Wikipedia:WikiProject China/Assessment

    Add links
    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    中華 / 中华
    Welcome to WikiProject China
    Main Navigation

    (changes)

    Tools
    Workgroups
    Chinese article statistics

    This list is automatically updated every night around 3 AM (UTC)
    Shortcuts

    Article assessments are specified using the {{WikiProject China}} project banner, and can be seen in the sub-categories of Category:China-related articles by quality and Category:China-related articles by importance. Summaries are in Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/China-related articles by quality statistics.

    To add an article to WikiProject China, add {{WikiProject China}} to the talk page. Any member of WikiProject China is free to add or update the rating of an article. If you are in doubt or disagree about a rating please bring it up for discussion on our talk page.

    Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/China-related articles by quality log is a full log of rating changes over the past thirty days. For an overview see the statistics.

    Instructions[edit]

    Quality assessment[edit]

    An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject China}} project banner on its talk page:

    {{WikiProject China|class=???}}

    The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):

    FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class China-related articles)  FA
    A (adds articles to Category:A-Class China-related articles)  A
    GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class China-related articles)  GA
    B (adds articles to Category:B-Class China-related articles) B
    C (adds articles to Category:C-Class China-related articles) C
    Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class China-related articles) Start
    Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class China-related articles) Stub
    FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class China-related articles)  FL
    List (adds articles to Category:List-Class China-related articles) List

    For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:

    Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class China-related articles) Category
    Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class China-related articles) Disambig
    Draft (for drafts; adds pages to Category:Draft-Class China-related articles) Draft
    File (for files and timed text; adds pages to Category:File-Class China-related articles) File
    Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class China-related articles) Portal
    Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class China-related articles) Project
    Redirect (for redirect pages; adds pages to Category:Redirect-Class China-related articles) Redirect
    Template (for templates and modules; adds pages to Category:Template-Class China-related articles) Template
    NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class China-related articles) NA
    ??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed China-related articles) ???

    Quality scale[edit]

    WikiProject article quality grading scheme
    Class Criteria Reader's experience Editing suggestions Example
     FA The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates.
    More detailed criteria
    The article meets the featured article criteria:

    A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.

    1. It is:
      1. well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard;
      2. comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context;
      3. well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate;
      4. neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias;
      5. stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and
      6. compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing.
    2. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of:
      1. a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
      2. appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and
      3. consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required.
    3. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly.
    4. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style.
    		 Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. Battle of Red Cliffs
     FL The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates.
    More detailed criteria
    The article meets the featured list criteria:
    1. Prose. It features professional standards of writing.
    2. Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria.
    3. Comprehensiveness.
    4. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities.
    5. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages.
    6. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.
    		 Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available. List of Chinese inventions
     A The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
    More detailed criteria
    The article meets the A-Class criteria:
    Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history).
    		 Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. First Battle of Maryang San
     GA The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations.
    More detailed criteria
    A good article is:
    1. Well-written:
      1. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
      2. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
    2. Verifiable with no original research:
      1. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
      2. all inline citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counterintuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines;
      3. it contains no original research; and
      4. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
    3. Broad in its coverage:
      1. it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
      2. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
    4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
    5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
    6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
      1. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
      2. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
    		 Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (but not equaling) the quality of a professional encyclopedia. Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. Shanghai
    B The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards.
    More detailed criteria
    1. The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional.
    2. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
    3. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
    4. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.
    5. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
    6. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.
    		 Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. Gan Ning
    C The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup.
    More detailed criteria
    The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
    		 Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. People's Liberation Army
    Start An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources.
    More detailed criteria
    The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
    • A useful picture or graphic
    • Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
    • A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
    • Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
    		 Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. Luo Guanzhong
    Stub A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. Liu Ding, Prince of Shanyang
    List Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. Historical capitals of China
    Category Any category falls under this class. Categories are mainly used to group together articles within a particular subject area. Large categories may need to be split into one or more subcategories. Be wary of articles that have been miscategorized. Category:China
    Disambig Any disambiguation page falls under this class. The page serves to distinguish multiple articles that share the same (or similar) title. Additions should be made as new articles of that name are created. Pay close attention to the proper naming of such pages, as they often do not need "(disambiguation)" appended to the title. China (disambiguation)
    File Any page in the file namespace falls under this class. The page contains an image, a sound clip or other media-related content. Make sure that the file is properly licensed and credited. File:Greatwall large.jpg
    Portal Any page in the portal namespace falls under this class. Portals are intended to serve as "main pages" for specific topics. Editor involvement is essential to ensure that portals are kept up to date. Portal:China
    Redirect Any redirect falls under this class. The page redirects to another article with a similar name, related topic or that has been merged with the original article at this location. Editor involvement is essential to ensure that articles are not mis-classified as redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. Chinese Zodiac
    Template Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates include infoboxes and navboxes. Different types of templates serve different purposes. Infoboxes provide easy access to key pieces of information about the subject. Navboxes are for the purpose of grouping together related subjects into an easily accessible format, to assist the user in navigating between articles. Infoboxes are typically placed at the upper right of an article, while navboxes normally go across the very bottom of a page. Beware of too many different templates, as well as templates that give either too little, too much, or too specialized information. Template:China topics
    NA Any non-article page that fits no other classification. The page contains no article content. Look out for misclassified articles. Currently, many NA-class articles may need to be re-classified. Wikipedia:WikiProject China/Requested articles

