup preliminary rounds, competition nearly completed, article tables not much more to add within a month. Beyond Stub Class? 2018 FFA Cup preliminary rounds, competition completed, hasnt been assessed since the default rating after article creation. 2017 FFA Cup preliminary rounds, competition completed, This article has not yet received a rating. 2016 FFA Cup preliminary rounds, competition completed, Beyond Start Class? 2015 FFA Cup preliminary rounds, competition completed, Beyond Start Class? 2014 FFA Cup preliminary rounds, competition completed, hasnt been assessed since the default rating after article creation. for all of these 6 I have been a major editor, so feel that i'm too close to make any change to assessment class. Cheers. Matilda Maniac (talk) 15:17, 28 May 2019 (UTC) Ahmed Aloulou, has not received an importance rating yet. 16 October 2019  Done - Rated. Kosack (talk) 05:56, 17 October 2019 (UTC) Wahbi Khazri, should have it's quality rating should be changed as article has significantly improved. talk 12:20, 17 October 2019 (UTC) Robbie Deas,talk 15:52, 17 October 2019 (UTC) Blair Malcolm, LC1829 (talk) 20:10, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

2020

2020 answered assessments

Kevin Cossette, found this page as a stub with one source. Recently fixed it up, adding much more thorough detail and multiple references and citiations. RedPatchBoy (talk) 14:19, 29 August 2020 (UTC)  Done rated start class. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 14:24, 29 August 2020 (UTC) New York Generals, found this page as a stub with no sources. Recently performed a large edit on it, added several references and in-line citations. Think it may qualify for more than stub-class at this point. Thanks! JJonahJackalope (talk) 06:33, 8 February 2020 (UTC)  Done start class REDMAN 2019 (talk) 14:33, 8 April 2020 (UTC) Atlanta Chiefs, similar to above, performed a large overhaul on this page some time ago, think it may qualify for more than start-class. JJonahJackalope (talk) 06:39, 8 February 2020 (UTC)  Done REDMAN 2019 (talk) 14:37, 8 April 2020 (UTC) PAOK FC, performed a large edit on this page, added a lot of references, tables and tags. I'd be interested in a re-assessment and how to further improve it. Thanks! Abudabanas (talk) 18:12, 6 March 2020 (UTC)  Done raised to B class and upped importance level to mid REDMAN 2019 (talk) 14:30, 8 April 2020 (UTC) Sportbrüder Leipzig, changed from a stub into a full-blown article. Lots of citations added and over 7,000 characters added. I'm struggling to find more info. on the team at all, so just curious whether you think it appropriate to rate this as a B-class article or not. Thanks in advance! Allenthalben (talk) 02:43, 9 April 2020 (UTC) I think this would most probably be a C-class article.Because as you said there is not much info to be found on this article which I don't think would be substantial enough however I would be interested to here others take on this. Until then I have changed its rating to a C-class REDMAN 2019 (talk) 14:34, 9 April 2020 (UTC) Thanks for the review. I've managed to find a bit more information by crawling through old newspapers, but I believe I've found all that I can now. I have taken a look at some B-class articles and they do seem to be substantially long, so I think I would agree with C for this. Allenthalben (talk) 04:15, 10 April 2020 (UTC) Ezgjan Alioski, yet to be reviewed despite playing at a high level - I think it is start class but I'd probably like somebody else's take on it SFletcher06 (talk) 14:04, 28 April 2020 (UTC)  Done I would agree with start class for this one. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 16:09, 28 April 2020 (UTC) Chris Katjiukua - I significantly expanded this article as part of The 1000 Destubbing Challenge and reassessed as a Start class, though I feel it is probably a C class. I never like to assess articles I've added significant amounts to so I would appreciate it somebody else have a look at it. SFletcher06 (talk) 16:57, 6 June 2020 (UTC)  Done a bit borderline but I think this would qualify as a C-class. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 10:25, 7 June 2020 (UTC) Penn State Nittany Lions men's soccer Completed a very large edit to this page, cleaned up and stylized as well as added tons of history. Would love to see where it stands. Thanks y'all! NoahRiffe (talk) 20:23, 18 June 2020 (UTC)  Done nice work! I have upgraded it to start class. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 11:37, 20 June 2020 (UTC) 2019 Allsvenskan Looks like it was assessed only at the beginning of the season, so it would be interesting to see how it fares now. Would be nice if one could also give a small rationale for the decided classification. --Mango från yttre rymden (talk) 13:55, 26 June 2020 (UTC)  Not done Only a borderline Start class. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 15:36, 8 July 2020 (UTC) Detroit City FC - This has not been re-assessed since 2014. The club has gone professional since then and the article has been almost completely rewritten and sourced. Pirmas697 (talk) 14:35, 7 July 2020 (UTC)  Done It has been rerated as C-class. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 15:36, 8 July 2020 (UTC) 2020 Beijing Sinobo Guoan F.C. season - Have been continuously editing the article as the season progresses and the article is now filled with more details than when it was originally assessed. Would love to get a quick assessment and see how it matches up to the standards. Thank you! It is currently rated "C-class" and I would agree with that after looking over the article. Cheers! REDMAN 2019 (talk) 11:36, 27 September 2020 (UTC) Senegalese Football Federation - This article has almost entirely been rewritten and sourced over the last 6 months, with its scope, details, media and references dramatically expanded, compared to the time of its previous rating. I would love to have the article graded to see how it fairs. Thanks! Fzzey08 (talk) 05:29, 10 December 2020 (UTC)  Done C-class. Nice work! REDMAN 2019 (talk) 15:52, 10 December 2020 (UTC) Gustavo Hamer I have mostly rewritten this article since it was classed as a stub. It now has decent detail on all of his career. I think it needs updating from 'stub' class. Thanks. Skybluecm (talk) 23:12, 10 December 2020 (UTC)  Done upped to Start class. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 19:07, 23 December 2020 (UTC) FC Santa Claus, I've updated this article quite a bit, from an article with 2 references to 30+, since every year around this time it naturally attracts significant attention, including from news sites. Not a stub class anymore. RedPatchBoy (talk) 18:53, 23 December 2020 (UTC)  Done just in C-class zone. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 19:07, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

