Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 March 21

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< March 20 March 22 >

March 21[edit]

Template:Docheck03[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:34, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, last edited in 2006 and has errors. Don't think it's worth keeping. Satricious (talk) 16:50, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Israel Rail color[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:12, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Israel Railways. Gonnym (talk) 08:36, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kryvyi Rih Metrotram style[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:03, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Kryvyi Rih Metrotram. Gonnym (talk) 08:44, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kyiv Light Rail color[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:03, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Kyiv Light Rail. Gonnym (talk) 08:51, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FCC lines[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:04, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused rail templates. Either unneeded or superseded by some other module. Gonnym (talk) 08:54, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:S-line/BE-IC left/E[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:04, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused old S-line templates presumably because they are either not needed anymore or have been replaced with something else. If any should be kept, let me know. Gonnym (talk) 09:01, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Adjacent stations/NSW TrainLink regional[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:09, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Now unused after the style was merged into Module:Adjacent stations/NSW TrainLink. Gonnym (talk) 12:28, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:History of cuisine[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:35, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Everything in this navbox template should be included in the "Historical" section of {{Cuisines}}, leaving this template unnecessarily redundant since it will by default be present on any page that can have {{Cuisines}} on it. (Since {{Cuisines}} is not wholly about "history of cuisines", I believe this template should be deleted rather than redirected.) Steel1943 (talk) 17:12, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lang-grc-x-byzant[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Lang-grc-x-medieval. Izno (talk) 02:57, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Lang-grc-x-byzant with Template:Lang-grc-x-medieval.
Medieval Greek and Byzantine Greek are generally considered to be synonymous. This Byzantine Greek template should be merged into the Medieval Greek template.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  18:56, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Both templates created as part of this discussion. Nominator should notify that and possibly other wiki projects.
Both templates are nominally used about the same so someone, not me 'cause I haven't a clue, but someone, thinks that a reasonable distinction exists between them. It is this that, I think, makes it important for nominator to notify the cognizant wiki project(s).
—Trappist the monk (talk) 19:15, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. Both Medieval Greek and Byzantine Greek link to Medieval Greek. Both the lead of that article and its infobox mention both names (and also Middle Greek). As long as our articles identify these as the same, our templates should follow that as well and should not create a hidden parallel system. Gonnym (talk) 09:37, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Currency value[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:35, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template does not work since 2008. It just displays a fixed link to a webpage regardless of the parameters. It is not used and it's not going to be used in its current state Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 21:21, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment from the documentation, it seems to have never been finished, since it's been under construction since 2008, when a triplet of edits created the template -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 03:24, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, not useful. Frietjes (talk) 15:26, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:51, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete long unfinished template with no future whatsoever. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  19:16, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_March_21&oldid=1080581922"