This is an essay on notability.
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
Vanispamcruftisement (/ˌvænɪˌspæmkrəfˈtaɪzmənt/; sometimes abbreviated as vanispamcruft or VSCA) is a portmanteau neologism comprising several editorial faults which some Wikipedians see as cardinal sins: vanity (i.e., conflict of interest), spam, cruft, and advertisement. The term was coined by User:Freakofnurture to describe an article nominated for deletion which exhibited all the above properties, being an article apparently created by the owner of a small company about that company, name-checking the owner of the firm with a brief résumé of his skills, and in respect of a company whose products appeared on the face of it to be of strictly limited appeal outside the world of geekdom.
These faults all exhibit poor neutrality and any one of them inherently violates Wikipedia's policy on bias.
- Criteria for Speedy Deletion
- Conflicts of interest
- Inclusion guidelines
- Guidelines on external linking
- ^ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SPURware diff from 13:20, December 29, 2005
Other bad ideas
- Wikipedia:Complete bollocks
- Wikipedia:I wouldn't know him from a hole in the ground
- Wikipedia:List of really, really, really stupid article ideas that you really, really, really should not create
- Wikipedia:Spam event horizon
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not the place to post your résumé
- User:Durova/The dark side