    Importance assessment[edit]

    An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject China}} project banner on its talk page:

    {{WikiProject China|importance=???}}

    The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):

    Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance China-related articles)  Top 
    High (adds articles to Category:High-importance China-related articles)  High 
    Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance China-related articles)  Mid 
    Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance China-related articles)  Low 
    NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance China-related articles)  NA 
    ??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance China-related articles)  ??? 

    Importance scale[edit]

    WikiProject article importance scheme
    Importance Criteria Example
     Top Subject is a must-have for a print encyclopedia. High probability that non-Chinese would look this up. When giving this rating to an article, try to check with other members of WikiProject China on our talk page. China
     High Subject contributes a depth of knowledge to the encyclopedia. Guzheng
     Mid Subject fills in more minor details, and may have been included primarily to achieve comprehensive coverage of another topic. Chinese Rites controversy
     Low Subject is peripheral knowledge, possibly trivial. 2008 Summer Paralympics
     NA Subject importance is not applicable. Generally applies to non-article pages such as redirects, categories, templates, etc. Category:China
     ??? Subject importance has not yet been assessed. ???

    Participants[edit]

    Please feel free to add your name to this list if you would like to join the assessment team

    1. Alexjookim (talk · contribs)
    2. AQu01rius (talk · contribs)
    3. Blootix (talk · contribs)
    4. Bobbychan193 (talk · contribs)
    5. Chen19711 (talk · contribs)
    6. Chongkian (talk · contribs)
    7. CWH (talk · contribs)
    8. Danaman5 (talk · contribs)
    9. Durzatwink (talk · contribs)
    10. E8xE8 (talk · contribs)
    11. Ethansmith (talk · contribs)
    12. F1anders (talk · contribs) history & culture
    13. GWST11 (talk · contribs)
    14. Hiàn (talk · contribs)
    15. Homunculus (talk · contribs) - Chinese history, politics, law, religion
    16. Ideogram (talk · contribs)
    17. Jaguar (talk · contribs)
    18. Joey Aldo (talk · contribs)
    19. Ksyrie (talk · contribs)
    20. Kyle.Mullaney (talk · contribs)
    21. LittleCuteSuit (talk · contribs)
    22. LLTimes (talk · contribs)
    23. Mopswade (talk · contribs)
    24. Redcloud822 (talk · contribs)
    25. Rincewind42 (talk · contribs)
    26. Sarcelles (talk · contribs)
    27. Sɛvɪnti faɪv (talk · contribs)
    28. Shadowy Sorcerer (talk · contribs) Chinese History and Philosophy, especially the more contentious modern political issues.
    29. Shellwood (talk · contribs)
    30. Shenhemu (talk · contribs)
    31. simplyla (talk · contribs) Yunnan, ethnic minorities, linguistics (dialects & minority language), travel
    32. StrikoWriter1234 (talk · contribs)
    33. Studious Human (talk · contribs) Chinese History
    34. STSC (talk · contribs)
    35. Takamaxa (talk · contribs) - help out classification of existing articles.
    36. Tavatar (talk · contribs)
    37. TheAsianGURU (talk · contribs) Mainly WP:China, WP:Hong Kong & other WP Projects.
    38. Vancancy (talk · contribs)
    39. Warren Leywon (talk · contribs)
    40. Whsun808 (talk · contribs)
    41. Windmemories (talk · contribs)
    42. Zhaofeng Li (talk · contribs)

