Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nitinule/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Nitinule

Nitinule (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

23 February 2019[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Procedural filing per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jorjman. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:16, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • Already blocked and tagged. Nothing left to do here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:17, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

01 November 2019[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]


Same editing patterns as two of the blocked socks, user:San Pietersen and user:Suhas Rane. Seems to be promoting "livingfoodz.com", a paid editor? Many small additions to Indian food articles; there's always a sentence or two sourced to some book on books.google.co.in, followed by another sentence or two, usually listing ingredients, always sourced to livingfoodz.com. I don't actually see behavioral similarity to the master, Nitinule, nor to the other sock, user:Gurukulpratishthan, but it looks like they were checkuser confirmed here: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jorjman/Archive#27 December 2018. Aadarsh Gandhi had been editing earlier about investing and other topics, with numerous warnings for promotional editing. Then around July 2018, the livingfoodz.com edits started, the San Pietersen and Suhas Rane accounts were created and started making the same edits, and Mann1210, who seems to have been a sleeper since the one edit in 2014, also joined in. IamNotU (talk) 02:41, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • Already got them  Confirmed to each other, looking for additional accounts. ST47 (talk) 03:32, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • They're on a group of very busy ranges (big surprise), so I can't definitively connect them to any other accounts - though I did come across a few other obvious spam-only accounts and blocked them. These two are  Confirmed to each other and to previous socks via the CU log.  Blocked and tagged Closing. ST47 (talk) 03:40, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

30 November 2019[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]


Obvious socks, all edits the same patterns as last time, livingfoodz.com cite spam. IamNotU (talk) 23:42, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

This case is being reviewed by JJMC89 as part of the clerk training process. Please allow him to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on his talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

livingfoodz.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:frMER-C X-wikigs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: searchmeta • Domain: domaintoolsAboutUs.com

  •  Blocked and tagged. CheckUser requested and endorsed by clerk to check for other accounts. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:26, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  In progress - ST47 (talk) 03:03, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Those are the only two on this range. ST47 (talk) 03:05, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Added to blacklist.
     — Berean Hunter (talk) 23:44, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]