Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Juliancolton

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Juliancolton

FINAL (0/2/0); closed [roughly] 17:27, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Juliancolton (talk · contribs) - I nominated myself for adminship becasue I wish I had the admin tools to revert vandalism Juliancolton (talk) 17:27, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?

reverting vandalism:

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

my best contributions are towards hurricane articles, especially (trying) to improve them:

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

I have been in edit conflicts:

General comments

• See Juliancolton's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.

• Links for Juliancolton: Juliancolton (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)

---

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Juliancolton before commenting.

Discussion

Oppose

1. Oppose - User is not experienced enough. Come back at a later time, man. I'd also like to ask for WP:SNOW closing.^Mitch32^contribs 20:19, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
2. Strong oppose. Although the user did not sign the nomination statement, I will assume this is open for comment since it is on the main space. The user does not need RFA tools to revert vandalism; anyone can revert vandalism! --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:21, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Neutral

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.