Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Politics, government, and law
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Venezuela/Reliable and unreliable sources
|Which of the following options is suitable regarding Wikipedia:WikiProject Venezuela/Reliable and unreliable sources?
|Should the three past elections contested by this current U.S. presidential candidate be presented in the form of Election Results tables using Template:Election box (e.g. ), or, should they be removed and replaced with this sentence: "Castro contested several elections, but didn't succeed." Chetsford (talk) 14:40, 7 June 2023 (UTC)|
|Does the reference in the infobox for social liberalism comply with Wikipedia guidelines and specifically WP:SYNTH? Helper201 (talk) 16:42, 6 June 2023 (UTC)|
|What is the reliability of La Patilla?
|In reference to the January 6 United States Capitol attack, the Donald Trump article currently says, |
According to the Department of Justice, more than 140 police officers were injured, and five people, including a Capitol Police officer, died.
|Should we say the battle is over, and that Russia has won? Slatersteven (talk) 17:06, 4 June 2023 (UTC)|
Talk:Durham special counsel investigation
|Should the current lead sentence...
be amended to include this bold content...
This question is rooted in what Charlie Savage exclusively reported in The New York Times:
This matter has been previously discussed in this Talk thread. soibangla (talk) 15:47, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
|Regarding the issue surrounding the reports, which previously did not achieve a consensus, three options are proposed:
Thank you, Simón, el Silbón (talk) 19:11, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
|At the time of this RfC, the article includes a sentence covering how PragerU profited off a video of theirs that contained anti-LGBT content.
There exists three sources for this content that have been discussed thus far, Media Matters, Washington Blade, Columbia Journalism Review.
After intense debate above, it was work-shopped into three proposals:Option A:
Option C: Leave it out entirely.
17:28, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums
|How should party colours (as stored in (e.g.) Module:Political party/A and used in infoboxes, results tables etc) be determined? By the dominant colour of the logo or via colours used for the party in the media. Number 57 10:27, 30 May 2023 (UTC)|
|Should the maps of Suriname include the disputed areas?--Jerome Frank Disciple 12:30, 27 May 2023 (UTC)|
|Should the first sentence of the article say that Assange is a "prisoner fighting extradition to the US" or something like this? Jack Upland (talk) 05:04, 25 May 2023 (UTC)|
|Which of the two article versions do you conider more NPOV from a global (non-US-centric) perspective? Special:Diff/1155967719 or Special:Diff/1132451253?
[Edit: these are additional questions not compulsory to the RFC]
Could the two be combined into something that is more NPOV than either?
Where do you see the NPOV issues in the two versions? ShabbyHoose (talk) 16:51, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
|Should this article include text about the "heckling of President Obama" Andre🚐 15:56, 18 May 2023 (UTC)|
Talk:List of guests at the coronation of Charles III and Camilla
|How should MOS:JOBTITLE be applied to this page? Should peers be listed under their name and title or title alone? A.D.Hope (talk) 13:01, 18 May 2023 (UTC)|
|Should a link to Crime in Serbia be included as a ″see also″ entry under the section ″Law and criminal justice″? --TylerBurden (talk) 19:03, 14 May 2023 (UTC)|