2021

2021 answered assessments

2020 Penn State Nittany Lions men's soccer team: hasn't been assessed since the default rating after article creation.  Done 1926 Penn State Nittany Lions men's soccer team: hasn't been assessed since the default rating after article creation.  no change 1927 Penn State Nittany Lions men's soccer team: hasn't been assessed since the default rating after article creation.  Done 1928 Penn State Nittany Lions men's soccer team: hasn't been assessed since the default rating after article creation.  Done 1930 Penn State Nittany Lions men's soccer team: hasn't been assessed since the default rating after article creation.  no change 1929 Penn State Nittany Lions men's soccer team: hasn't been assessed since the default rating after article creation.  no change 1931 Penn State Nittany Lions men's soccer team: hasn't been assessed since the default rating after article creation.  no change 1932 Penn State Nittany Lions men's soccer team: hasn't been assessed since the default rating after article creation.  no change 1933 Penn State Nittany Lions men's soccer team: hasn't been assessed since the default rating after article creation.  Done Park Avenue Army: hasn't been assessed since the default rating after article creation.  Done 2020 Penn State Nittany Lions women's soccer team: hasn't been assessed since the default rating after article creation.  Done -NoahRiffe (talk) 15:09, 29 April 2021 (UTC) Have rated first few, will do rest soon. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 15:04, 4 May 2021 (UTC) Alexia Putellas, Caroline Graham Hansen, Jennifer Hermoso, Lieke Martens, and FC Barcelona Femení are all articles I have expanded, and most have not been assessed since they were created. I believe they all could be considered C-class or higher.  Done -Kelsiesmith7 (talk) 22:07, 31 October 2021 (UTC) Caroline Graham Hansen had been graded as C before I took a look, and I rated the rest as C as well. I feel the first article is the closest to B-class but they all need a bit of polish to get to that next class level. Christiangamer7 (talk) 21:10, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

