Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Madcowpoo

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Madcowpoo[edit]

Final (0/14/0) Ended Mon, 2 Oct 2006 21:35:28 UTC

Madcowpoo (talk · contribs) – I've been a member for ummm... well quite a bit long. And i'm a member of the doctor who, final fantasy and computing projects. i've helped a few neebies out in the help sction. i resently fixed up the basic4gl page. And renovated a few other pages. i haven't done much publishing resently becuase of course work. and i made a template for a user. also i try to keep a netral point of view. well i think i'm out of ideas :(.thats all i have to say. Madcow 19:30, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: yes --Madcow 20:48, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog and Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.

A: stop vanderlism, make sure wikipedia is the best it can be and there are no probs

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A: basic4gl becuase it was the best edit ever.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: acedently edited a page not in the sandbox by mistake

General comments

See madcowpoo's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool.

Discussion (for expressing views without numbering)

NOTE: Edit summary usage for madcowpoo: 3% for major edits and 0% for minor edits. --Skenmy^{(talk)|(news)} 20:25, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support

Oppose

Oppose. Fewer than 1000 edits, mucked up this RfA, rushed answers. Try reading WP:GRFA. --Alex (Talk) 19:42, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Very few namespace edits, very few edits at all. The many errors trying to set up this request show a lack of knowledge of wikipedia. Answers are unsatisfactory. Gain some more experience, get to know wikipedia better and try again in some time. Aecis ^{I'm too busy acting like I'm not naive} 19:43, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: At the current time, the user is far from ready. — G a ry Kirk // ^talk! 19:47, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Less than 500 edits, RfA problems, short answers. Michael 19:48, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose and urge withdrawal Less than 500 edits. Has absolutely no grasp of correct English grammar or spelling. "stop vanderlism"? "acedently"? --CFIF ☎ ⋐ 19:59, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose; can't support a user whom starts as a vandal[1][2]. Please try again in 2 years time when you have gained my trust and enough experience.--Andeh 20:22, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Oppose: and request for removal per WP:SNOW. Obviously has no intention of using the tools in an effective manner. --Skenmy^{(talk)|(news)} 20:23, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose and a plea for administrative closure because it was the worst borderline hoax RFA ever. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 20:31, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. This made me lol though. --SonicChao userpage uncyclopedia 20:36, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Good start so far, but you're way too inexperienced. Try again maybe after 3,000 edits. Also, use a spellchecker. It's vandalism, not vanderlism. --Nishkid64 20:55, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Too inexperienced, too many of their small number of mainspace edits have been reverted, spelling/grammar must improve, and horrible answers. —LOL 21:11, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Is this a joke? (WP:SNOW comes to mind here) -- RM 21:18, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Horrific spelling and I recommend changing the scatalogical username. I recommend withdrawing this RFA right now. Moreschi 21:19, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not enough experience and the rest above and I also believe WP:SNOW comes into play here. Hello32020 21:26, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.