    Example assessments[edit]

    To assess an article, paste one of the following onto the article's talk page.

    Quality

    • {{WPCHINA|class=FA}} - to rate an article at FA-Class
    • {{WPCHINA|class=A}} - to rate an article at A-Class
    • {{WPCHINA|class=GA}} - to rate an article at GA-Class
    • {{WPCHINA|class=B}} - to rate an article at B-Class
    • {{WPCHINA|class=Start}} - to rate an article at Start-Class
    • {{WPCHINA|class=Stub}} - to rate an article at Stub-Class
    • {{WPCHINA}} - to leave the article un-assessed.

    Importance

    • {{WPCHINA|importance=Top}} - to rate an article at Top importance
    • {{WPCHINA|importance=High}} - to rate an article at High importance
    • {{WPCHINA|importance=Mid}} - to rate an article at Mid importance
    • {{WPCHINA|importance=Low}} - to rate an article at Low importance

    Statistics[edit]

    China-related articles by quality and importance
    Quality Importance
    Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
    FA 7 13 12 19 51
    FL 2 3 7 12
    A 1 3 4
    GA 12 41 93 120 266
    B 114 237 547 639 33 1,570
    C 146 397 1,105 2,271 753 4,672
    Start 91 754 4,139 10,752 23 3,339 19,098
    Stub 273 4,360 19,436 256 11,093 35,418
    List 22 67 222 1,264 7 166 1,748
    Category 17,746 17,746
    Disambig 5 2 1,288 46 1,341
    File 966 966
    Portal 184 184
    Project 53 53
    Redirect 14 65 102 1,613 1,794
    Template 3 11 23 2,774 2,811
    NA 1 1
    Other 2 166 168
    Assessed 392 1,801 10,563 34,640 25,077 15,430 87,903
    Unassessed 20 3,647 3,667
    Total 392 1,801 10,563 34,660 25,077 19,077 91,570
    WikiWork factors (?) ω = 331,997 Ω = 5.43


    By workgroup[edit]