2022

• PAS Giannina F.C. This article has been extensively edited in the previous weeks, and important content has been added. PAS Giannina is a top club playing on the Greek Super League 1. This club is regarded as one of the best in Greece and has very rich, "different" and interesting history, since its foundation, in 1966. PAS Giannina has participated on European games against notable teams, and has a very wide and very strong fanbase across Europe, Oceania, South America and Africa. It also has one of the best fanbases in Greece and a very atmospheric home stadium. With many world class and well known footballers having played for PAS Giannina, including Euro 2004 champion Giourkas Seitaridis, greek international Konstantinos Mavropanos, Zenit's legend Yuri Lodygin and many more. Last but not least, Ajax Amsterdam veterans recently visited Ioannina city, in order to participate on an exhibition match against the PAS Giannina veterans, a match also broadcasted by Ajax TV. After these edits, the clubs page has been renewed with tons of information, photos, categories, charts and graphics, similar to those of World class and famous clubs with great attention to detail. For these reasons, considering also the club's impact on the domestic league, on Europe, and the whole world, I believe that the importance of the page, should change from "Mid", to "High", according to the importance scale, and from class "Start", to at least class "GA", if not to class "A", according to the Quality scale, since we are talking about a complete article about a top club.

Thank you, 
Ach.de.graf

• Los Angeles Aztecs I just did a major rewrite on this article. Last assessment was 15 December 2013‎. --dashiellx (talk) 20:39, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

 Done Assessed as C-class, a good foundation to be expanded on and refined. Christiangamer7 (talk) 21:27, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

• Manchester City F.C. 3–2 Queens Park Rangers F.C. - this article was only reviewed on 5th May, but a week or so later I added a significant chunk of text (including 36 unique web citations) to close off the main gap in what needed to be added to the article. I will also go one further and add that the gap I had left was in the aftermath impact for City, which is pretty much the main purpose of the article so I'd like to think that my addition carries some weight, at least in regards to getting this article reclassified. Honestly I've never paid much attention to article assessments before so I don't have a clear image of what it should be, but having perused the classifications I'd like to think it's at least worthy of a B-class now, if not perhaps just pushing an GA rating? Of course, if anyone can suggest extra content to add I'd be more than happy to do it, but right now - aside from wording/style/formatting changes - I literally cannot think of what I can add to this article to make it any better. Falastur2 ^Talk 19:41, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

@Falastur2:,  Done After reviewing I think this would pass B-class criteria and have upped it as such. Although if you plan on getting it to GA I would advise dealing with any tags. Good luck! REDMAN 2019 (talk) 08:25, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

@REDMAN 2019: I've cleaned up those Better Citation Needed warnings. What's the next step? Also, sorry to trouble you but any chance of a review of my other nomination, below? Much appreciated! Falastur2 ^Talk 16:44, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Falastur2, if you want to bring the article to GA status then the next step would be to nominate it at WP:GAN, instructions can be found at WP:GAI. At first glance the article looks like it would pass but do have some concerns about a couple of the sources, specifically ones sourced by sbnation.com and imdb.com as they are considered to be generally unreliable. That would very likely be raised in a GA review but apart from that I would say go for it and good luck! REDMAN 2019 (talk) 12:39, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

• Early grounds of Manchester City F.C. - I haven't actually worked on this article in some time, but I believe it's a fairly comprehensive coverage of the material. It's definitely not GA material, but is it worth a B class? I'd like to think so. Falastur2 ^Talk 08:54, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

 Done, This was a hard one, I having compared it against other similar B-class articles, I think this would just pass and have upped it as such. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 12:54, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Add new requests above this line

• 2022–23 Bengaluru FC season oof that's a lot of edit, hope this gets assessed soon before the season kicks off. Footy2000 (talk) 16:56, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

• European World Cup champions' curse, my new article gets a lot of edits, I hope this gets reviewed. SpyridisioAnnis Discussion 15:43, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

2023

• Labour relations in women's association football — edited considerably since it was approved from a draft as Stub-class and subsequently improved out of an AfD. -Socccc (talk) 01:14, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Log

The full log of assessment changes for the past thirty days is available here.