    Chinese history articles by quality and importance
    Quality Importance
    Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
    FA 5 10 4 1 20
    FL 1 1 2
    A 1 1
    GA 2 23 18 4 47
    B 16 29 60 71 1 177
    C 24 59 123 102 13 321
    Start 7 124 412 257 4 45 849
    Stub 58 165 174 10 155 562
    List 2 7 6 131 2 148
    Category 226 226
    Disambig 18 18
    File 7 7
    Project 5 5
    Redirect 3 5 2 42 52
    Template 1 1 23 25
    Assessed 56 314 796 743 335 216 2,460
    Unassessed 1 2 3
    Total 56 314 796 744 335 218 2,463
    WikiWork factors (?) ω = 9,532 Ω = 4.82
    Chinese politics articles by quality and importance
    Quality Importance
    Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
    GA 2 2
    B 2 7 3 12
    C 4 7 8 36 4 59
    Start 6 32 96 6 140
    Stub 1 5 41 5 52
    List 1 1
    Category 35 35
    Disambig 1 1
    Project 1 1
    Redirect 2 2
    Template 5 5
    Assessed 4 16 52 179 44 15 310
    Total 4 16 52 179 44 15 310
    WikiWork factors (?) ω = 1,288 Ω = 4.86
    Chinese cities articles by quality and importance
    Quality Importance
    Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
    GA 2 2
    B 5 2 1 8
    C 21 1 6 3 31
    Start 5 4 51 23 7 90
    Stub 2 51 49 48 150
    List 6 6
    Category 40 40
    Project 2 2
    Template 1 1
    Assessed 33 9 109 81 43 55 330
    Unassessed 1 1
    Total 33 9 109 81 43 56 331
    WikiWork factors (?) ω = 1,502 Ω = 5.35
    Chinese provinces articles by quality and importance
    Quality Importance
    Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
    GA 1 1
    B 5 4 1 10
    C 7 1 1 1 10
    Start 13 2 2 3 20
    Stub 1 10 11
    List 1 1 2
    Category 55 55
    Project 1 1
    Template 1 1
    Assessed 26 3 4 19 57 2 111
    Total 26 3 4 19 57 2 111
    WikiWork factors (?) ω = 238 Ω = 4.58
    Chinese cinema articles by quality and importance
    Quality Importance
    Top High Mid Low NA Other ??? Total
    FA 3 3
    FL 1 1
    GA 14 14
    B 1 1 1 10 13
    C 3 20 88 4 115
    Start 1 22 365 1,315 53 1,756
    Stub 5 723 1,100 90 1,918
    List 29 29 294 5 357
    Category 80 79 159
    Disambig 1 1
    File 13 13
    Project 1 1
    Redirect 5 3 17 25
    Template 15 25 40
    Assessed 2 1 59 1,143 99 2,960 152 4,416
    Total 2 1 59 1,143 99 2,960 152 4,416
    WikiWork factors (?) ω = 20,845 Ω = 5.45

    Non-article pages[edit]

    China-related
    non-article pages    		 Type
    Class
    Disambiguation Redirect Template Category Image Portal Other Total
    Total 1,341 1,797 2,813 17,746 966 184 24 23,881

    Assessment log[edit]

    June 4, 2023[edit]

    Renamed[edit]

    Reassessed[edit]

    • Zhao Yingyun (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
    • Zhao Ziye (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
    • Zheng Xincong (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
    • Zhou Shengtao (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)

    Assessed[edit]

    June 3, 2023[edit]

    Renamed[edit]

    Reassessed[edit]

    • Cross-strait language database (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
    • The Religion of Falun Gong (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
    • Zhang Hongsen (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
    • Zhang Huajun (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
    • Zhang Weiqing (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
    • Zhang Yushu (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
    • Zhang Zuoha (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
    • Zhao Fulin (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)

    Assessed[edit]

    Removed[edit]

    June 2, 2023[edit]

    Renamed[edit]

    Reassessed[edit]

    • Development zones of Shenyang (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t)
    • Ecovillages in China (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
    • Ethnic Chinese (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Redirect-Class to Disambig-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from NA-Class to Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
    • Huang Qing Zhigong Tu (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
    • Zhang Lu (taikonaut) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)

    Assessed[edit]

    June 1, 2023[edit]

    Renamed[edit]

    Reassessed[edit]

    • Ethnic Chinese (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Disambig-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t)
    • Fu Hao owl zun (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
    • Yonglian (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
    • Yu Junwei (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
    • Yu Yunyao (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
    • Yujiulü Furen (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
    • Zaili teaching (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
    • Zhengao (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to B-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
    • Zhu Fulin (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)

    Assessed[edit]

    May 31, 2023[edit]

    Renamed[edit]

    Reassessed[edit]

    Assessed[edit]

    Removed[edit]

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_China/Assessment&oldid=1120451931"